Uranium mining remediation, environmental assessment, and bureaucratic violence environmental sociology

被引:0
作者
Brannon, Monica M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Pk Univ, Dept Polit & Adm, Parkville, MO 64152 USA
关键词
Environmental justice; remediation; settler colonialism; environmental assessment; uranium mining; nuclear power; bureaucratic violence; SETTLER COLONIALISM; IMPACT ASSESSMENT; JUSTICE; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.1080/23251042.2024.2417443
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The US government has called for increased uranium mining to support nuclear energy as a replacement for fossil fuels. At the same time, remediating historical mines has been challenging, leaving Indigenous communities suffering as they fight for the removal of harmful mining waste from decades past. Examining two projects and their environmental assessments in the Navajo Nation, this study identifies how settler colonialism extends through state decision-making in the push for nuclear power. Promoting environmental justice, yet approving licenses for new mines and waste storage in Indigenous communities, constitutes a form of bureaucratic violence in which policies and procedures legitimate harm. State power is extended through claims of scientific legitimacy and participatory process, while defending decisions as just. The analysis of these processes shows how past land dispossession leads to forever environmental, ecological, and social damage under the guise of regulatory protection.
引用
收藏
页码:186 / 197
页数:12
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]  
20th Navajo Nation Council, 2005, ACT RELATING RESOURC
[2]   Towards nuclear geography: Zones, bodies, and communities [J].
Alexis-Martin, Becky ;
Davies, Thom .
GEOGRAPHY COMPASS, 2017, 11 (09)
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1994, Reflexive modernization
[4]  
[Anonymous], TREATY US NAVAJO TRI
[5]   Federal Statutes and Environmental Justice in the Navajo Nation: The Case of Fracking in the Greater Chaco Region [J].
Atencio, Mario ;
James-Tohe, Hazel ;
Sage, Samuel ;
Tsosie, David J. ;
Beasley, Ally ;
Grant, Soni ;
Seamster, Teresa .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 112 (01) :116-123
[6]  
Atomic Safety Board Hearing U.S. of America Nuclear Regulatory Commission Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, 1999, INTERVENORS WRITTEN
[7]  
Bacon J.M., 2018, ENVIRON SOCIOL, V5, P59, DOI DOI 10.1080/23251042.2018.1474725
[8]   Extracting knowledge: Social science, environmental impact assessment, and Indigenous consultation in the oil sands of Alberta, Canada [J].
Baker, Janelle Marie ;
Westman, Clinton N. .
EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND SOCIETY-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2018, 5 (01) :144-153
[9]   The state of environmental justice analyses in NEPA: The case of Arizona [J].
Becker-Turk, David ;
de Somocurcio, Gabriela McCrossan Ruiz ;
Garwood, Addison ;
Karwat, Darshan M. A. .
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2023, 99
[10]   Living on with Sellafield: Nuclear infrastructure, slow violence, and the politics of quiescence [J].
Bickerstaff, Karen .
TRANSACTIONS OF THE INSTITUTE OF BRITISH GEOGRAPHERS, 2022, 47 (04) :955-970