Single Teeth and Partial Implant Rehabilitations Using Ultra-Hydrophilic Multi-Zone Anodized Surface Implants: A Retrospective Study with 1-Year Follow-Up

被引:0
|
作者
de Araujo Nobre, Miguel [1 ]
Antunes, Carolina [1 ]
Ferro, Ana [2 ]
Lopes, Armando [2 ]
Gouveia, Miguel [2 ]
Nunes, Mariana [2 ]
Santos, Diogo [2 ]
机构
[1] Malo Clin, Res Dev & Educ Dept, Ave Combatentes,43,Level 9, P-1600042 Lisbon, Portugal
[2] Malo Clin, Oral Surg Dept, Ave Combatentes 43,Level 9, P-1600042 Lisbon, Portugal
关键词
dental implants; bone resorption; osseointegration; single-tooth implants; cumulative survival rate; implant-supported dental prosthesis; DENTAL IMPLANTS; IMMEDIATE; MAXILLA;
D O I
10.3390/jcm14010066
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background/Objectives: In the last decades, dental implant surfaces have been evolving to increase success and implant survival rates. More studies evaluating outcomes with implants with ultra-hydrophilic multi-zone anodized surfaces are necessary. The aim of this study is to evaluate the short-term outcome of implants of conical connection with anodized ultra-hydrophilic surfaces for support of single teeth and partial rehabilitations. Methods: In this retrospective study, patients received parallel-walled implants with a gradually anodized surface. The primary outcome measure was implant survival. Secondary outcome measures were marginal bone loss and mechanical and biological complications. This study included 253 conical connection implants with anodized ultra-hydrophilic surfaces, placed in 145 patients (71 males and 74 females; average age: 55.8 years). Sixty patients presented comorbidities, and 19 patients presented smoking habits. Results: Ten patients (15 implants) were lost to follow-up. Two implants failed in two patients, resulting in a cumulative survival rate of 99.2%, with 98.5% and 100% for males and females, respectively, and 99.1% and 100% for single teeth and partial rehabilitations, respectively. The average marginal bone loss was 0.52 mm at 1 year, with 0.60 mm and 0.42 mm for males and females, respectively, and 0.52 mm and 0.50 mm for single teeth and partial rehabilitations, respectively. The rate of mechanical complications was 4.8% and 3.2% at patient and implant levels, respectively. Biological complications occurred in one patient (0.7%) at one implant (0.4%). Conclusions: These results indicate that the use of implants with ultra-hydrophilic multi-zone anodized surfaces for single teeth and partial rehabilitations is viable in the short term.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] Comparison between Bone-Level and Tissue-Level Implants in Immediate-Loading Full-Arch Rehabilitations: A Retrospective Multi-Center 1-Year Follow-Up Study
    Pera, Francesco
    Carossa, Massimo
    Bagnasco, Francesco
    Crupi, Armando
    Ambrogio, Giulia
    Isola, Gaetano
    Menini, Maria
    Pesce, Paolo
    PROSTHESIS, 2023, 5 (04): : 1301 - 1311
  • [2] Buccal bone thickness at dental implants in the aesthetic zone: A 1-year follow-up cone beam computed tomography study
    Slagter, Kirsten W.
    Raghoebar, Gerry M.
    Bakker, Nicolaas A.
    Vissink, Arjan
    Meijer, Henny J. A.
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2017, 45 (01) : 13 - 19
  • [3] Clinical, Radiological, and Aesthetic Outcomes after Placement of a Bioactive-Surfaced Implant with Immediate or Delayed Loading in the Anterior Maxilla: 1-Year Retrospective Follow-Up Study
    Iacono, Roberta
    Mayer, Yaniv
    Marenzi, Gaetano
    Ferreira, Balan Vitor
    Pires, Godoy Eduardo
    Migliorati, Marco
    Bagnasco, Francesco
    PROSTHESIS, 2023, 5 (03): : 610 - 621
  • [4] Somatosensory alterations after single-unit dental implant immediate loading: A 1-year follow-up study
    Herreira-Ferreira, Matheus
    Bonfante, Estevam Augusto
    Conti, Pauloesar Rodrigues
    Araujo-Junior, Everardo Napolea Santana de
    Machado, Camila Moreira
    Alves, Patrick Henry Machado
    Costa, Yuri Martins
    Bonjardim, Leonardo Rigoldi
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2024, 147
  • [5] Immediate functional loading of implants placed with flapless surgery in the edentulous maxilla: 1-year follow-up of a single cohort study
    Cannizzaro, Gioacchino
    Leone, Michele
    Esposito, Marco
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2007, 22 (01) : 87 - 95
  • [6] Marginal Bone Loss in Posterior Implants Placed at Different Levels and Different Prosthetic Designs: A Retrospective Study With a Minimum of 1-Year Follow-Up
    Kasabreh, Najla S.
    Khurshid, Hadyia
    Khan, Musa Q.
    Malaikah, Shima
    Wang, Hom-Lay
    JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2024, 50 (03) : 232 - 237
  • [7] A Prospective Follow-up Study of 44 Mandibular Immediately Loaded Implants Using Resonance Frequency Analysis: Preliminary 1-Year Results
    Moreira Melo, Ana Claudia
    de Freitas, Mauricio Correia
    Bernardes, Sergio Rocha
    de Mattias Sartori, Ivete Aparecida
    Farnezi Bassi, Ana Paula
    Thome, Geninho
    IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2009, 18 (06) : 530 - 538
  • [8] Accuracy comparison between the three-dimensional position of planned and placed implants with flapless fully-guided surgery: 1-year follow-up from a single-cohort retrospective study
    Passarelli, P. C.
    Ferro, M.
    de Angelis, P.
    Papi, P.
    Piccirillo, G. B.
    Desantis, V
    Papa, R.
    Pompa, G.
    D'addona, A.
    JOURNAL OF OSSEOINTEGRATION, 2020, 12 (03) : 229 - 235
  • [9] Peri-implant soft and hard tissue condition after alveolar ridge preservation with beta-tricalcium phosphate/type I collagen in the maxillary esthetic zone: a 1-year follow-up study
    Jurisic, Tamara
    Milic, Marija S.
    Todorovic, Vladimir S.
    Zivkovic, Marko
    Jurisic, Milan
    Milic-Lemic, Aleksandra
    Tihcek-Sojic, Ljiljana
    Brkovic, Bozidar
    VOJNOSANITETSKI PREGLED, 2020, 77 (01) : 22 - 28
  • [10] Impact of Vertical Inter-Implant Distance in Two Adjacent Single-Unit Posterior Implants: A Retrospective Cohort Study With 1-8 Years of Follow-Up
    Gao, Jiayu
    Yang, Yang
    Yang, Xingmei
    Tang, Xuemei
    Qu, Yili
    Wu, Yingying
    Xiang, Lin
    Man, Yi
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2025, 52 (03) : 484 - 497