Assessing academic language in tenth grade essays using natural language processing

被引:1
作者
Potter, Andrew [1 ]
Shortt, Mitchell [2 ]
Goldshtein, Maria [1 ]
Roscoe, Rod D. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Learning Engn Inst, POB 874303, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[2] Arizona State Univ, Dept Psychol, Tempe, AZ USA
[3] Arizona State Univ, Polytech Sch, Ira A Fulton Sch Engn, Tempe, AZ USA
关键词
Academic language; Natural language processing; Writing assessment; Writing quality; LINGUISTIC FEATURES; LEXICAL SOPHISTICATION; SYNTACTIC COMPLEXITY; WRITING QUALITY; ORGANIZATION; PERSPECTIVE; LITERACY; SUPPORT; SCIENCE; WRITERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.asw.2025.100921
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Broadly defined, academic language (AL) is a set of lexical-grammatical norms and registers commonly used in educational and academic discourse. Mastery of academic language in writing is an important aspect of writing instruction and assessment. The purpose of this study was to use Natural Language Processing (NLP) tools to examine the extent to which features related to academic language explained variance in human-assigned scores of writing quality in a large corpus of source-based argumentative essays (n = 20,820) written by 10th grade students. Using NLP tools, we identified and then calculated linguistic features from essays related to the lexical, syntactic, cohesion, and rhetorical features of academic language. Consistent with prior research findings, results from a hierarchical linear regression revealed that AL features explained 8 % of variance in writing quality when controlling for essay length. The most important AL features included cohesion with the source text, academic wording, and global cohesion. Implications for integrating NLP-produced measures of AL in writing assessment and automated writing evaluation (AWE) systems are discussed.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 121 条
[1]  
Allen L.K., 2016, Handbook of writing research, V2nd, P316, DOI DOI 10.1007/S11145-008-9121-2
[2]   The secret life of connectives: a taxonomy to study individual differences in mid-adolescents' use of connectives in writing to persuade [J].
Andreev, Linda ;
Uccelli, Paola .
READING AND WRITING, 2024, 37 (01) :173-204
[3]  
Anstrom K., 2010, A review of the literature on Academic English: Implications for K-12 English language learners
[4]   Specifying the Academic Language Skills That Support Text Understanding in the Middle Grades: The Design and Validation of the Core Academic Language Skills Construct and Instrument [J].
Barr, Christopher D. ;
Uccelli, Paola ;
Galloway, Emily Phillips .
LANGUAGE LEARNING, 2019, 69 (04) :978-1021
[5]  
Beacco J.C., 2002, SAGE PUBLICATIONS, V4, P277, DOI DOI 10.1177/14614456020040030201
[6]   Syntactic complexity as a predictor of adolescent writing quality: Which measures? Which genre? [J].
Beers, Scott F. ;
Nagy, William E. .
READING AND WRITING, 2009, 22 (02) :185-200
[7]  
Biancarosa G., 2004, READING NEXT VISION
[8]  
Biber D., 2016, Grammatical complexity in academic English: Linguistic change in writing
[9]   Exploring the longitudinal development of grammatical complexity in the disciplinary writing of L2-English university students [J].
Biber, Douglas ;
Reppen, Randi ;
Staples, Shelley ;
Egbert, Jesse .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LEARNER CORPUS RESEARCH, 2020, 6 (01) :38-71
[10]  
Bulte B., 2012, Defining and operationalising L2 complexity, P21, DOI DOI 10.1075/LLLT.32.02BUL