Augmented Reality Navigation System Enhances the Accuracy of Spinal Surgery Pedicle Screw Placement: A Randomized, Multicenter, Parallel-Controlled Clinical Trial

被引:0
作者
Ma, Yichao [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Jiangpeng [2 ]
Dong, Yanlong [3 ]
Tang, Hongmei [1 ]
Ma, Xiaojun [2 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Univ Tradit Chinese Med, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Med, Shanghai Gen Hosp, Dept Orthoped, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Linyan Med Technol Co Ltd, Shanghai, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
accuracy; augmented reality; navigation; pedicle screw; thoracolumbar spine; IMAGE GUIDANCE; FLUOROSCOPY;
D O I
10.1111/os.14295
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective The pedicle screw insertion technique has evolved significantly, and despite the challenges of precise placement, advancements like AR-based surgical navigation systems now offer enhanced accuracy and safety in spinal surgery by integrating real-time, high-resolution imaging with virtual models to aid surgeons. This study aims to evaluate the differences in accuracy between novel AR-guided pedicle screw insertion and conventional surgery techniques. Methods A randomized controlled trial was conducted from March 2019 to December 2023 to compare the efficacy of AR-guided pedicle screw fixation with conventional freehand surgery using CT guidance. The study included 150 patients, aged 18-75, with 75 patients in each group. The total number of pedicle screws planned for the clinical trial placement was 351 and 348 in the experimental and control groups. The safety and efficacy of the procedures were evaluated by assessing screw placement accuracy and complication rates. Results In the full analysis set (FAS) analysis, the difference in the excellent and good rates of screw placement (experimental group - control group) and 95% confidence interval was 6.3% [3.0%-9.8%], with a p value of 0.0003 for the superiority test. In the FAS sensitivity analysis, the success rate was 98.0% (344 out of 351) in the experimental group and 91.7% (319 out of 348) in the control group, with a difference and 95% confidence interval of 6.3% [2.9% and 9.8%, respectively]. In the per-protocol set (PPS) analysis, the difference in the excellent and good rates of screw placement between the experimental and control groups, and the 95% confidence interval was 6.4% [3.3%-9.5%], with a p value of 0.0001 for the superiority test. In the actual treatment set (ATS) analysis, the excellent and good rates of screw placement were 99.1% in the experimental group and 91.7% in the control group. The difference in the excellent and good rates of screw placement (experimental group - control group) and 95% confidence interval was 7.3% [4.1%-10.6%], with a p value of < 0.0001 for the superiority test. Conclusions The AR surgical navigation system can improve the accuracy of pedicle screw implantation and provide precise guidance for surgeons during pedicle screw insertion.
引用
收藏
页码:631 / 643
页数:13
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] Comparison of three imaging and navigation systems regarding accuracy of pedicle screw placement in a sawbone model
    Beisemann, Nils
    Gierse, Jula
    Mandelka, Eric
    Hassel, Frank
    Gruetzner, Paul A.
    Franke, Jochen
    Vetter, Sven Y.
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [2] BOUCHER HH, 1959, J BONE JOINT SURG BR, V41, P248
  • [3] A Pilot Human Cadaveric Study on Accuracy of the Augmented Reality Surgical Navigation System for Thoracolumbar Pedicle Screw Insertion Using a New Intraoperative Rapid Registration Method
    Cao, Bing
    Yuan, Bo
    Xu, Guofeng
    Zhao, Yin
    Sun, Yanqing
    Wang, Zhiwei
    Zhou, Shengyuan
    Xu, Zheng
    Wang, Yao
    Chen, Xiongsheng
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, 2023, 36 (04) : 1919 - 1929
  • [4] An effective visualization technique for depth perception in augmented reality-based surgical navigation
    Choi, Hyunseok
    Cho, Byunghyun
    Masamune, Ken
    Hashizume, Makoto
    Hong, Jaesung
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2016, 12 (01) : 62 - 72
  • [5] Eggli S, 1992, Eur Spine J, V1, P109, DOI 10.1007/BF00300937
  • [6] Feasibility and Accuracy of Thoracolumbar Minimally Invasive Pedicle Screw Placement With Augmented Reality Navigation Technology
    Elmi-Terander, Adrian
    Nachabe, Rami
    Skulason, Halldor
    Pedersen, Kyrre
    Soderman, Michael
    Racadio, John
    Babic, Drazenko
    Gerdhem, Paul
    Edstrom, Erik
    [J]. SPINE, 2018, 43 (14) : 1018 - 1023
  • [7] Radiological and clinical differences among three assisted technologies in pedicle screw fixation of adult degenerative scoliosis
    Fan, Yong
    Du, Jin Peng
    Liu, Ji Jun
    Zhang, Jia Nan
    Liu, Shi Chang
    Hao, Ding Jun
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2018, 8
  • [8] Augmented reality in open surgery
    Fida, Benish
    Cutolo, Fabrizio
    di Franco, Gregorio
    Ferrari, Mauro
    Ferrari, Vincenzo
    [J]. UPDATES IN SURGERY, 2018, 70 (03) : 389 - 400
  • [9] Accuracy of pedicle screw placement: a systematic review of prospective in vivo studies comparing free hand, fluoroscopy guidance and navigation techniques
    Gelalis, Ioannis D.
    Paschos, Nikolaos K.
    Pakos, Emilios E.
    Politis, Angelos N.
    Arnaoutoglou, Christina M.
    Karageorgos, Athanasios C.
    Ploumis, Avraam
    Xenakis, Theodoros A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2012, 21 (02) : 247 - 255
  • [10] ACCURACY OF PEDICULAR SCREW PLACEMENT INVIVO
    GERTZBEIN, SD
    ROBBINS, SE
    [J]. SPINE, 1990, 15 (01) : 11 - 14