Within-subject variation of C-reactive protein and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Gough, Alex [1 ]
Sitch, Alice [1 ]
Ferris, Erica [1 ]
Marshall, Tom [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Inst Appl Hlth Res, Coll Med & Dent Sci, Birmingham, England
来源
PLOS ONE | 2024年 / 19卷 / 11期
关键词
BIOLOGICAL VARIATION;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0304961
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background C-reactive protein (CRP) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) are measures of inflammation used in diagnosis, to guide treatment decisions, and in disease prediction. Variability in measured CRP and hsCRP may affect their clinical utility but estimates of within-subject variability are based on limited data.Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to estimate longitudinal within-subject variability of CRP and hsCRP over any time period. Follow-up studies of any design in adults or children, with repeated measures of CRP or hsCRP were sought. Multiple databases were searched from inception to November 2022. Titles and abstracts were screened in duplicate. Full text screening and data extraction were performed by one reviewer and verified by a second. Risk of bias was assessed with a modified Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) tool. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) results were pooled with a meta-analysis and coefficient of variation (CV) results were described by median and range.Results Of 2675 studies identified, 60 met the inclusion criteria: 34 reported CRP and 26 reported hsCRP. For CRP, median CV was 0.41 (range 0.11 to 0.89), and the pooled estimate of ICC was 0.55 (95% CI 0.35 to 0.74). For hsCRP, median CV was 0.44 (range 0.27 to 0.76) and the pooled estimate of ICC was 0.62 (95% CI 0.58 to 0.67).Limitations Assessment of variability was not the main aim of many of the included papers, and it is possible that some relevant papers have been missed. Many of the papers included had low numbers of participants and/or low numbers of repeated measurements.Conclusions Estimated within-subject variability is high for both CRP and hsCRP, but estimates are based on small numbers of participants and measurements. There is a need for better estimates of within-subject variability from analysis of larger numbers of repeated measurements in larger numbers of subjects.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Prognostic Value of High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein in Heart Failure: A Systematic Review
    Araujo, Jose Paulo
    Lourenco, Patricia
    Azevedo, Ana
    Frioes, Fernando
    Rocha-Goncalves, Francisco
    Ferreira, Antonio
    Bettencourt, Paulo
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE, 2009, 15 (03) : 256 - 266
  • [32] The association between high-sensitivity C-reactive protein concentration and diabetic nephropathy: a meta-analysis
    Liu, Q.
    Jiang, C. -Y.
    Chen, B. -X.
    Zhao, W.
    Meng, D.
    EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2015, 19 (23) : 4558 - 4568
  • [33] Evaluation of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein in comparison with C-reactive protein as biochemical serum markers in women with endometriosis
    Lermann, Johannes
    Mueller, Andreas
    Koerber, Frauke
    Oppelt, Peter
    Beckmann, Matthias W.
    Dittrich, Ralf
    Renner, Stefan P.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2010, 93 (07) : 2125 - 2129
  • [34] C-Reactive Protein and C-Reactive Protein-Based Scores to Predict Survival in Esophageal and Junctional Adenocarcinoma: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Cliona M. Lorton
    Larissa Higgins
    Niamh O’Donoghue
    Claire Donohoe
    Jim O’Connell
    David Mockler
    John V. Reynolds
    Declan Walsh
    Joanne Lysaght
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2022, 29 : 1853 - 1865
  • [35] C-reactive protein and risk of breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Guo, Lanwei
    Liu, Shuzheng
    Zhang, Shaokai
    Chen, Qiong
    Zhang, Meng
    Quan, Peiliang
    Lu, Jianbang
    Sun, Xibin
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2015, 5
  • [36] C-reactive protein and risk of breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lanwei Guo
    Shuzheng Liu
    Shaokai Zhang
    Qiong Chen
    Meng Zhang
    Peiliang Quan
    Jianbang Lu
    Xibin Sun
    Scientific Reports, 5
  • [37] Coffee Consumption and C-Reactive Protein Levels: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Moua, Elizabeth D.
    Hu, Chenxiao
    Day, Nicole
    Hord, Norman G.
    Takata, Yumie
    NUTRIENTS, 2020, 12 (05)
  • [38] Systematic review and meta-analysis of C-reactive protein as a biomarker in breast cancer
    Mikkelsen, Marta Kramer
    Lindblom, Nana Aviaja Frederikke
    Dyhl-Polk, Anne
    Juhl, Carsten Bogh
    Johansen, Julia Sidenius
    Nielsen, Dorte
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN CLINICAL LABORATORY SCIENCES, 2022, 59 (07) : 480 - 500
  • [39] C-reactive protein and risk of ovarian cancer A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Jing
    Jiao, Xuedan
    Yuan, Zhongfu
    Qiu, Haifeng
    Guo, Ruixia
    MEDICINE, 2017, 96 (34)
  • [40] Obesity and C-reactive protein in various populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Choi, J.
    Joseph, L.
    Pilote, L.
    OBESITY REVIEWS, 2013, 14 (03) : 232 - 244