Exploring MRI and Mammography Lesion Features for Breast Cancer Detection in PTEN Hamartoma Tumor Syndrome

被引:0
|
作者
Hoxhaj, Alma [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Milants, Annemieke [4 ]
Techanithisawat, Porjai [5 ]
Bult, Peter [6 ]
Hoogerbrugge, Nicoline [7 ,8 ]
Mann, Ritse M. [1 ,2 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Med Imaging, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hosp, Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Radiol, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Radboud Inst Hlth Sci, NL-6525 GA Nijmegen, Netherlands
[4] St Niklaas Vitaz, B-9100 St Niklaas, Belgium
[5] Queen Sirikit Ctr Breast Canc, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
[6] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, NL-6525 GA Nijmegen, Netherlands
[7] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Human Genet, NL-6525 GA Nijmegen, Netherlands
[8] European Reference Network Genet Tumour Risk Syndr, NL-6525 GA Nijmegen, Netherlands
基金
荷兰研究理事会;
关键词
PTEN; PHTS; cancer; breast cancer surveillance; magnetic resonance imaging; mammography; CARCINOMA IN-SITU; IMAGING FEATURES; DUCTAL CARCINOMA; BRCA MUTATION; HIGH-RISK; SOCIETY GUIDELINES; WOMEN; CARRIERS; DENSITY; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.3390/cancers17050856
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
(1) Background/Objectives: Women with PTEN hamartoma tumor syndrome (PHTS) face a significantly increased risk of breast cancer (up to 66%) and a high prevalence of benign breast lesions (30-75%), which can complicate cancer detection and underscore the need for effective surveillance strategies. This study aimed to evaluate the imaging characteristics of breast cancers and benign breast lesions using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and mammography, with the goal of improving early cancer detection, reducing unnecessary biopsies, and guiding future surveillance protocols. (2) Methods: This retrospective single-institution study included 65 PHTS women aged >= 18 years (2001-2021), 39 of whom participated in a high-risk breast cancer surveillance program. Imaging features of breast cancers from MRI and mammography (when available) and of benign breast lesions from MRI only were assessed independently by two breast radiologists and correlated with pathology reports. Sensitivity and performance of MRI and mammography in detecting breast cancers and benign breast lesions were analyzed using descriptive statistics and correlation analyses, with significance set at p < 0.05. (3) Results: Imaging was available for re-evaluation for 17 breast cancers (with MRI available for 10 cases and mammography for 15 cases) diagnosed in 11 women and 31 benign breast lesions (with MRI available for 29 cases and mammography for 26 cases) in 16 women. MRI identified 90% (9/10) of the breast cancers for which it was available as suspicious, with malignant features retrospectively identifiable in 50% of baseline scans. In comparison, mammography identified only 40% (6/15) of breast cancers and was notably less effective in women with dense breast tissue. For benign breast lesions, MRI identified all lesions (29/29), while mammography underperformed, correctly identifying only 58% (15/26). However, ambiguous enhancement features on MRI occasionally posed challenges in distinguishing between benign breast lesions and malignancies. (4) Conclusions: MRI significantly outperformed mammography in accurately characterizing both breast cancers and benign breast lesions in women with PHTS, particularly in younger women with dense breast tissue. These findings reinforce the critical role of MRI as the primary surveillance tool for this high-risk population, given that breast cancers in women with PHTS tend to exhibit typical malignant features on MRI. However, they also highlight the importance of careful interpretation of MRI findings for benign breast lesions and the need for additional strategies to minimize unnecessary interventions.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced breast MRI and gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced breast MRI with mammography and ultrasound for the detection of breast cancer
    Gilbert, Fiona J.
    van den Bosch, Harrie C. M.
    Petrillo, Antonella
    Siegmann, Katja
    Heverhagen, Johannes T.
    Panizza, Pietro
    Gehl, Hans-Bjoern
    Pediconi, Federica
    Diekmann, Felix
    Peng, Wei-Jun
    Ma, Lin
    Sardanelli, Francesco
    Belli, Paolo
    Corcione, Stefano
    Zechmann, Christian M.
    Faivre-Pierret, Matthieu
    Martincich, Laura
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2014, 39 (05) : 1272 - 1286
  • [32] Automated Detection of Breast Tumor in MRI and Comparison of Kinetic Features for Assessing Tumor Response to Chemotherapy
    Aghaei, Faranak
    Tan, Maxine
    Zheng, Bin
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2015: COMPUTER-AIDED DIAGNOSIS, 2015, 9414
  • [33] Mammography features for early markers of aggressive breast cancer subtypes and tumor characteristics: A population-based cohort study
    Tan, Pui San
    Ali, Maya Alsheh
    Eriksson, Mikael
    Hall, Per
    Humphreys, Keith
    Czene, Kamila
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2021, 148 (06) : 1351 - 1359
  • [34] Endoscopic Findings in Patients With PTEN Hamartoma Tumor Syndrome Undergoing Surveillance
    Khare, Anshika
    Burke, Carol A.
    Heald, Brandie
    O'Malley, Margaret
    LaGuardia, Lisa
    Milicia, Susan
    Cruise, Michael
    Eng, Charis
    Mankaney, Gautam
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2022, 56 (03) : E183 - E188
  • [35] Thyroid disease in children and adolescents with PTEN hamartoma tumor syndrome (PHTS)
    Plamper, Michaela
    Schreiner, Felix
    Gohlke, Bettina
    Kionke, Janina
    Korsch, Eckard
    Kirkpatrick, James
    Born, Mark
    Aretz, Stefan
    Woelfle, Joachim
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2018, 177 (03) : 429 - 435
  • [36] PTEN hamartoma tumor syndrome: Clinical risk assessment and management protocol
    Ngeow, Joanne
    Eng, Charis
    METHODS, 2015, 77-78 : 11 - 19
  • [37] Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma Is Associated With PTEN Hamartoma Tumor Syndrome
    Mester, Jessica L.
    Zhou, Ming
    Prescott, Nichole
    Eng, Charis
    UROLOGY, 2012, 79 (05) : 1187.e1 - 1187.e7
  • [38] Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography versus MRI: Initial results in the detection of breast cancer and assessment of tumour size
    Fallenberg, E. M.
    Dromain, C.
    Diekmann, F.
    Engelken, F.
    Krohn, M.
    Singh, J. M.
    Ingold-Heppner, B.
    Winzer, K. J.
    Bick, U.
    Renz, D. M.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2014, 24 (01) : 256 - 264
  • [39] Relative Timing of Mammography and MRI for Breast Cancer Screening: Impact on Performance Evaluation
    Lee, Janie M.
    Ichikawa, Laura E.
    Kerlikowske, Karla
    Buist, Diana S. M.
    Lee, Christoph I.
    Sprague, Brian L.
    Henderson, Louise M.
    Onega, Tracy
    Wernli, Karen J.
    Lowry, Kathryn P.
    Stout, Natasha K.
    Tosteson, Anna N. A.
    Miglioretti, Diana L.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2024, 21 (11) : 1722 - 1732
  • [40] Comparative Effectiveness of Mammography, Ultrasound, and MRI in the Detection of Breast Carcinoma in Dense Breast Tissue: A Systematic Review
    Abu Abeelh, Enas
    Abuabeileh, Zain
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (04)