Certification, Maintenance and Decertification of Standardised Innovation Management Systems: Motivations, Barriers and Benefits

被引:0
作者
de Saboya, Liana Mendes [1 ,2 ]
Candido, Carlos J. F. [1 ,3 ]
Cesario, Marisa Isabel Silva [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Algarve, Fac Econ, Faro, Portugal
[2] CAGECE, Fortaleza, Brazil
[3] CEFAGE UALG, Faro, Portugal
[4] CINTURS, Faro, Portugal
关键词
critical success factors; decertification propensity; innovation; ISO; 56001; 9001; NP; 4457; obstacles; SIMS; UNE; 166002; withdrawal; ISO; 9001; CERTIFICATION; BUSINESS PERFORMANCE; PRODUCT INNOVATION; QUALITY; IMPACT; ISO-9000; FIRMS; INTEGRATION; CAPABILITY;
D O I
10.1111/caim.12655
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The role of standardised innovation management systems (SIMS) in fostering organisational innovation has been largely overlooked in the literature. This study addresses this gap by investigating the certification, maintenance and decertification of SIMS. Using a descriptive and inductive methodology, the research analyses primary data from 94 Portuguese organisations with certified SIMS. The findings reveal a strong prevalence of internal motivations for certification, low implementation obstacles and significant benefits, suggesting that these firms have successfully internalised the SIMS standard into their innovation management processes. Maintenance motivations are also strong, particularly internal ones, which align well with the critical success factors for sustaining certification. The benefits of maintaining SIMS are substantial, particularly internal benefits, as initial external motivations for certification often evolve into internal maintenance motivations. Decertification motivations and propensity are weak among the sample firms. Expectations of negative performance impacts following potential decertification are also low, likely because these organisations have effectively internalised the SIMS standard. This study is the first to explore the maintenance and decertification of SIMS, providing evidence that SIMS can deliver substantial benefits, be efficiently maintained and continuously enhance innovation and competitiveness. As a result, most organisations exhibit little interest in decertification. The findings offer significant contributions to research and provide actionable insights for practitioners, suggesting that innovation management systems can indeed be standardised with considerable benefits.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 103 条
[1]   ISO 9000 maintenance in service organisations: tales from two companies [J].
Ab Wahid, Roslina ;
Corner, James ;
Tan, Peck-Leong .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITY & RELIABILITY MANAGEMENT, 2011, 28 (07) :735-+
[2]   Critical success factors and problems in ISO 9000 maintenance [J].
Ab Wahid, Roslina ;
Corner, James .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITY & RELIABILITY MANAGEMENT, 2009, 26 (09) :881-+
[3]  
AENOR, 2006, UNE 166002 RDI Management System Requirements
[4]   ISO 9001 Standard: Developing and Validating a Survey Instrument [J].
Alberto Sanchez-Lizarraga, Marcos ;
Limon-Romero, Jorge ;
Tlapa, Diego ;
Baez-Lopez, Yolanda ;
Puente, Cesar ;
Puerta-Sierra, Lizbeth ;
Ontiveros, Sinue .
IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 :190677-190688
[5]  
Alfaro E., 2019, The Routledge Companion to Innovation Management
[6]   Impact of ISO 9001 certification cancellation on business performance: a case study in Slovenian organisations [J].
Alic, Milena .
TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT & BUSINESS EXCELLENCE, 2014, 25 (7-8) :790-811
[7]  
Araya N. M. M., 2019, Guidelines for the Implementation of UNE 166000 Standards for RDI Management in the Chilean Municipal Public Sector, P43
[8]  
Badrinas Joan, 2015, International Journal of Innovation Science, V7, P263
[9]   Sustainable human capital: product innovation and employee partnerships in technology firms [J].
Banerjee, Preeta M. .
CROSS CULTURAL MANAGEMENT-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2013, 20 (02) :216-234
[10]   ISO 9000 maintenance measures: the case of a Malaysian local authority [J].
Basir, Siti Arni ;
Davies, John .
TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT & BUSINESS EXCELLENCE, 2018, 29 (1-2) :185-201