The Two-Spin Enigma: From the Helium Atom to Quantum Ontology

被引:0
作者
Grangier, Philippe [1 ]
Auffeves, Alexia [2 ]
Farouki, Nayla [3 ]
van den Bossche, Mathias [4 ]
Ezratty, Olivier [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paris Saclay, Inst Opt, CNRS, Lab Charles Fabry,Grad Sch, F-91127 Palaiseau, France
[2] Natl Univ Singapore, Ctr Quantum Technol, MajuLab Int Joint Res Lab, Singapore 117543, Singapore
[3] CHU, Grenoble, France
[4] Thales Alenia Space, 26 Ave JF Champoll, F-31037 Toulouse, France
[5] EPITA Res Lab, 14-16 rue Voltaire, F-94270 Le Kremlin Bicetre, France
关键词
quantum physics; helium; electron spin; contextuality; operator algebra; NONDEMOLITION MEASUREMENTS; MECHANICAL DESCRIPTION; PHYSICAL REALITY;
D O I
10.3390/e26121004
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
The purpose of this article is to provide a novel approach and justification of the idea that classical physics and quantum physics can neither function nor even be conceived without the other-in line with ideas attributed to, e.g., Niels Bohr or Lev Landau. Though this point of view may contradict current common wisdom, we will show that it perfectly fits with empirical evidence, and can be maintained without giving up physical realism. In order to place our arguments in a convenient historical perspective, we will proceed as if we were following the path of a scientific investigation about the demise, or vanishing, of some valuable properties of the two electrons in the helium atom. We will start from experimentally based evidence in order to analyze and explain the physical facts, moving cautiously from a classical to a quantum description, without mixing them up. The overall picture will be that the physical properties of microscopic systems are quantized, as initially shown by Planck and Einstein, and that they are also contextual, i.e., they can be given a physical sense only by embedding a microscopic system within a macroscopic measurement context.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
Aspect Alain, 2015, Physics, V8, DOI 10.1103/Physics.8.123
[2]   Revisiting Born's Rule through Uhlhorn's and Gleason's Theorems [J].
Auffeves, Alexia ;
Grangier, Philippe .
ENTROPY, 2022, 24 (02)
[3]   Extracontextuality and extravalence in quantum mechanics [J].
Auffeves, Alexia ;
Grangier, Philippe .
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 2018, 376 (2123)
[4]   Contexts, Systems and Modalities: A New Ontology for Quantum Mechanics [J].
Auffeves, Alexia ;
Grangier, Philippe .
FOUNDATIONS OF PHYSICS, 2016, 46 (02) :121-137
[5]  
Auffves A., 2018, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A, V376, P20170322
[6]  
Bacciagaluppi G., 2020, STANFORD ENCY PHILOS
[7]  
Barrett J., 2023, Everettian Quantum Mechanics
[8]  
Bell J. S., 1964, Phys. Phys. Fiz., V1, P195, DOI [DOI 10.1103/PHYSICSPHYSIQUEFIZIKA.1.195, 10.1103/Physics-PhysiqueFizika.1.195]
[9]   Quantum cryptography [J].
Gisin, N ;
Ribordy, GG ;
Tittel, W ;
Zbinden, H .
REVIEWS OF MODERN PHYSICS, 2002, 74 (01) :145-195
[10]   Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? [J].
Bohr, N .
PHYSICAL REVIEW, 1935, 48 (08) :696-702