Combining ability of soybean in F1 and F2 generations for earliness and grain yield

被引:0
|
作者
Santos, Michelle S. [1 ]
Hamawaki, Osvaldo T. [2 ]
Gomes, Bruno H. [2 ]
Gastl Filho, Josef [3 ]
de Oliveira, Matheus B. [1 ]
da Silva, Amanda C. [4 ]
de Faria, Marcos V. [2 ]
Nogueira, Ana P. O. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Uberlandia, Postgrad Program Genet & Biochem, Uberlandia, MG, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Uberlandia, Uberlandia, MG, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Uberlandia, Postgrad Program Agron, Uberlandia, MG, Brazil
[4] Univ Estado Minas Gerais, Ituiutaba, MG, Brazil
关键词
Diallel crosses; Genetic improvement; Parental selection;
D O I
10.1590/1983-21252025v3812487rc
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Parental selection is a key step in genetic improvement programs, as it impacts the genetic potential of the segregating population and the genetic progress that can be achieved. This selection can be made through predictive or diallel analyses, which estimate general (GCA) and specific combining abilities (SCA). This study evaluated F-1 and F-2 soybean (Glycine max) populations derived from diallel crosses to select parents for traits related to earliness, production components, and grain yield. Fifteen treatments were analyzed in a randomized complete block design, including 10 biparental combinations and 5 parent lines (TMG 801, TMG 803, BRS 511, UFUS 7101, and UFUS 7201). Traits assessed were days to flowering and maturity, plant height at maturity, height of first-pod insertion, number of nodes at maturity, branched nodes, productive nodes, pods with one, two, and three grains, total pods per plant, seeds per pod, and grain yield. Results indicated that evaluating the F1 generation was sufficient, as parent characteristics were consistent in the F2 generation. The diallel analysis identified promising combinations for reducing the growth cycle and increasing productivity and grain yield. BRS 511 x TMG 803, UFUS 7201 x TMG 803, and TMG 803 x UFUS 7101 showed the greatest potential.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] “F2=F1”有可能吗?
    郭家荣
    物理教学探讨, 2008, (21) : 43 - 43
  • [32] STRUCTURE OF PROSTAGLANDIN E, F1 AND F2
    BERGSTROM, S
    RYHAGE, R
    SJOVALL, J
    SAMUELSSON, B
    ACTA CHEMICA SCANDINAVICA, 1962, 16 (02): : 501 - &
  • [33] A paternal hypercaloric diet affects the metabolism and fertility of F1 and F2 Wistar rat generations
    Oshio, Leonardo Toshio
    Andreazzi, Ana Eliza
    Lopes, Jessica Ferraz
    de Sa, Jackson Pereira
    Bolotari, Mariana
    Costa, Vinicius Moreira Goncalves
    Guerra, Martha de Oliveira
    Peters, Vera Maria
    JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENTAL ORIGINS OF HEALTH AND DISEASE, 2020, 11 (06) : 653 - 663
  • [34] Protein profiling in F1 and F2 generations of two tomato genotypes differing in ripening time
    Rodriguez, G. R.
    Sequin, L.
    Pratta, G. R.
    Zorzoli, R.
    Picardi, L. A.
    BIOLOGIA PLANTARUM, 2008, 52 (03) : 548 - 552
  • [35] Heterosis estimates in F1 and F2 generations for economic traits in opium poppy (Papaver somniferum)
    Shukla, S
    Singh, SP
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2000, 70 (10): : 707 - 710
  • [36] THE EFFECT OF SELECTION ON YIELD IN F2, F3 GENERATIONS OF WHEAT
    MATUZ, J
    SHAMKIE, JA
    MESTERHAZY, A
    CEREAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 1992, 20 (1-2) : 25 - 32
  • [37] ESTIMATES OF GENERAL AND SPECIFIC COMBINING ABILITY IN F1 HYBRIDS FOR GRAIN YIELD AND ITS COMPONENTS IN GRAIN SORGHUM SORGHUM VULGARE PERS
    BEIL, GM
    ATKINS, RE
    CROP SCIENCE, 1967, 7 (03) : 225 - &
  • [38] The effect of parent's germplasm on yield components of F1, F2 and F3 generations of pepper hybrids (Capsicum annuum L.)
    Zecevic, B.
    Djordjevic, R.
    Pavlovic, N.
    Mijatovic, M.
    Markovic, Z.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE IIIRD BALKAN SYMPOSIUM ON VEGETABLE AND POTATOES, 2007, (729): : 95 - +
  • [39] On iteration invariants for (F1, F2)-sensitivity and weak (F1, F2)-sensitivity of non-autonomous discrete systems
    Ma, Cuina
    Zhu, Peiyong
    Li, Risong
    JOURNAL OF NONLINEAR SCIENCES AND APPLICATIONS, 2016, 9 (11): : 5772 - 5779
  • [40] Plant density affects the reliability of using F1 and F2 yield to predict F3 yield in barley
    Kotzamanidis, ST
    Roupakias, DG
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 2004, 55 (09): : 961 - 965