Strength-duration curves for left bundle branch area pacing

被引:0
|
作者
Kielbasa, Grzegorz [1 ,2 ]
Jastrze, Marek [1 ,3 ]
Bednarek, Agnieszka [1 ,2 ]
Kusiak, Aleksander [1 ]
Sondej, Tomasz [1 ]
Bednarski, Adam [1 ]
Ostrowska, Aleksandra [1 ]
Zydzik, Lukasz [1 ]
Rajzer, Marek [1 ,2 ]
Vijayaraman, Pugazhendhi [1 ,4 ]
Moskal, Pawe
机构
[1] Jagiellonian Univ, Med Coll, Dept Cardiol Intervent Electrocardiol & Hypertens, Krakow, Poland
[2] Univ Hosp Krakow, Dept Cardiol Intervent Electrocardiol & Hypertens, Krakow, Poland
[3] Univ Hosp Krakow, Electrophysiol Lab, Krakow, Poland
[4] Geisinger Heart Inst, Wilkes Barre, PA USA
关键词
Left bundle branch area pacing; Chronaxie; Rheobase; Strength-duration curve; Battery consumption; STIMULATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.05.026
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Despite growing clinical use of left bundle branch pacing (LBBP), data regarding the fundamentals of this pacing modality, including chronaxie and rheobase, are scarce. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to calculate strength-duration curves with chronaxie and rheobase values for LBBP and left ventricular septal pacing (LVSP), and to analyze battery current drain and presence of selective LBBP at very short pulse duration (PD). METHODS A group of 141 patients with permanent LBBP were studied. LBBP and LVSP capture thresholds were assessed at 6 different PDs to calculate the strength-duration curves. Battery current drain at these PDs and presence of selective LBBP were determined. For comparison of strength-duration curves between His-bundle pacing (HBP) and LBBP, source data from our previous work based on 127 patients with HBP were obtained. RESULTS The chronaxies for LBBP and LVSP were very similar (0.38 vs 0.39 ms), and the rheobases were identical (0.27 V). The chronaxie for LBBP was lower than for HBP (0.38 vs 0.53 ms; P <.001), whereas rheobases were similar (0.27 vs 0.26 V). A narrow zone of selective capture was present in 19% and 41% of patients at PD of 0.06 and 0.03 ms, respectively. When pacing with the safety margin of 1 1 V, the lowest battery current drain was achieved with PD of 0.2 ms. CONCLUSION The obtained strength-duration curves for LBBP and LVSP provide insights to optimal programming of left bundle branch area pacing devices with regard to PD, voltage amplitude, battery longevity, and selective capture.
引用
收藏
页码:2262 / 2269
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] His bundle pacing and left bundle branch area pacing: Feasibility and safety
    Saleiro, Carolina
    Sousa, Pedro A.
    Nogueira, Catarina
    Mota, Lidia
    Almeida, Claudia
    Braganca, Gisela
    Paisana, Francisco
    REVISTA PORTUGUESA DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2023, 42 (08) : 683 - 691
  • [2] Lowering the threshold for left bundle branch area pacing
    Cerbin, Lukasz P.
    Garg, Lohit
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2022, 33 (07) : 1537 - 1539
  • [3] Clinical outcomes of left bundle branch area pacing compared to His bundle pacing
    Vijayaraman, Pugazhendhi
    Rajakumar, Clement
    Naperkowski, Angela M.
    Subzposh, Faiz A.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2022, 33 (06) : 1234 - 1243
  • [4] Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing for LBBB Will Left Ventricular Septal Pacing Do?
    Friedman, Daniel J.
    Chelu, Mihail G.
    JACC-CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2024, 10 (10) : 2247 - 2249
  • [5] Septal scar as a barrier to left bundle branch area pacing
    Ali, Nadine
    Arnold, Ahran D.
    Miyazawa, Alejandra A.
    Keene, Daniel
    Peters, Nicholas S.
    Kanagaratnam, Prapa
    Qureshi, Norman
    Ng, Fu Siong
    Linton, Nick W. F.
    Lefroy, David C.
    Francis, Darrel P.
    Lim, Phang Boon
    Kellman, Peter
    Tanner, Mark A.
    Muthumala, Amal
    Shun-Shin, Matthew
    Whinnett, Zachary I.
    Cole, Graham D.
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2023, 46 (09): : 1077 - 1084
  • [6] Closed loop stimulation in left bundle branch area pacing
    Dell'Era, Gabriele
    Ghiglieno, Chiara
    De Vecchi, Federica
    Santagostino, Matteo
    Annunziata, Lucia
    Baldassarre, Irene
    Giacopelli, Daniele
    Patti, Giuseppe
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2024, 47 (09): : 1276 - 1279
  • [7] Left bundle branch area pacing in children: case series
    Jedrzejczyk-Patej, Ewa
    Mazurek, Michal
    Kowalski, Oskar
    Szulik, Mariola
    Tyc, Filip
    Pietruczuk, Armin
    Lenarczyk, Radoslaw
    Kalarus, Zbigniew
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-CASE REPORTS, 2025, 9 (02)
  • [8] Feasibility of His bundle pacing and atrioventricular junction ablation with left bundle branch area pacing as backup
    Mahajan, Ankit
    Trivedi, Rohan
    Subzposh, Faiz A.
    Vijayaraman, Pugazhendhi
    HEART RHYTHM, 2024, 21 (07) : 1180 - 1181
  • [9] Cardiac resynchronization therapy by left bundle branch area pacing in patients with heart failure and left bundle branch block
    Zhang, Weiwei
    Huang, Jingjuan
    Qi, Yiding
    Wang, Fei
    Guo, Lina
    Shi, Xuerui
    Wu, Weihua
    Zhou, Xiaohong
    Li, Ruogu
    HEART RHYTHM, 2019, 16 (12) : 1783 - 1790
  • [10] Comparison of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing and Biventricular Pacing in Candidates for Resynchronization Therapy
    Vijayaraman, Pugazhendhi
    Sharma, Parikshit S.
    Cano, Oscar
    Ponnusamy, Shunmuga Sundaram
    Herweg, Bengt
    Zanon, Francesco
    Jastrzebski, Marek
    Zou, Jiangang
    Chelu, Mihail G.
    Vernooy, Kevin
    Whinnett, Zachary I.
    Nair, Girish M.
    Molina-Lerma, Manuel
    Curila, Karol
    Zalavadia, Dipen
    Haseeb, Abdul
    Dye, Cicely
    Vipparthy, Sharath C.
    Brunetti, Ryan
    Moskal, Pawel
    Ross, Alexandra
    van Stipdonk, Antonius
    George, Jerin
    Qadeer, Yusuf K.
    Mumtaz, Mishal
    Kolominsky, Jeffrey
    Zahra, Syeda A.
    Golian, Mehrdad
    Marcantoni, Lina
    Subzposh, Faiz A.
    Ellenbogen, Kenneth A.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2023, 82 (03) : 228 - 241