Enhancing multisensory rehabilitation of visual field defects with transcranial direct current stimulation: A randomized clinical trial

被引:0
|
作者
Diana, Lorenzo [1 ]
Casati, Carlotta [1 ]
Melzi, Lisa [2 ,3 ]
Marzoli, Stefania Bianchi [2 ,3 ]
Bolognini, Nadia [1 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] IRCCS Ist Auxol Italiano, Dept Neurorehabil Sci, Lab Neuropsychol, Via Mercalli 28, Milan, Italy
[2] IRCCS Ist Auxol Italiano, Neuroophthalmol Ctr, Milan, Italy
[3] IRCCS Ist Auxol Italiano, Ocular Electrophysiol Lab, Milan, Italy
[4] Univ Milano Bicocca, Dept Psychol, Milan, Italy
[5] NeuroMI, Milan, Italy
关键词
hemianopia; rehabilitation; stroke; transcranial direct current stimulation; NONINVASIVE BRAIN-STIMULATION; AUDIOVISUAL INTEGRATION; HEMIANOPIC PATIENTS; SEARCH; IMPROVEMENT; VISION; MODULATION; RESPONSES; INSIGHTS; CORTEX;
D O I
10.1111/ene.16559
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and PurposeVisual rehabilitation is necessary for improving the quality of life of patients with acquired homonymous visual field defects (HVFDs). By modulating brain excitability and plasticity, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) may accelerate and increase the effects of compensatory trainings, which are usually long and intensive. In the present proof-of-principle, double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled study, we assess whether anodal tDCS applied over ipsilesional occipital or parietal cortices can increase the effects of a compensatory audiovisual training for HVFDs.MethodsEighteen participants with chronic HVFDs were randomized to receive anodal or sham tDCS over the ipsilesional parietal or occipital cortex during a 2-week (10 days, 2 h/day) audiovisual treatment aimed at improving oculomotor visual field exploration. Improvements were assessed by administering visual detection with eye movements and visual search tests, and a questionnaire for activities of daily living (ADLs) before the treatment, at its end, and at 1-month and 4-month follow-ups; lesion analyses were performed to look for predictors of treatment effects.ResultsAnodal ipsilesional tDCS, regardless of the target area (occipital vs. parietal), speeds up and increases daily improvements during the training. Whereas long-lasting (up to 4 months) post-treatment improvements in visual search and ADLs were observed in all groups, a greater and stable increase of visual detections in the blind hemifield was brought about only by the adjuvant use of occipital tDCS.ConclusionsCompensatory audiovisual rehabilitation of HFVDs is effective and benefits from the adjuvant application of occipital and parietal tDCS, which speeds up and increases training-induced improvement.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effects of neurofeedback training combined with transcranial direct current stimulation on motor imagery: A randomized controlled trial
    Sawai, Shun
    Murata, Shin
    Fujikawa, Shoya
    Yamamoto, Ryosuke
    Shima, Keisuke
    Nakano, Hideki
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2023, 17
  • [22] Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation versus Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation as neuromodulatory techniques in stroke rehabilitation
    Fuentes Calderon, Maria Antonia
    Olmedo Jimenez, Laura
    Sanchez Ledesma, Maria Jose
    SIXTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TECHNOLOGICAL ECOSYSTEMS FOR ENHANCING MULTICULTURALITY (TEEM'18), 2018, : 422 - 427
  • [23] The Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Combined With Proprioceptive Training for Blind Individuals: The Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
    Parreira, Rodolfo Borges
    Lopes, Jamile Benite Palma
    Franca, Milena Santana
    Albuquerque, Mayara Bernardo
    Cordeiro, Lorraine Barbosa
    Cardoso, Deborah Carvalho da Silva
    Cimolin, Veronica
    Galli, Manuela
    Oliveira, Claudia Santos
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2020, 11
  • [24] Transcranial direct current stimulation for chronic headaches, a randomized, controlled trial
    Hervik, Jill Angela
    Vika, Karl Solbue
    Stub, Trine
    FRONTIERS IN PAIN RESEARCH, 2024, 5
  • [25] Transcranial direct current stimulation in neglect rehabilitation after stroke: a systematic review
    Gonzalez-Rodriguez, B.
    Serradell-Ribe, N.
    Viejo-Sobera, R.
    Romero-Munoz, J. P.
    Marron, Elena M.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2022, 269 (12) : 6310 - 6329
  • [26] Effect of Anodal Versus Cathodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Stroke Rehabilitation: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
    Khedr, Eman M.
    Shawky, Ola A.
    El-Hammady, Dina H.
    Rothwell, John C.
    Darwish, Essam S.
    Mostafa, Omar M.
    Tohamy, Amal M.
    NEUROREHABILITATION AND NEURAL REPAIR, 2013, 27 (07) : 592 - 601
  • [27] Enhancing vigilance in operators with prefrontal cortex transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)
    Nelson, Jeremy T.
    McKinley, R. Andy
    Golob, Edward J.
    Warm, Joel S.
    Parasuraman, Raja
    NEUROIMAGE, 2014, 85 : 909 - 917
  • [28] Transcranial direct current stimulation in neglect rehabilitation after stroke: a systematic review
    B. González-Rodriguez
    N. Serradell-Ribé
    R. Viejo-Sobera
    J. P. Romero-Muñoz
    Elena M. Marron
    Journal of Neurology, 2022, 269 : 6310 - 6329
  • [29] Long-Lasting Enhancement of Visual Perception with Repetitive Noninvasive Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
    Behrens, Janina R.
    Kraft, Antje
    Irlbacher, Kerstin
    Gerhardt, Holger
    Olma, Manuel C.
    Brandt, Stephan A.
    FRONTIERS IN CELLULAR NEUROSCIENCE, 2017, 11
  • [30] The clinical application of transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with cerebellar ataxia: a systematic review
    Orru, Graziella
    Cesari, Valentina
    Conversano, Ciro
    Gemignani, Angelo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2021, 131 (07) : 681 - 688