The end of economics hegemony? studying economic ideas in a post-neoliberal world

被引:0
作者
Stahl, Rune Moller [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Copenhagen Business Sch, Dept Management Soc & Commun, Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Dalgas Have 15, DK-2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark
关键词
Post-neoliberalism; economic ideas; neoliberalism; geoeconomics; critical political economy; economic governance; POLICY PARADIGMS; POLITICS; WAR;
D O I
10.1080/09692290.2025.2467384
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Since the 1990s, a particular approach to analysing the political influence of economic ideas has emerged in International Political Economy (IPE)-often labelled 'the ideational turn'. This approach highlights the strong link between intellectual debates in the economics profession and developments in the realm of economic policy. This article re-examines this body of literature in the context of the crisis of neoliberalism and investigates how our theories of the power of economic ideas have been shaped by the neoliberal conjuncture under which they developed. The neoliberal era witnessed a broad depoliticisation of economic policy debates, a process in which economists played a crucial role. However, while major policy breaks in the twentieth century were tied to shifts in dominant economic theories, recent changes have occurred without corresponding transformations in economic thinking. Ideas once deemed heretical-such as tariffs, price controls, or industrial policy-have gained traction in policy circles, despite rejection from mainstream economics. This suggests that, unlike the neoliberal era, we are entering a period where economic policymaking is increasingly detached from academic economics. The article examines the consequences of these recent changes and discusses their impact on the study of economic ideas for IPE in a post-neoliberal world.
引用
收藏
页码:1266 / 1283
页数:18
相关论文
共 92 条
[1]   Rebirth of Industrial Policy and an Agenda for the Twenty-First Century [J].
Aiginger, Karl ;
Rodrik, Dani .
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRY COMPETITION & TRADE, 2020, 20 (02) :189-207
[2]   A partial conversion: how the 'unholy trinity' of global economic governance adapts to state capitalism [J].
Alami, Ilias ;
Taggart, Jack .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS, 2024, 30 (04) :867-893
[3]  
Althusser Louis., 2016, READING CAPITAL COMP
[4]   Populism versus Economic Expertise: J. Laurence Laughlin Debates William (Coin) Harvey [J].
Andre-Aigret, Constance ;
Dimand, Robert W. .
FORUM FOR SOCIAL ECONOMICS, 2018, 47 (02) :164-172
[5]   The Credibility Revolution in Empirical Economics: How Better Research Design is Taking the Con out of Econometrics [J].
Angrist, Joshua D. ;
Pischke, Joern-Steffen .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2010, 24 (02) :3-30
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2023, Washington Institute for Near East Policy
[7]   The Washington Consensus as transnational policy paradigm: Its origins, trajectory and likely successor [J].
Babb, Sarah .
REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2013, 20 (02) :268-297
[8]  
Babi M., 2022, POLITICAL EC GEOECON
[9]   Let's talk about the interregnum: Gramsci and the crisis of the liberal world order [J].
Babic, Milan .
INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS, 2020, 96 (03) :767-+
[10]  
Ban Cornel., 2016, RULING IDEAS GLOBAL