Aerodynamic and flutter performance of the bridge deck with various countermeasures using computational fluid dynamics

Aerodynamic layouts of bridge decks considerably affect aerostatic torsional divergence and flutter for bridges. The crucial operation is choosing the optimal bridge deck shape considering the aerodynamic effect. The present study intends to provide a better solution for the flutter control scheme by changing five aspect ratios and four passive aerodynamic countermeasures. The countermeasures are an eccentric wing, inspection rail, down vertical central stabilizer and wind barrier, which have been used for three deck shapes: streamlined, semi-streamline and bluff body sections with large angles of attack. Nowadays, wind barriers are frequently installed on bridges to shield vehicles from the harmful effects of crosswinds, which can influence the flutter characteristics of the bridge. Therefore, the present study contemplates reducing the flutter effect with countermeasures. These countermeasures adversely affect the deck's dynamic stability, mainly manifested in the different divergence forms of the structure. Finally, the eccentric wing, which runs parallel to the bridge deck, increases the critical flutter speed. However, the flow that passes through the eccentric wing extracts considerable energy from the flow field of the countermeasure. Therefore, the framework and solution of the present investigation are sustainable and safe for bridge design.