Unraveling University EFL Teachers' Feedback Beliefs in Teaching English Argumentative Writing

被引:0
作者
Wei, Xing [1 ]
Zhang, Lawrence Jun [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sci & Technol Beijing, Sch Foreign Studies, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Auckland, Fac Educ & Social Work, Auckland, New Zealand
关键词
Chinese EFL teachers; teaching EFL argumentative writing; writing feedback beliefs; (sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic); (sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic); (sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic); STUDENTS; INSTRUCTION; REVISION; LITERACY; LANGUAGE;
D O I
10.1111/ijal.12646
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Teachers' beliefs about feedback can affect both the way they provide feedback and its effectiveness in improving students' writing proficiency. However, research remains scant on belief-practice relationships. This study attempted to fill the gap by investigating such relationships with a sample of 112 Chinese university EFL teachers in teaching argumentative writing. Data were collected through a writing feedback beliefs and practices questionnaire, an argumentative writing teaching beliefs questionnaire, and semi-structured interviews. The participants were selected using convenience sampling from six universities in Northern China. Quantitative data were analyzed through confirmatory factor analysis, multiple regression, and repeated measures ANOVA to examine the characteristics of these teachers' writing feedback beliefs and the relationships between the beliefs and relevant practices. Qualitative data from the interviews were analyzed thematically to gain deeper insights into the belief-practice relationships. Results indicated that most teachers believed their feedback was crucial for improving students' argumentative writing, particularly regarding communicative purposes, discourse organization, linguistic expressions, argument construction, and rhetorical techniques. However, a discrepancy was noted between teachers' feedback beliefs and their practices, especially concerning linguistic expressions. These findings highlight the need for targeted support to better align teachers' feedback beliefs with their practices for more effective teaching of EFL writing. (sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic).(sic)(sic), (sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic).(sic)(sic), (sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)112(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic), (sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic), (sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic).(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic),(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic).(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic).(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic),(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic), (sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic).(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic), (sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic).(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic), (sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic), (sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic),(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic),(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic),(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic).(sic)(sic), (sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic), (sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic).(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic), (sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic), (sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic), (sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic)(sic).
引用
收藏
页码:603 / 616
页数:14
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]   INVESTIGATING TEACHERS' WRITTEN CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK PRACTICES IN A SAUDI EFL CONTEXT: HOW DO THEY ALIGN WITH THEIR BELIEFS, INSTITUTIONAL GUIDELINES, AND STUDENTS' PREFERENCES? [J].
Alshahrani, Abdulaziz ;
Storch, Neomy .
AUSTRALIAN REVIEW OF APPLIED LINGUISTICS, 2014, 37 (02) :101-122
[2]  
Andrews R., 2019, ARGUMENTATION HIGHER
[3]   Teaching the academic argument in a university EFL environment [J].
Bacha, Nahla Nola .
JOURNAL OF ENGLISH FOR ACADEMIC PURPOSES, 2010, 9 (03) :229-241
[4]  
Bitchener J., 2012, WRITTEN CORRECTIVE F
[5]  
Borg S., 2003, Language Teaching, V36, P81, DOI [DOI 10.1017/S0261444803001903, 10.1017/S0261444803001903]
[6]  
Borg S, 2011, ROUT HANDB APPL, P215
[7]   Argumentation and Debate in Foreign Language Instruction: A Case for the Traditional Classroom Facilitating Advanced-Level Language Uptake [J].
Brown, N. Anthony .
MODERN LANGUAGE JOURNAL, 2009, 93 (04) :534-549
[8]  
Brown TA., 2015, CONFIRMATORY FACTOR
[9]  
Buehl M.M. Beck., 2015, INT HDB RES TEACHERS, P66, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203108437
[10]   Investigating Instruction for Improving Revision of Argumentative Essays [J].
Butler, Jodie A. ;
Britt, M. Anne .
WRITTEN COMMUNICATION, 2011, 28 (01) :70-96