Strategic cultivar and sowing time selection for weed management and higher redgram productivity in semi-arid Indian regions

被引:0
作者
Marimuthu, S. [1 ,2 ]
Byrareddy, Vivekananda M. [2 ]
Dhanalakshmi, A. [3 ]
Mushtaq, Shahbaz [2 ]
Surendran, U. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Tamil Nadu Agr Univ, Natl Pulses Res Ctr, Pudukkottai, India
[2] Univ Southern Queensland, Ctr Appl Climate Sci, Toowoomba, Australia
[3] Kalaingar Karunanithi Govt Arts Coll Women A, Dept Phys, Pudukkottai, India
[4] Ctr Water Resources Dev & Management CWRDM, Kunnamangalam, Kerala, India
[5] Natl Bur Soil Survey & Land Use Planning NBSS&LUP, ICAR, Nagpur, India
关键词
redgram cultivars; time of sowing; weed growth; yield; economics; CAJAN L. MILLSP; YIELD; PIGEONPEA; PERFORMANCE; GENOTYPES; GROWTH; DATE; ZONE;
D O I
10.3389/fenvs.2024.1420078
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Introduction Redgram (Cajanus cajan L. Mill sp.), a leguminous crop commonly grown in tropical and subtropical climates, is highly valued for its high protein content (21%), which contributes significantly to food and nutritional security. However, its production faces challenges primarily due to terminal dryness experienced during critical growth stages because of changing rainfall patterns. To overcome this, adaptive techniques become imperative as the productivity of this crop is intricately linked to environmental factors and the crop's growth cycle.Methods Hence, the field experiment was conducted at the National Pulses Research Centre, Vamban, Pudukkottai, Tamil Nadu, in South India under rainfed condition, during the kharif (monsoon) seasons of 2017-18 and 2018-19. The primary objectives were to determine the optimal sowing time and identify suitable redgram cultivars, especially in the context of the late onset of the monsoon in Tamil Nadu, a common issue under changing climate conditions. The experiments tested six different sowing dates with three redgram cultivars.Results and discussion The findings highlighted the substantial influence of different redgram cultivars and sowing times on the crop's growth characteristics and yield. Among the six sowing dates tested, planting in later half of June (S6) resulted in notably higher plant height (201 cm), a greater number of pods per plant (287), a seed yield of 1,112 kg ha-1, and a benefit-cost ratio of 2.61 Notably, this sowing period (S6) demonstrated comparable performance with the treatment of redgram sowing in the latter part of September (S4). CO 6 (V1) is the most productive of the three redgram cultivars, with the highest mean pant height (200 cm), number of pods per plant (237), grain yield (1,017 kg ha-1), and benefit cost ratio (2.38). Extended phenological phases along with extra days to reach phenological stages could account for the increased yield in comparison to the other cultivars. Among the two short-duration cultivars, VBN (Rg) 3 (V3) had a significantly higher mean grain yield of 958 kg ha-1 with the benefit-cost ratio of 2.24. Even though CO 6 (V1) obtained a higher yield due to its long duration nature, it matured in 187 days whereas VBN (Rg) 3 (V3) matured within 129 days. Consequently, the short-duration redgram cultivars emerge as highly suitable choices for integrating into crop sequences, thereby augmenting farm cropping intensity.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 56 条
  • [1] Al-Asadi M. S., 2019, J. Environ. Biol, V40, P821
  • [2] Anil P., 2023, Asian J. Res. Crop Sci, V8, P173, DOI [10.9734/ajrcs/2023/v8i3177, DOI 10.9734/AJRCS/2023/V8I3177]
  • [3] Aruna E., 2023, Int. J. Plant Soil Sci, V35, P1983, DOI [10.9734/ijpss/2023/v35i183483, DOI 10.9734/IJPSS/2023/V35I183483]
  • [4] Arunkumar M. M., 2018, J. Pharmacogn. Phytochemistry, V7, P266
  • [5] Channabasavanna A. S., 2015, Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Sciences, V28, P604
  • [6] Channappagoudar B. B., 2007, Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Sciences, V20, P241
  • [7] Agronomic and Environmental Determinants of Direct Seeded Rice in South Asia
    Chaudhary A.
    Venkatramanan V.
    Kumar Mishra A.
    Sharma S.
    [J]. Circular Economy and Sustainability, 2023, 3 (1): : 253 - 290
  • [8] Chawhan R. G., 2019, Pharma Innovation J, V8, P784
  • [9] Dahariya L., 2018, Int. J. Chem. Stud, V6, P2154
  • [10] Dhanoji M. M., 2011, Environment and Ecology, V29, P1003