Delay Margin Analysis of Uncertain Linear Control Systems Using Probabilistic μ

被引:0
作者
Somers, F. [1 ]
Roos, C. [1 ]
Biannic, J. -m. [1 ]
Sanfedino, F. [2 ]
Preda, V. [3 ]
Bennani, S. [3 ]
Evain, H. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toulouse, DTIS, ONERA, Toulouse, France
[2] ISAE SUPAERO, Toulouse, France
[3] ESA-ESTEC, Noordwijk, Netherlands
[4] CNES, Toulouse, France
关键词
branch-and-bound algorithms; linear fractional representation; probabilistic mu-analysis; robustness analysis; uncertain systems; STABILITY; BOUNDS;
D O I
10.1002/rnc.7780
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Monte Carlo simulations have long been a widely used method in the industry for control system validation. They provide an accurate probability measure for sufficiently frequent phenomena but are often time-consuming and may fail to detect very rare events. Conversely, deterministic techniques such as mu or IQC-based analysis allow fast calculation of worst-case stability margins and performance levels, but in the absence of a probabilistic framework, a control system may be invalidated on the basis of extremely rare events. Probabilistic mu-analysis has therefore been studied since the 1990s to bridge this analysis gap by focusing on rare but nonetheless possible situations that may threaten system integrity. The solution adopted in this paper implements a branch-and-bound algorithm to explore the whole uncertainty domain by dividing it into smaller and smaller subsets. At each step, sufficient conditions involving mu upper bound computations are used to check whether a given requirement-related to the delay margin in the present case-is satisfied or violated on the whole considered subset. Guaranteed bounds on the exact probability of delay margin satisfaction or violation are then obtained, based on the probability distributions of the uncertain parameters. The difficulty here arises from the exponential term e-tau s classically used to represent a delay tau, which cannot be directly translated into the Linear Fractional Representation (LFR) framework imposed by mu-analysis. Two different approaches are proposed and compared in this paper to replace the set of delays e-tau s,tau is an element of[0 phi]. First, an equivalent representation using a rational function with unit gain and phase variations that exactly cover those of the original delays, resulting in an LFR with frequency-dependent uncertainty bounds. Then, Pad & eacute; approximations, whose order is chosen to handle the trade-off between conservatism and complexity. A constructive way to derive minimal LFR from Pad & eacute; approximations of any order is also provided as an additional contribution. The whole method is first assessed on a simple benchmark, and its applicability to realistic problems with a larger number of states and uncertainties is then demonstrated.
引用
收藏
页码:2101 / 2118
页数:18
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
ACKERMANN J, 1990, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 29TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL, VOLS 1-6, P3496, DOI 10.1109/CDC.1990.203453
[2]  
Ackermann J., 1990, Proceedings of the 1990 American Control Conference (IEEE Cat. No.90CH2896-9), P795
[3]  
Balas G., 2012, AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference
[4]   Advanced probabilistic μ-analysis techniques for AOCS validation [J].
Biannic, Jean-Marc ;
Roos, Clement ;
Bennani, Samir ;
Boquet, Fabrice ;
Preda, Valentin ;
Girouart, Benedicte .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CONTROL, 2021, 62 :120-129
[5]   EXACT CALCULATION OF THE MULTILOOP STABILITY MARGIN [J].
DEGASTON, RRE ;
SAFONOV, MG .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 1988, 33 (02) :156-171
[6]   Reliable computation of the robustness margin for a flexible aircraft [J].
Ferreres, G ;
Biannic, JM .
CONTROL ENGINEERING PRACTICE, 2001, 9 (12) :1267-1278
[7]  
Ferreres G., 1999, PRACTICAL APPROACH R
[8]  
Fu M., 1998, Stability and Control of TimeDelay Systems, V1st
[9]  
Gouaisbaut F., 2006, IFAC Symposium on Robust Control Design, P453
[10]  
Gu D.-. W., 2005, ADV TK CONT SIGN PRO