Trends in the Care of Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer in the Modern Era of Chemotherapy

被引:0
|
作者
Thomas, Alexander S. [1 ]
Tehranifar, Parisa [2 ,3 ]
Kwon, Wooil [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Shridhar, Nupur [1 ]
Sugahara, Kazuki N. [1 ]
Schrope, Beth A. [1 ]
Chabot, John A. [1 ]
Manji, Gulam A. [6 ,7 ]
Genkinger, Jeanine M. [2 ,3 ]
Kluger, Michael D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Irving Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Div Gastrointestinal & Endocrine Surg, New York, NY 10032 USA
[2] Herbert Irving Comprehens Canc Ctr Canc Populat Sc, New York, NY USA
[3] Columbia Univ, Mailman Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, New York, NY USA
[4] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Surg, Seoul, South Korea
[5] Seoul Natl Univ, Canc Res Inst, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[6] Columbia Univ, Irving Med Ctr, Div Hematol & Oncol, New York, NY USA
[7] Herbert Irving Comprehens Canc Ctr, New York, NY USA
关键词
access to care; guideline recommended treatment; healthcare utilization; pancreatic cancer; pancreatic neoplasms; socioeconomic disparities in health; IRREVERSIBLE ELECTROPORATION; RACIAL DISPARITIES; HEALTH-CARE; ADENOCARCINOMA PATIENTS; SOCIOECONOMIC-STATUS; NEOADJUVANT THERAPY; PHASE-III; CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; GEMCITABINE; RESECTION;
D O I
10.1002/jso.27851
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction: Current guidelines for treatment for locally advanced pancreatic cancer recommend chemotherapy +/- radiation, or radiation alone when multimodal therapy is contraindicated. In a subset of patients, guideline-recommended treatment (GRT) achieves sufficient response to qualify for potentially curative resection. This study evaluated trends in treatment utilization and aimed to identify barriers to GRT. Methods: Patients with clinical T4M0 disease in the National Cancer Database from 2010 to 2017 were included. Potential predictors were assessed by relative risk regression with Poisson distribution and compared by log-link function. Results: In total, 28 056 patients met the criteria. Among 17 059 (67.67%) patients treated primarily with chemotherapy, 41.19% also had radiation and 8.89% went onto resection. Many received no cancer-directed treatment or failed to receive GRT. Another 710 patients had radiation (+/- surgery) without chemotherapy despite few contraindications to chemotherapy. Over time, patients were more likely to undergo resection after chemotherapy (aRR = 1.58; p < 0.0001) and less likely to have chemoradiation (aRR = 0.78; p < 0.0001) or go untreated (aRR = 0.90; p < 0.0001). Socioeconomic factors (race, education, income, and insurance status) affected the likelihood of receiving chemotherapy and surgery. Median overall survival (OS) was significantly improved for patients treated with chemotherapy and particularly in those patients who went on to receive RT or undergo surgical resection. OS was also longer for patients treated at high-volume academic centers. Patients insured by Medicaid, Medicare, or those without insurance had worse OS. Conclusions: Despite improvement over time, many patients go untreated. Clinical factors were influential, but the impact of vulnerable social standing suggests persistent inequity in access to care.
引用
收藏
页码:1589 / 1604
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Irreversible electroporation of locally advanced pancreatic cancer
    Kwon, Wooil
    Thomas, Alexander
    Kluger, Michael D.
    SEMINARS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 48 (01) : 84 - 94
  • [2] Resection of Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer without Regression of Arterial Encasement After Modern-Era Neoadjuvant Therapy
    Kluger, Michael D.
    Rashid, M. Farzan
    Rosario, Vilma L.
    Schrope, Beth A.
    Steinman, Jonathan A.
    Hecht, Elizabeth M.
    Chabot, John A.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2018, 22 (02) : 235 - 241
  • [3] Locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a reliable contraindication to resection in the modern era?
    Fromer, Marc W.
    Wilson, Khaleel D.
    Philips, Prejesh
    Egger, Michael E.
    Scoggins, Charles R.
    McMasters, Kelly M.
    Martin, Robert C. G.
    HPB, 2022, 24 (10) : 1789 - 1795
  • [4] Current Approaches to the Management of Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
    Malinosky, Hannah R. R.
    Stewart, John H. H.
    Moaven, Omeed
    CURRENT SURGERY REPORTS, 2023, 11 (10) : 260 - 269
  • [5] Comparison of Survival Between Irreversible Electroporation Followed by Chemotherapy and Chemotherapy Alone for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
    He, Chaobin
    Huang, Xin
    Zhang, Yu
    Cai, Zhiyuan
    Lin, Xiaojun
    Li, Shengping
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2020, 10
  • [6] The Synergistic Role of Irreversible Electroporation and Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
    Gyftopoulos, Argyrios
    Ziogas, Ioannis A.
    Barbas, Andrew S.
    Moris, Dimitrios
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [7] Modeling combined chemotherapy and particle therapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer
    Durante, Marco
    Tommasino, Francesco
    Yamada, Shigeru
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2015, 5
  • [8] Optimizing the management of locally advanced pancreatic cancer with a focus on induction chemotherapy: Expert opinion based on a review of current evidence
    Seufferlein, Thomas
    Hammel, Pascal
    Delpero, Jean Robert
    Macarulla, Teresa
    Pfeiffer, Per
    Prager, Gerald W.
    Reni, Michele
    Falconi, Massimo
    Philip, Philip A.
    Van Cutsem, Eric
    CANCER TREATMENT REVIEWS, 2019, 77 : 1 - 10
  • [9] Selecting surgical candidates with locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a review for modern pancreatology
    Wu, Y. H. Andrew
    Oba, Atsushi
    Lin, Ronggui
    Watanabe, Shuichi
    Meguid, Cheryl
    Schulick, Richard D.
    Del Chiaro, Marco
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 12 (05) : 2475 - 2483
  • [10] Regional Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: RECLAP Trial
    Jeremy L Davis
    Prakash Pandalai
    R Taylor Ripley
    Russell C Langan
    Seth M Steinberg
    Melissa Walker
    Mary Ann Toomey
    Elliot Levy
    Itzhak Avital
    Trials, 12