Straw Return with Biodegradable Film Mulch: A Synergistic Cultivation Measure with Environmental and Economic Benefits Based on Life Cycle Assessment

被引:0
|
作者
Chen, Qian [1 ]
Zhang, Xiaoni [2 ]
Zhao, Yongqiang [3 ]
Zhang, Qian [4 ]
Sun, Hongwu [4 ]
Hu, Naijuan [4 ]
Zhu, Liqun [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Agr Univ, Coll Agr, Nanjing 210095, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Agr Univ, Coll Humanities & Social Dev, Nanjing 210095, Peoples R China
[3] Xuzhou Inst Agr Sci, Jiangsu Xuhuai Area, Xuzhou 221131, Peoples R China
[4] Jiangsu Acad Agr Sci, Inst Agr Econ & Dev, Nanjing 210014, Peoples R China
来源
AGRONOMY-BASEL | 2024年 / 14卷 / 12期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
straw return; fully biodegradable plastic film mulching; life cycle assessment; environmental effect; economic benefit; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; MAIZE ROTATION SYSTEM; AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION; CROP YIELDS; SOIL; IMPACT; SUSTAINABILITY; WASTE; CHINA;
D O I
10.3390/agronomy14122993
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Straw return and plastic film mulching are two critical management measures that not only maintain high and stable crop yields, but also have a significant impact on the ecological environment. However, there is still a lack of research on the comprehensive effects of straw return and different film mulching treatments on the ecological environment. Thus, a 2-year field experiment was conducted and six treatments, which included two main treatments, namely straw return (SR) and non-straw return (NR), and three sub-treatments, namely no film mulching (CK), plastic film mulching (PM) and fully biodegradable film mulching (BM), were applied in a garlic cropping system. Based on the life cycle assessment method, six endpoint damage categories, resource consumption, global warming potential, environmental acidification, eutrophication, human health, and ecotoxicity, were assessed. Furthermore, we also evaluated the costs and economic benefits of the six treatments and optimized the treatment of used mulch and straw off-farm. The results indicated that the environmental impacts of the six endpoint damages in the garlic cropping system were ranked as ecotoxicity, eutrophication, environmental acidification, global warming potential, human health, and resource consumption. The SR-BM treatment had the lowest life cycle environmental impact composite index at 27.68 per unit area, followed by SR-PM at 27.75. All six endpoint damage categories for the PM and BM treatments were lower than the CK treatment per t of yield, with the SR-BM treatment being the most economically efficient, yielding at 3691.03 CNY<middle dot>t-1 and exceeding that of the SR-CK treatment by 7.26%. Fertilizer inputs were the primary contributor to resource consumption, global warming potential, environmental acidification, eutrophication, and ecotoxicity, accounting for about 72.80% of these five environmental impacts. Crop protection significantly affected human health, and garlic mulching helped minimize pesticide use, thereby reducing potential health impacts. Compared to straw incineration and waste mulch power generation, straw power generation and waste mulch recycling granulation offered positive environmental benefits and were more effective offset strategies. In conclusion, straw return with biodegradable mulch is a synergistic cultivation measure that offers both environmental and economic benefits. For straw return with plastic film mulch, environmental impacts can be reduced by waste mulch recycling granulation.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Environmental benefits analysis based on life cycle assessment of rice straw-based synthetic natural gas in China
    Feng, Fei
    Song, Guohui
    Shen, Laihong
    Xiao, Jun
    ENERGY, 2017, 139 : 341 - 349
  • [2] Life cycle assessment of environmental and economic benefits of bio-ethanol in Taiwan
    Su, Mei-hui
    Tso, Chun-to
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GLOBAL WARMING, 2011, 3 (04) : 339 - 354
  • [3] Microalgae cultivation in a biogas plant: Environmental and economic assessment through a life cycle approach
    Romagnoli, Francesco
    Spaccini, Francesco
    Boggia, Antonio
    Paoli, Riccardo
    Feofilovs, Maksims
    Ievina, Baiba
    Rocchi, Lucia
    BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2024, 182
  • [4] ENVIRONMENTAL AND ECONOMIC IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF CONVERTER STEELMAKING BASED ON LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT
    Liu, Huimin
    Li, Qiqiang
    Ding, Ran
    Li, Guanguan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE COMPUTING INFORMATION AND CONTROL, 2021, 17 (02): : 499 - 509
  • [5] Environmental life cycle assessment and energy-economic analysis in different cultivation of microalgae-based optimization method
    Kazemi, Naser
    Parashkoohi, Mohammad Gholami
    Mohammadi, Ahmad
    Zamani, Davood Mohammad
    RESULTS IN ENGINEERING, 2023, 19
  • [6] Development of a BIM -based Environmental and Economic Life Cycle Assessment tool
    Santos, Ruben
    Costa, Antonio Aguiar
    Silvestre, Jose D.
    Pyl, Lincy
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 265
  • [7] Environmental Comparison of Straw Applications Based on a Life Cycle Assessment Model and Emergy Evaluation
    Gao, Juan
    Ti, Chaopu
    Chen, Ning
    BIORESOURCES, 2015, 10 (01): : 548 - 565
  • [8] Using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to measure the environmental benefits of industrial symbiosis in an industrial cluster of SMEs
    Daddi, Tiberio
    Nucci, Benedetta
    Iraldo, Fabio
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 147 : 157 - 164
  • [9] Using systems-based life cycle assessment to investigate the environmental and economic impacts and benefits of the livestock sector in the UK
    Chatterton, Julia
    Graves, Anil
    Audsley, Eric
    Morris, Joe
    Williams, Adrian
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 86 : 1 - 8
  • [10] A comparative environmental life cycle assessment of rice straw-based bioenergy projects in China
    Alengebawy, Ahmed
    Mohamed, Badr A.
    Ran, Yi
    Yang, Yi
    Pezzuolo, Andrea
    Samer, Mohamed
    Ai, Ping
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2022, 212