Ayurveda interventions for non-specific chronic low back pain- protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis

被引:0
作者
Kumari, Ritu [1 ]
Goyal, Mandip [1 ]
Panara, Kalpesh [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Teaching & Res Ayurveda, Jamnagar, India
关键词
Ayurveda; Chronic low back pain; Meta-analysis; Network meta-analysis; Systematic review; GUIDELINES; HEALTH; CARE;
D O I
10.1016/j.eujim.2024.102413
中图分类号
R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号
10 ;
摘要
Introduction: Low back pain (570 million prevalent cases worldwide) is the main contributor to the overall burden of musculoskeletal conditions. The most common form of low back pain is non-specific low back pain (NSCLBP) (almost 90 %). There are no treatments that completely cure chronic low back pain. Ayurveda is one of the traditional systems of Indian medicine commonly practiced in Southeast Asian countries. Even though Ayurveda interventions (oral medication or procedure-based treatment or combined therapy) are practiced widely for this condition, there is ambiguity about the hierarchy of treatment. The present review has been planned to compare all the available Ayurveda treatment modalities for NSCLBP in terms of efficacy, and safety, in all the age groups of patients. Methods: This review will be written in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and the PRISMA extension for network meta-analyses. Electronic searches will be carried out in PubMed, Scopus, TRIP, Website of Indexing of Indian Medical Journals, the Cochrane Register for Controlled Trials, The Clinical Trials Registry- India, AYUSH research portal, and Digital Helpline for Ayurveda Research Articles, and other pre-print repositories since its inception till 31st March 2024. Randomized controlled trials, randomized cross-over studies, cluster-randomized studies, and nonrandomized studies of interventions (prospective cohort studies, non-randomized clinical trials) will be included. The risk of bias will be assessed with ROB-2, ROBINS-I, and other revised risk of bias tools for cross-over studies and cluster randomised studies recommended by the Cochrane collaboration. To evaluate the credibility of the findings, the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation method for network meta-analysis will be implemented. A narrative approach to synthesize and report qualitative and quantitative data will be used, and where feasible, we will conduct network meta-analyses using STATA software. Conclusions: This protocol defines a plan of the study that would facilitate the process of recommending treatment for NSCLBP, by providing a treatment hierarchy of Ayurvedic treatment to the policymakers and stakeholders.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] Ali Mumtaz, 2010, Ayu, V31, P456, DOI 10.4103/0974-8520.82042
  • [2] Bakhashi Babita, 2010, Ayu, V31, P240, DOI 10.4103/0974-8520.72408
  • [3] Evaluating medical tests: introducing the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy
    Bossuyt, Patrick M.
    Deeks, Jonathan J.
    Leeflang, Mariska M.
    Takwoingi, Yemisi
    Flemyng, Ella
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2023, (07):
  • [4] Musculoskeletal Health Conditions Represent a Global Threat to Healthy Aging: A Report for the 2015 World Health Organization World Report on Ageing and Health
    Briggs, Andrew M.
    Cross, Marita J.
    Hoy, Damian G.
    Sanchez-Riera, Lidia
    Blyth, Fiona M.
    Woolf, Anthony D.
    March, Lyn
    [J]. GERONTOLOGIST, 2016, 56 : S243 - S255
  • [5] GRADE guidelines 33: Addressing imprecision in a network meta-analysis
    Brignardello-Petersen, Romina
    Guyatt, Gordon H.
    Mustafa, Reem A.
    Chu, Derek K.
    Hultcrantz, Monica
    Schuenemann, Holger J.
    Tomlinson, George
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2021, 139 : 49 - 56
  • [6] GRADE approach to rate the certainty from a network meta-analysis: addressing incoherence
    Brignardello-Petersen, Romina
    Mustafa, Reem A.
    Siemieniuk, Reed A. C.
    Murad, M. Hassan
    Agoritsas, Thomas
    Izcovich, Ariel
    Schunemann, Holger J.
    Guyatt, Gordon H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2019, 108 : 77 - 85
  • [7] Advances in the GRADE approach to rate the certainty in estimates from a network meta-analysis
    Brignardello-Petersen, Romina
    Bonner, Ashley
    Alexander, Paul E.
    Siemieniuk, Reed A.
    Furukawa, Toshi A.
    Rochwerg, Bram
    Hazlewood, Glen S.
    Alhazzani, Waleed
    Mustafa, Reem A.
    Murad, M. Hassan
    Puhan, Milo A.
    Schunemann, Holger J.
    Guyatt, Gordon H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2018, 93 : 36 - 44
  • [8] Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: reporting guideline
    Campbell, Mhairi
    McKenzie, Joanne E.
    Sowden, Amanda
    Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal
    Brennan, Sue E.
    Ellis, Simon
    Hartmann-Boyce, Jamie
    Ryan, Rebecca
    Shepperd, Sasha
    Thomas, James
    Welch, Vivian
    Thomson, Hilary
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 368
  • [9] Dias S., 2014, NICE DSU TECHNICAL S
  • [10] A consensus approach toward the standardization of back pain definitions for use in prevalence studies
    Dionne, Clermont E.
    Dunn, Kate M.
    Croft, Peter R.
    Nachemson, Alf L.
    Buchbinder, Rachelle
    Walker, Bruce F.
    Wyatt, Mary
    Cassidy, J. David
    Rossignol, Michel
    Leboeuf-Yde, Charlotte
    Hartvigsen, Jan
    Leino-Arjas, Paeivi
    Latza, Ute
    Reis, Shmuel
    del Real, Maria Teresa Gil
    Kovacs, Francisco M.
    Oberg, Birgitta
    Cedraschi, Christine
    Bouter, Lex M.
    Koes, Bart W.
    Picavet, H. Susan J.
    van Tulder, Maurits W.
    Burton, Kim
    Foster, Nadine E.
    Macfarlane, Gary J.
    Thomas, Elaine
    Underwood, Martin
    Waddell, Gordon
    Shekelle, Paul
    Volinn, Ernest
    Von Korff, Michael
    [J]. SPINE, 2008, 33 (01) : 95 - 103