Ayurveda interventions for non-specific chronic low back pain- protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis

被引:0
作者
Kumari, Ritu [1 ]
Goyal, Mandip [1 ]
Panara, Kalpesh [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Teaching & Res Ayurveda, Jamnagar, India
关键词
Ayurveda; Chronic low back pain; Meta-analysis; Network meta-analysis; Systematic review; GUIDELINES; HEALTH; CARE;
D O I
10.1016/j.eujim.2024.102413
中图分类号
R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号
10 ;
摘要
Introduction: Low back pain (570 million prevalent cases worldwide) is the main contributor to the overall burden of musculoskeletal conditions. The most common form of low back pain is non-specific low back pain (NSCLBP) (almost 90 %). There are no treatments that completely cure chronic low back pain. Ayurveda is one of the traditional systems of Indian medicine commonly practiced in Southeast Asian countries. Even though Ayurveda interventions (oral medication or procedure-based treatment or combined therapy) are practiced widely for this condition, there is ambiguity about the hierarchy of treatment. The present review has been planned to compare all the available Ayurveda treatment modalities for NSCLBP in terms of efficacy, and safety, in all the age groups of patients. Methods: This review will be written in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and the PRISMA extension for network meta-analyses. Electronic searches will be carried out in PubMed, Scopus, TRIP, Website of Indexing of Indian Medical Journals, the Cochrane Register for Controlled Trials, The Clinical Trials Registry- India, AYUSH research portal, and Digital Helpline for Ayurveda Research Articles, and other pre-print repositories since its inception till 31st March 2024. Randomized controlled trials, randomized cross-over studies, cluster-randomized studies, and nonrandomized studies of interventions (prospective cohort studies, non-randomized clinical trials) will be included. The risk of bias will be assessed with ROB-2, ROBINS-I, and other revised risk of bias tools for cross-over studies and cluster randomised studies recommended by the Cochrane collaboration. To evaluate the credibility of the findings, the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation method for network meta-analysis will be implemented. A narrative approach to synthesize and report qualitative and quantitative data will be used, and where feasible, we will conduct network meta-analyses using STATA software. Conclusions: This protocol defines a plan of the study that would facilitate the process of recommending treatment for NSCLBP, by providing a treatment hierarchy of Ayurvedic treatment to the policymakers and stakeholders.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [21] A time for action: Opportunities for preventing the growing burden and disability from musculoskeletal conditions in low- and middle-income countries
    Hoy, Damian
    Geere, Jo-Anne
    Davatchi, Fereydoun
    Meggitt, Belinda
    Barrero, Lope H.
    [J]. BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH IN CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2014, 28 (03): : 377 - 393
  • [22] The PRISMA Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-analyses of Health Care Interventions: Checklist and Explanations
    Hutton, Brian
    Salanti, Georgia
    Caldwell, Deborah M.
    Chaimani, Anna
    Schmid, Christopher H.
    Cameron, Chris
    Ioannidis, John P. A.
    Straus, Sharon
    Thorlund, Kristian
    Jansen, Jeroen P.
    Mulrow, Cynthia
    Catala-Lopez, Ferran
    Gotzsche, Peter C.
    Dickersin, Kay
    Boutron, Isabelle
    Altman, Douglas G.
    Moher, David
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2015, 162 (11) : 777 - 784
  • [23] Jaiswal Yogini S, 2017, J Tradit Complement Med, V7, P50, DOI 10.1016/j.jtcme.2016.02.002
  • [24] Pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment approaches to chronic lumbar back pain
    Ketenci, Aysegul
    Zure, Mert
    [J]. TURKISH JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2021, 67 (01) : 1 - 10
  • [25] Clinical guidelines for the management of low back pain in primary care - An international comparison
    Koes, BW
    van Tulder, MW
    Ostelo, R
    Burton, AK
    Waddell, G
    [J]. SPINE, 2001, 26 (22) : 2504 - 2513
  • [26] Lefebvre C, 2022, Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 63 (Updated February 2022)
  • [27] Li, 2023, COCHRANE HDB SYSTEMA
  • [28] libguides, Endnote: Endnote X9
  • [29] Non-specific low back pain
    Maher, Chris
    Underwood, Martin
    Buchbinder, Rachelle
    [J]. LANCET, 2017, 389 (10070) : 736 - 747
  • [30] Ministry of Ayush Government of India, Ayurvedic Standard Treatment Guidelines