Road to prosperity: How urban-rural transportation integration drives rural household consumption growth

被引:1
作者
Wei, Binhui [1 ]
Zhao, Chunkai [1 ,2 ]
Luo, Mingzhong [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] South China Agr Univ, Coll Econ & Management, 483 Wushan Rd, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] South China Agr Univ, Rural Revitalizat Lab, 483 Wushan Rd, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Urban-rural transportation integration; constructions; Household consumption; Rural China; Difference-in-Differences; HIGH-SPEED RAIL; POVERTY EVIDENCE; AGGLOMERATION ECONOMIES; PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE; PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH; TRADE EVIDENCE; TIME USE; IMPACT; ACCESSIBILITY; LEISURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.habitatint.2025.103326
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Using a quasi-natural experiment of the Urban-Rural Transportation Integration Demonstration County (UTIDC) policy, we investigated the causal impact of urban-rural transportation integration (UTI) constructions on rural household consumption in China. Within a Difference-in-Differences (DID) framework, we revealed the consumption-enhancing effect of UTI constructions. Specifically, compared to rural households in non-UTIDCs, those in UTIDCs saw an average increase in annual per capita consumption of approximately 3592 yuan, representing an increase of 36.58%. The baseline DID results are supported by rigorous robustness checks, including spillover effect tests, placebo tests, and alternative specifications. We further explored the potential mechanisms both from the supply and demand sides, finding that this positive effect may be explained by the alleviation of market segmentation, income growth, and increased leisure time. Additionally, UTI constructions improve consumption structure and reduce consumption inequality in rural China, particularly benefiting some vulnerable groups. Our findings also indicate that there is a synergy between e-commerce development and UTI constructions to stimulate rural household consumption. Our study complements the research field on the welfare effect of transportation infrastructure and provides insights into how to promote rural consumption by UTI constructions in developing countries.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 131 条
[1]   The Impact of Rosenwald Schools on Black Achievement [J].
Aaronson, Daniel ;
Mazumder, Bhashkar .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2011, 119 (05) :821-888
[2]   Do rural roads create pathways out of poverty? Evidence from India [J].
Aggarwal, Shilpa .
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2018, 133 :375-395
[3]  
Aigner-Walder B, 2012, EURASIAN ECON REV, V2, P63
[4]   High speed rail and tourism: Empirical evidence from Spain [J].
Albalate, Daniel ;
Fageda, Xavier .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2016, 85 :174-185
[5]   High-Speed Rail: Lessons for Policy Makers from Experiences Abroad [J].
Albalate, Daniel ;
Bel, Germa .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2012, 72 (03) :336-349
[6]   The spatial productivity of transportation infrastructure [J].
Arbues, Pelayo ;
Banos, Jose F. ;
Mayor, Matias .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2015, 75 :166-177
[7]   Rural Roads and Local Economic Development [J].
Asher, Sam ;
Novosad, Paul .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2020, 110 (03) :797-823
[8]   Consumption Inequality [J].
Attanasio, Orazio P. ;
Pistaferri, Luigi .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2016, 30 (02) :3-28
[9]   Infrastructure and entrepreneurship [J].
Audretsch, David B. ;
Heger, Diana ;
Veith, Tobias .
SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 2015, 44 (02) :219-230
[10]   Infrastructure development in China: The cases of electricity, highways, and railways [J].
Bai, Chong-En ;
Qian, Yingyi .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE ECONOMICS, 2010, 38 (01) :34-51