A Two-Step Q-Matrix Estimation Method

被引:1
作者
Kohn, Hans-Friedrich [1 ]
Chiu, Chia-Yi [2 ]
Oluwalana, Olasumbo [3 ]
Kim, Hyunjoo [1 ]
Wang, Jiaxi
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Champaign, IL USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Teachers Coll, Columbia, MD USA
[3] Educ Testing Serv, Princeton, NJ USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
cognitive diagnosis; cognitive diagnostic models; factor analysis; Q-matrix refinement and validation; Q-matrix estimation; Markov chain Monte Carlo; mean recovery rate; relative Patternwise; DIAGNOSTIC CLASSIFICATION MODELS; DINA MODEL; SELECTION; FIT;
D O I
10.1177/01466216241284418
中图分类号
O1 [数学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
Cognitive Diagnosis Models in educational measurement are restricted latent class models that describe ability in a knowledge domain as a composite of latent skills an examinee may have mastered or failed. Different combinations of skills define distinct latent proficiency classes to which examinees are assigned based on test performance. Items of cognitively diagnostic assessments are characterized by skill profiles specifying which skills are required for a correct item response. The item-skill profiles of a test form its Q-matrix. The validity of cognitive diagnosis depends crucially on the correct specification of the Q-matrix. Typically, Q-matrices are determined by curricular experts. However, expert judgment is fallible. Data-driven estimation methods have been developed with the promise of greater accuracy in identifying the Q-matrix of a test. Yet, many of the extant methods encounter computational feasibility issues either in the form of excessive amounts of CPU times or inadmissible estimates. In this article, a two-step algorithm for estimating the Q-matrix is proposed that can be used with any cognitive diagnosis model. Simulations showed that the new method outperformed extant estimation algorithms and was computationally more efficient. It was also applied to Tatsuoka's famous fraction-subtraction data. The paper concludes with a discussion of theoretical and practical implications of the findings.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 28
页数:26
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2007, ANN M NAT COUNC MEAS
[2]   Relative and Absolute Fit Evaluation in Cognitive Diagnosis Modeling [J].
Chen, Jinsong ;
Torre, Jimmy ;
Zhang, Zao .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT, 2013, 50 (02) :123-140
[3]   Bayesian Estimation of the DINA Q matrix [J].
Chen, Yinghan ;
Culpepper, Steven Andrew ;
Chen, Yuguo ;
Douglas, Jeffrey .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 2018, 83 (01) :89-108
[4]   A Sparse Latent Class Model for Cognitive Diagnosis [J].
Chen, Yinyin ;
Culpepper, Steven ;
Liang, Feng .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 2020, 85 (01) :121-153
[5]   Statistical Analysis of Q-Matrix Based Diagnostic Classification Models [J].
Chen, Yunxiao ;
Liu, Jingchen ;
Xu, Gongjun ;
Ying, Zhiliang .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2015, 110 (510) :850-866
[6]   Statistical Refinement of the Q-Matrix in Cognitive Diagnosis [J].
Chiu, Chia-Yi .
APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2013, 37 (08) :598-618
[7]   Cluster Analysis for Cognitive Diagnosis: Theory and Applications [J].
Chiu, Chia-Yi ;
Douglas, Jeffrey A. ;
Li, Xiaodong .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 2009, 74 (04) :633-665
[8]  
Chung M., 2014, ESTIMATING Q MATRIX
[9]   A Gibbs sampling algorithm that estimates the Q-matrix for the DINA model [J].
Chung, Mengta .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 93
[10]  
Close C. N., 2012, DOCTORAL DISSERTATIO