Decentralized Spectrum Sharing Networks Based on Blockchains

被引:0
作者
Ai, Shuyue [1 ]
Jiang, Yuna [1 ]
Li, Qiang [1 ]
Ge, Xiaohu [1 ]
Sali, Aduwati [2 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Elect Informat & Commun, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[2] UPM, Fac Engn, Dept Comp & Commun Syst Engn, Seri Kembangan, Malaysia
来源
20TH INTERNATIONAL WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS & MOBILE COMPUTING CONFERENCE, IWCMC 2024 | 2024年
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Blockchain; spectrum sharing; scale law; decentralization;
D O I
10.1109/IWCMC61514.2024.10592540
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
The dynamic spectrum sharing technology in cognitive radio can effectively improve the utilization rate of spectrum and relieve the current spectrum pressure. To realize spectrum sharing without trust between SUs and PUs belonging to various operators, a decentralized spectrum sharing scheme based on blockchain is proposed in this paper. A latency model and a decentralization degree model of blockchain-enabled spectrum sharing network are formulated. Network scale law in this paper is defined as the change law of structure and scale in a network. Based on the proposed decentralization degree and latency model, the scale law of blockchain networks under the constraints of latency and decentralization is studied. The simulation analyzes the change of the proportion of consensus nodes in the blockchain network with different requirements for latency and decentralization. The results show that when blockchain networks have both low latency and decentralization characteristics, the upper limit of the total number of nodes is 390, and the value range of the proportion of consensus nodes is between 0.13 and 0.56.
引用
收藏
页码:786 / 791
页数:6
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] Arsat N., 2022, 2022 10 INT C CYB IT, P1
  • [2] Keke Wu, 2019, 2019 IEEE 9th International Conference on Electronics Information and Emergency Communication (ICEIEC). Proceedings, P287, DOI 10.1109/ICEIEC.2019.8784631
  • [3] Ethereum Smart Contract Analysis Tools: A Systematic Review
    Kushwaha, Satpal Singh
    Joshi, Sandeep
    Singh, Dilbag
    Kaur, Manjit
    Lee, Heung-No
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2022, 10 : 57037 - 57062
  • [4] Impossibility of Full Decentralization in Permissionless Blockchains
    Kwon, Yujin
    Liu, Jian
    Kim, Minjeong
    Song, Dawn
    Kim, Yongdae
    [J]. AFT'19: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1ST ACM CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES IN FINANCIAL TECHNOLOGIES, 2019, : 110 - 123
  • [5] Cognitive radio: Making software radios more personal
    Mitola, J
    Maguire, GQ
    [J]. IEEE PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS, 1999, 6 (04): : 13 - 18
  • [6] Nakamoto S., 2008, BITCOIN PEER TO PEER
  • [7] Seshadri O, 2021, 2021 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BLOCKCHAIN (BLOCKCHAIN 2021), P140, DOI [10.1109/BLOCKCHAIN53845.2021.00028, 10.1109/Blockchain53845.2021.00028]
  • [8] A Theoretical Model for Block Propagation Analysis in Bitcoin Network
    Shahsavari, Yahya
    Zhang, Kaiwen
    Talhi, Chamseddine
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2022, 69 (04) : 1459 - 1476
  • [9] Srinivasan B., 2017, Quantifying decentralization
  • [10] Data Propagation for Low Latency Blockchain Systems
    Wang, Xin
    Jiang, Xin
    Liu, Yanxiu
    Wang, Jiaping
    Sun, Yi
    [J]. IEEE JOURNAL ON SELECTED AREAS IN COMMUNICATIONS, 2022, 40 (12) : 3631 - 3644