Strength-duration curves for left bundle branch area pacing

被引:0
|
作者
Kielbasa, Grzegorz [1 ,2 ]
Jastrze, Marek [1 ,3 ]
Bednarek, Agnieszka [1 ,2 ]
Kusiak, Aleksander [1 ]
Sondej, Tomasz [1 ]
Bednarski, Adam [1 ]
Ostrowska, Aleksandra [1 ]
Zydzik, Lukasz [1 ]
Rajzer, Marek [1 ,2 ]
Vijayaraman, Pugazhendhi [1 ,4 ]
Moskal, Pawe
机构
[1] Jagiellonian Univ, Med Coll, Dept Cardiol Intervent Electrocardiol & Hypertens, Krakow, Poland
[2] Univ Hosp Krakow, Dept Cardiol Intervent Electrocardiol & Hypertens, Krakow, Poland
[3] Univ Hosp Krakow, Electrophysiol Lab, Krakow, Poland
[4] Geisinger Heart Inst, Wilkes Barre, PA USA
关键词
Left bundle branch area pacing; Chronaxie; Rheobase; Strength-duration curve; Battery consumption; STIMULATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.05.026
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Despite growing clinical use of left bundle branch pacing (LBBP), data regarding the fundamentals of this pacing modality, including chronaxie and rheobase, are scarce. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to calculate strength-duration curves with chronaxie and rheobase values for LBBP and left ventricular septal pacing (LVSP), and to analyze battery current drain and presence of selective LBBP at very short pulse duration (PD). METHODS A group of 141 patients with permanent LBBP were studied. LBBP and LVSP capture thresholds were assessed at 6 different PDs to calculate the strength-duration curves. Battery current drain at these PDs and presence of selective LBBP were determined. For comparison of strength-duration curves between His-bundle pacing (HBP) and LBBP, source data from our previous work based on 127 patients with HBP were obtained. RESULTS The chronaxies for LBBP and LVSP were very similar (0.38 vs 0.39 ms), and the rheobases were identical (0.27 V). The chronaxie for LBBP was lower than for HBP (0.38 vs 0.53 ms; P <.001), whereas rheobases were similar (0.27 vs 0.26 V). A narrow zone of selective capture was present in 19% and 41% of patients at PD of 0.06 and 0.03 ms, respectively. When pacing with the safety margin of 1 1 V, the lowest battery current drain was achieved with PD of 0.2 ms. CONCLUSION The obtained strength-duration curves for LBBP and LVSP provide insights to optimal programming of left bundle branch area pacing devices with regard to PD, voltage amplitude, battery longevity, and selective capture.
引用
收藏
页码:2262 / 2269
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Immediate clinical outcomes of left bundle branch area pacing vs conventional right ventricular pacing
    Zhang, JunMeng
    Wang, Zefeng
    Cheng, Liting
    Zu, Linna
    Liang, Zhuo
    Hang, Fei
    Wang, Xinlu
    Li, Xiaoyan
    Su, Ruijuan
    Du, Jie
    Wu, Yongquan
    CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 42 (08) : 768 - 773
  • [42] Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing versus Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy on Morbidity and Mortality
    Yixiu Liang
    Zilong Xiao
    Xi Liu
    Jingfeng Wang
    Ziqing Yu
    Xue Gong
    Hongyang Lu
    Shengwen Yang
    Min Gu
    Lei Zhang
    Minghui Li
    Lei Pan
    Xiao Li
    Xueying Chen
    Yangang Su
    Wei Hua
    Junbo Ge
    Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy, 2024, 38 : 471 - 481
  • [43] Late distal conductor fracture of the lumenless pacing lead after left bundle branch area pacing
    Rangaswamy, Vickram Vignesh
    Ponnusamy, Shunmuga Sundaram
    HEART RHYTHM, 2024, 21 (04) : 490 - 491
  • [44] Left bundle branch area pacing prevents pacing induced cardiomyopathy in long-term observation
    Bednarek, Agnieszka
    Kielbasa, Grzegorz
    Moskal, Pawel
    Ostrowska, Aleksandra
    Bednarski, Adam
    Sondej, Tomasz
    Kusiak, Aleksander
    Rajzer, Marek
    Jastrzebski, Marek
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2023, 46 (07): : 629 - 638
  • [45] „Left bundle branch (area) pacing“: Sondenpositionierung und Erfolgskriterien – Schritt für SchrittLeft bundle branch (area) pacing: lead positioning and implant criteria—step for step
    Joern Schmitt
    Till Althoff
    Sonia Busch
    KR Julian Chun
    Tillman Dahme
    Micaela Ebert
    Heidi Estner
    Melanie Gunawardene
    Christian Heeger
    Leon Iden
    Henning Jansen
    Victoria Johnson
    Tilman Maurer
    Andreas Rillig
    Sascha Rolf
    Philipp Sommer
    Daniel Steven
    Richard Roland Tilz
    David Duncker
    Herzschrittmachertherapie + Elektrophysiologie, 2025, 36 (1) : 82 - 90
  • [46] Reversal of pacing-induced cardiomyopathy after left bundle branch area pacing: a case report
    Soonil Kwon
    So-Ryoung Lee
    Eue-Keun Choi
    Seil Oh
    International Journal of Arrhythmia, 24 (1)
  • [47] Sex Differences in Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Versus Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
    Tedrow, Usha B.
    Miranda-Arboleda, Andres F.
    Sauer, William H.
    Duque, Mauricio
    Koplan, Bruce A.
    Marin, Jorge E.
    Aristizabal, Julian M.
    Nino, Cesar D.
    Bastidas, Oriana
    Martinez, Juan M.
    Hincapie, Daniela
    Hoyos, Carolina
    Matos, Carlos D.
    Lopez-Cabanillas, Nestor
    Steiger, Nathaniel A.
    Tadros, Thomas M.
    Zei, Paul C.
    Diaz, Juan C.
    Romero, Jorge E.
    JACC-CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2024, 10 (07) : 1736 - 1749
  • [48] Permanent left bundle branch area pacing improves mitral regurgitation and cardiac function in patients with right bundle branch block
    Ma, Jifang
    Hu, Juan
    Song, Weifeng
    Chen, Ke
    Zang, Xiaobiao
    Zhou, You
    Wang, Xianqing
    Zhao, Yonghui
    Fu, Haixia
    BMC CARDIOVASCULAR DISORDERS, 2024, 24 (01):
  • [49] Left bundle branch area. A new site for physiological pacing: a pilot study
    Das, Asit
    Islam, Sk Sahidul
    Pathak, Sushant Kumar
    Majumdar, Ishita
    Sharwar, Shah Alam
    Saha, Ranita
    Chatterjee, Suman
    HEART AND VESSELS, 2020, 35 (11) : 1563 - 1572
  • [50] Reversible T-wave inversions during left bundle branch area pacing
    Geng, Jie
    Jiang, Zhixin
    Zhang, Shigeng
    Zhou, Xiujuan
    Chen, Yuanyuan
    Chen, Meng
    Chen, Chongchong
    Shan, Qijun
    KARDIOLOGIA POLSKA, 2022, 80 (10) : 1002 - 1009