Single-Center Experience With High-Density Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients With Refractory Angina Pectoris

被引:4
作者
Vervaat, Fabienne E. [1 ]
van Suijlekom, Hans
Wijnbergen, Inge F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Catharina Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Michelangelolaan 2, NL-5623 EJ Eindhoven, Netherlands
来源
NEUROMODULATION | 2024年 / 27卷 / 07期
关键词
High-density stimulation; refractory angina pectoris; spinal cord stimulation; PAIN; SYMPTOMS; BURST;
D O I
10.1016/j.neurom.2022.11.006
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objectives: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a treatment option for patients with refractory angina pectoris (RAP) which was first used in 1987 and led to a reduction in the number of angina pectoris episodes, less consumption of short-acting nitrates, and an improvement in the quality of life. The conventional mode of stimulation leads to paresthesia felt at the target area. In recent years novel modes of stimulation have been developed that are paresthesia free, such as " burst, " "high-density (HD)," or " high- frequency/10 kHz" stimulation. To date, these new modes of stimulation have not been used in patients with RAP and a spinal cord stimulator. This retrospective, single-center, observational study gives a description of the experience of using HD stimulation in selected patients with RAP being treated with SCS.<br /> Materials and Methods: All patients with RAP who received a spinal cord stimulator as treatment at our center from September 2009 to February 2021 were screened. Patients were eligible for inclusion into this retrospective, observational study if 1) patients had used HD stimulation, or 2) were currently using HD stimulation.<br /> Results: Fifty-three patients out of a total of 157 patients who had a spinal cord stimulator due to RAP use or have used HD stimulation. In most patients (79.2%), the reason for switching from conventional to HD stimulation was due to progression of symptoms under conventional stimulation. The average duration of conventional stimulation use prior to switching to HD stimulation was 40.3 (+/- 29.6) months. In total, 26 patients (of 53 patients; 49.1%) were using HD stimulation at the end of the follow-up period or until lost to follow-up, and two patients used both forms of stimulation interchangeably. Five patients (9.4%) had stopped using SCS, and 20 patients (37.7%) switched back to conventional stimulation due to a variety of reasons.<br /> Conclusions: This retrospective study shows that the use of HD stimulation in patients with RAP being treated with SCS could be an alternative option for conventional stimulation. Due to the nature of this study, additional research is essential to confirm these initial findings.
引用
收藏
页码:1234 / 1239
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] Successful Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation in Refractory Angina
    Abusabha, Yousef
    Slotty, Philipp J.
    [J]. NEUROMODULATION, 2019, 22 (02): : 229 - 230
  • [2] 1.2kHzHigh-Frequency Stimulation as a Rescue Therapy in Patients With Chronic Pain Refractory to Conventional Spinal Cord Stimulation
    Andrade, Pablo
    Heiden, Petra
    Visser-Vandewalle, Veerle
    Matis, Georgios
    [J]. NEUROMODULATION, 2021, 24 (03): : 540 - 545
  • [3] Long-term effects of spinal cord stimulation on angina symptoms and quality of life in patients with refractory angina pectoris-results from the European Angina Registry Link Study (EARL)
    Andrell, P.
    Yu, W.
    Gersbach, P.
    Gillberg, L.
    Pehrsson, K.
    Hardy, I.
    Stahle, A.
    Andersen, C.
    Mannheimer, C.
    [J]. HEART, 2010, 96 (14) : 1132 - 1136
  • [4] Immediate and long-term clinical outcome after spinal cord stimulation for refractory stable angina pectoris
    Di Pede, F
    Lanza, GA
    Zuin, G
    Alfieri, O
    Rapati, M
    Romanò, M
    Circo, A
    Cardano, P
    Bellocci, F
    Santini, M
    Maseri, A
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2003, 91 (08) : 951 - 955
  • [5] Thoracic spinal cord stimulation improves functional status and relieves symptoms in patients with refractory angina pectoris:: the first placebo-controlled randomised study
    Eddicks, Stephan
    Maier-Hauff, Klaus
    Schenk, Michael
    Mueller, Andreas
    Baumann, Gert
    Theres, Heinz
    [J]. HEART, 2007, 93 (05) : 585 - 590
  • [6] The Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Spinal Cord Stimulation for Refractory Angina (RASCAL Study): A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
    Eldabe, Sam
    Thomson, Simon
    Duarte, Rui
    Brookes, Morag
    deBelder, Mark
    Raphael, Jon
    Davies, Ed
    Taylor, Rod
    [J]. NEUROMODULATION, 2016, 19 (01): : 60 - 69
  • [7] Spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of refractory angina pectoris: A multicenter randomized single-blind study (the SCS-ITA trial)
    Lanza, Gaetano A.
    Grimaldi, Roberto
    Greco, Salvatore
    Ghio, Stefano
    Sarullo, Filippo
    Zuin, Guerrino
    De Luca, Anna
    Allegri, Massimo
    Di Pede, Francesco
    Castagno, Davide
    Turco, Annalisa
    Sapio, Monica
    Pinato, Giampaolo
    Cioni, Beatrice
    Trevi, Giampaolo
    Crea, Filippo
    [J]. PAIN, 2011, 152 (01) : 45 - 52
  • [8] The problem of chronic refractory angina -: Report from the ESC Joint Study Group on the Treatment of Refractory Angina
    Mannheimer, C
    Camici, P
    Chester, MR
    Collins, A
    DeJongste, M
    Eliasson, T
    Follath, F
    Hellemans, I
    Herlitz, J
    Lüscher, T
    Pasic, M
    Thelle, D
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2002, 23 (05) : 355 - 370
  • [9] DORSAL COLUMN STIMULATION FOR PAIN RELIEF FROM INTRACTABLE ANGINA-PECTORIS
    MURPHY, DF
    GILES, KE
    [J]. PAIN, 1987, 28 (03) : 365 - 368
  • [10] Tonic, Burst, High-Density, and 10-kHz High-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation: Efficiency and Patients' Preferences in a Failed Back Surgery Syndrome Predominant Population. Review of Literature
    Peeters, Jean-Baptiste
    Raftopoulos, Christian
    [J]. WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 144 : E331 - E340