Barriers and Facilitators to the Use of Wearable Robots as Assistive Devices: Qualitative Study With Older Adults and Physiotherapists

被引:0
作者
Reicherzer, Leah [1 ]
Scheermesser, Mandy [1 ]
Klay, Adrian [1 ,2 ]
Duarte, Jaime E. [3 ]
Graf, Eveline S. [1 ]
机构
[1] ZHAW Zurich Univ Appl Sci, Inst Physiotherapy, Sch Hlth Sci, Katharina Sulzer Pl 9,Postbox, CH-8401 Winterthur, Switzerland
[2] Medbase AG, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] MyoSwiss AG, Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
assistive device; barriers; facilitators; mobility; older adults; wearable robots; TECHNOLOGY; PEOPLE; MOBILITY; ADOPTION;
D O I
10.2196/52676
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Light wearable robots have the potential to assist older adults with mobility impairments in daily life by compensating for age-related decline in lower extremity strength. Physiotherapists may be the first point of contact for older adults with these devices. Objective: The aims of this study were to explore views of older adults and physiotherapists on wearable robots as assistive devices for daily living and to identify the barriers and facilitators to their use. Methods: Six older adults (aged 72-88 years) tested a wearable robot (Myosuit) and participated in semistructured interviews. A focus group with 6 physiotherapists who had a minimum of 5 years of professional experience and specialized in geriatrics was conducted. Data were analyzed using thematic qualitative text analysis. Results: Older adults perceived benefits and had positive use experiences, yet many saw no need to use the technology for themselves. Main barriers and facilitators to its use were the perception of usefulness, attitudes toward technology, ease of use, and environmental factors such as the support received. Physiotherapists named costs, reimbursement schemes, and complexity of the technology as limiting factors. Conclusions: A light wearable robot-the Myosuit-was found to be acceptable to study participants as an assistive device. Although characteristics of the technology are important, the use and acceptance by older adults heavily depend on perceived usefulness and need.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] Bechtold U, Stauder N, Fieder M., Let’s walk it: mobility and the perceived quality of life in older adults, Int J Environ Res Public Health, 18, 21, (2021)
  • [2] Webber SC, Porter MM, Menec VH., Mobility in older adults: a comprehensive framework, Gerontologist, 50, 4, pp. 443-450, (2010)
  • [3] Izquierdo M, Merchant RA, Morley JE, Et al., International exercise recommendations in older adults (ICFSR): expert consensus guidelines, J Nutr Health Aging, 25, 7, pp. 824-853, (2021)
  • [4] Talbot LA, Metter EJ, Fleg JL., Leisure-time physical activities and their relationship to cardiorespiratory fitness in healthy men and women 18–95 years old, Med Sci Sports Exerc, 32, 2, (2000)
  • [5] Cunningham C, O' Sullivan R, Caserotti P, Tully MA., Consequences of physical inactivity in older adults: a systematic review of reviews and meta‐analyses, Scand J Med Sci Sports, 30, 5, pp. 816-827, (2020)
  • [6] Steffl M, Bohannon RW, Sontakova L, Tufano JJ, Shiells K, Holmerova I., Relationship between sarcopenia and physical activity in older people: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Clin Interv Aging, 12, pp. 835-845, (2017)
  • [7] Tudor-Locke C, Schuna JM, Barreira TV, Et al., Normative steps/day values for older adults: NHANES 2005-2006, J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci, 68, 11, pp. 1426-1432, (2013)
  • [8] Bertrand K, Raymond MH, Miller WC, Martin Ginis KA, Demers L., Walking aids for enabling activity and participation: a systematic review, Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 96, 12, pp. 894-903, (2017)
  • [9] van Dijsseldonk RB, van Nes IJW, Geurts ACH, Keijsers NLW., Exoskeleton home and community use in people with complete spinal cord injury, Sci Rep, 10, 1, (2020)
  • [10] Graf ES, Bauer CM, Power V, Et al., Basic functionality of a prototype wearable assistive soft exoskeleton for people with gait impairments: a case study, PETRA’18: The 11th PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments Conference, pp. 202-207, (2018)