Public value and digital health: The example of guiding values in the national digital health strategy of France

被引:1
作者
Lewerenz, Simon [1 ]
Moen, Anne [2 ,3 ]
Martins, Henrique [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] ISCTE Inst Univ Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
[2] Univ Oslo, Inst Hlth & Soc, Oslo, Norway
[3] Norwegian Ctr Ehlth Res, Tromso, Norway
[4] Univ Beira Interior, Fac Ciencias Saude, Covilha, Portugal
关键词
Public value; Strategy; Public policy; Health policy; Digital health; Healthcare; European Health Data Space; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; CARE-SYSTEM; ETHICS; CYBERSECURITY; CRITERIA;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2025.105794
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Introduction: In the WHO European Region, 44 of 53 reporting Member States (MS) have a national digital health strategy (NDHS) or policy. Their formulation is heterogenous and evolving and should best reflect public common interest. This research aims to explore how a public value approach improves the relevance of digital health policies and services, increasing their capacity to better serve the diverse range of societal interests. It utilises the guiding values within the French NDHS as an example before discussing other digital health policies such as the European Heath Data Space. Methods: Three homogenous focus group discussions were conducted in November and December 2023. Each focus group separately gathered distinct stakeholders: public clients, health professionals, private sector. 19 participants were included in the study. Data collection comprised live polling and semi-structured discussion. Results were analysed considering the pre-defined stakeholder groups and the values discussed during the study. Results: Findings reveal both technical and cultural challenges in digital health that highlight the need for adaptable frameworks across different contexts. Stakeholder insights informed a framework classifying public values into democratic and managerial categories, suggesting themes that may be relevant to digital health strategies in other national and regional settings. Discussion: Public value is discussed as a multidimensional concept, and the plurality of its perceptions give basis for tailored approaches to serve different value-beneficiaries comprehensively. We propose this values-based approach as a systematic model for supra-, sub-, and national scales and additional policy topics, beyond digital health strategies. Conclusion: The study suggests that using a public value lens considering multiple perceptions is valuable for advancing digital health policy in a responsible and ethical manner. Such an approach could promote wider governance of and adoption of digital health. To evolve the framework, application in multiple and large ecosystems at different levels should be considered.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 119 条
[1]   Current evidence on the use of mHealth approaches in Sub-Saharan Africa: A scoping review [J].
Aboye, Genet Tadese ;
Vande Walle, Martijn ;
Simegn, Gizeaddis Lamesgin ;
Aerts, Jean-Marie .
HEALTH POLICY AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 12 (04)
[2]   Public values? A systematic literature review into the outcomes of public service co-creation [J].
Acar, Leon ;
Steen, Trui ;
Verschuere, Bram .
PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2025, 27 (05) :1357-1389
[3]  
Agence Regionale de Sante Grand-Est, 2023, Schema regional de sante 2023-2028
[4]   Qualitative research: its value and applicability [J].
Agius, Steven J. .
PSYCHIATRIC BULLETIN, 2013, 37 (06) :204-206
[5]   Digital health: Cybersecurity is a value creation lever, not only a source of expenditure [J].
Alami, Hassane ;
Gagnon, Marie-Pierre ;
Ahmed, Mohamed Ali Ag ;
Fortin, Jean-Paul .
HEALTH POLICY AND TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 8 (04) :319-321
[6]   Defining the client in the public sector: A social-exchange perspective [J].
Alford, J .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2002, 62 (03) :337-346
[7]  
Alford J., 2009, Public sector, V32, P11, DOI DOI 10.3316/INFORMIT.252794502674020
[8]  
Alford J, 2017, ADM SCI, V7, DOI 10.3390/admsci7040035
[9]  
Anderson M, 2022, United Kingdom: Health System Review
[10]   Health technology assessment [J].
不详 .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2009, 25 :10-10