The skin allergy risk assessment-integrated chemical environment (SARA-ICE) defined approach to derive points of departure for skin sensitization

被引:3
作者
Reinke, Emily N. [1 ]
Reynolds, Joe [2 ]
Gilmour, Nicola [2 ]
Reynolds, Georgia [2 ]
Strickland, Judy [1 ]
Germolec, Dori [1 ,3 ]
Allen, David G. [4 ]
Maxwell, Gavin
Kleinstreuer, Nicole C. [3 ]
机构
[1] Inotiv Inc, Morrisville, NC 27560 USA
[2] Unilever Safety & Environm Assurance Ctr, Colworth Sci Pk, Sharnbrook MK44 1LQ, Beds, England
[3] Natl Inst Environm Hlth Sci, Natl Toxicol Program, Div Translat Toxicol, Interagcy Ctr Evaluat Alternat Toxicol Methods, POB 12233, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27709 USA
[4] Int Collaborat Cosmet Safety, New York, NY USA
来源
CURRENT RESEARCH IN TOXICOLOGY | 2025年 / 8卷
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Skin sensitization; Non-animal methodology; Risk assessment; LLNA; Point of departure; Bayesian; Defined approach; Computational toxicology; Defined approach for skin sensitization;
D O I
10.1016/j.crtox.2024.100205
中图分类号
R99 [毒物学(毒理学)];
学科分类号
100405 ;
摘要
Mechanistically based non-animal methods for assessing skin sensitization hazard have been developed, but are not considered sufficient, individually, to conclusively define the skin sensitization potential or potency of a chemical. This resulted in the development of defined approaches (DAs), as documented in OECD TG 497, for combining information sources in a prescriptive manner to provide a determination of risk or potency. However, there are currently no DAs within OECD TG 497 that can derive a point of departure (POD) for risk assessment. The Skin Allergy Risk Assessment - Integrated Chemical Environment (SARA-ICE) DA for skin sensitization is a Bayesian statistical model that estimates a human-relevant metric of sensitizer potency, the ED01, an estimate of the human predictive patch test dermal dose at which there is 1% chance of inducing sensitization, which can be used in a risk assessment paradigm. The model accounts for variability of input data and explicitly quantifies uncertainty. SARA-ICE derives the ED01 from a variety of in vitro and in vivo test method data and is built upon historical human, murine, and in vitro test data for 434 chemicals. In addition to the ED01 POD SARA-ICE DA also provides a Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) classification probability for GHS subcategories 1A, 1B and not classified (NC). Here we describe the SARA-ICE model and its evaluation, including performance versus benchmark PODs. In addition, via a case study with isothiazolinones (ITs), we demonstrate the utility of SARA-ICE for integrating different data inputs and compare the ED01 for six ITs to existing historical data.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2010, OECD Guideline for the Testing of Chemicals No. 442B: Skin Sensitization: Local Lymph Node Assay: BrdU-ELISA
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, OECD SERIES TESTING, DOI DOI 10.1787/9789264221444-EN
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2019, OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, DOI DOI 10.1787/9789264229709-EN
[4]   Updating exposure assessment for skin sensitization quantitative risk assessment for fragrance materials [J].
Api, Anne Marie ;
Basketter, David ;
Bridges, James ;
Cadby, Peter ;
Ellis, Graham ;
Gilmour, Nicola ;
Greim, Helmut ;
Griem, Peter ;
Kern, Petra ;
Khaiat, Alain ;
O'Brien, John ;
Rustemeyer, Thomas ;
Ryan, Cindy ;
Safford, Bob ;
Smith, Benjamin ;
Vey, Matthias ;
White, Ian R. .
REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2020, 118
[5]   Building confidence in skin sensitisation potency assessment using new approach methodologies: report of the 3rd EPAA Partners Forum, Brussels, 28th October 2019 [J].
Basketter, D. ;
Beken, S. ;
Bender, H. ;
Bridges, J. ;
Casati, S. ;
Corvaro, M. ;
Cuvellier, S. ;
Hubesch, B. ;
Irizar, A. ;
Jacobs, M. N. ;
Kern, P. ;
Lamplmair, F. ;
Manou, I ;
Mueller, B. P. ;
Roggeband, R. ;
Rossi, L. H. .
REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2020, 117
[6]   Skin sensitization risk assessment: a comparative evaluation of 3 isothiazolinone biocides [J].
Basketter, DA ;
Rodford, R ;
Kimber, I ;
Smith, I ;
Wahlberg, JE .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1999, 40 (03) :150-154
[7]   An Integrated Chemical Environment to Support 21st-Century Toxicology [J].
Bell, Shannon M. ;
Phillips, Jason ;
Sedykh, Alexander ;
Tandon, Arpit ;
Sprankle, Catherine ;
Morefield, Stephen Q. ;
Shapiro, Andy ;
Allen, David ;
Shah, Ruchir ;
Maull, Elizabeth A. ;
Casey, Warren M. ;
Kleinstreuer, Nicole C. .
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2017, 125 (05)
[8]  
Bureau B.E.M, 2024, Internet
[9]   Amended Safety Assessment of Methylchloroisothiazolinone and Methylisothiazolinone as Used in Cosmetics [J].
Burnett, Christina L. ;
Bergfeld, Wilma F. ;
Belsito, Donald, V ;
Klaassen, Curtis D. ;
Liebler, Daniel C. ;
Marks, James G. ;
Peterson, Lisa A. ;
Shank, Ronald C. ;
Slaga, Thomas J. ;
Snyder, Paul W. ;
Heldreth, Bart .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TOXICOLOGY, 2021, 40 (1_SUPPL) :20S-33S
[10]   Making reliable negative predictions of human skin sensitisation using an in silico fragmentation approach [J].
Chilton, Martyn L. ;
Macmillan, Donna S. ;
Steger-Hartmann, Thomas ;
Hillegass, Jedd ;
Bellion, Phillip ;
Vuorinen, Anna ;
Etter, Sylvain ;
Smith, Benjamin P. C. ;
White, Angela ;
Sterchele, Paul ;
De Smedt, Ann ;
Glogovac, Milica ;
Glowienke, Susanne ;
O'Brien, Devin ;
Parakhia, Rahul .
REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2018, 95 :227-235