Human-centred AI for emergency cardiac care: Evaluating RAPIDx AI with PROLIFERATE_AI

被引:0
作者
Plaza, Maria Alejandra Pinero de [1 ]
Lambrakis, Kristina [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Marmolejo-Ramos, Fernando [1 ]
Beleigoli, Alline [1 ]
Archibald, Mandy [1 ]
Yadav, Lalit [1 ]
Mcmillan, Penelope [5 ]
Clark, Robyn [1 ]
Lawless, Michael [1 ]
Morton, Erin [8 ]
Hendriks, Jeroen [7 ]
Kitson, Alison [1 ]
Visvanathan, Renuka [6 ]
Chew, Derek P. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Causil, Carlos Javier Barrera [9 ]
机构
[1] Flinders Univ S Australia, Caring Futures Inst, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Victorian Heart Inst, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Monash Hlth, MonashHeart, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Flinders Univ S Australia, Coll Med & Publ Hlth, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[5] South Australian Hlth & Med Res Inst SAHMRI, Myalg Encephalomyelitis Chron Fatigue Syndrome ME, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[6] Univ Adelaide, Fac Hlth & Med Sci, Adelaide Med Sch, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[7] Maastricht Univ, Dept Nursing, Med Ctr, Maastricht, Netherlands
[8] Bespoke Clin Res, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[9] Inst Tecnol Metropolitano, Medellin, Colombia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Emergency medicine; Decision support; Cardiac biomarkers; Usability; Adoption; Human-centred evaluation; STRUCTURED EXPERT ELICITATION; KNOWLEDGE ELICITATION; DECISION-MAKING;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2025.105810
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Background: Chest pain diagnosis in emergency care is hindered by overlapping cardiac and non-cardiac symptoms, causing diagnostic uncertainty. Artificial Intelligence, such as RAPIDx AI, aims to enhance accuracy through clinical and biochemical data integration, but its adoption relies on addressing usability, explainability, and seamless workflow integration without disrupting care. Objective: Evaluate RAPIDx AI's integration into clinical workflows, address usability barriers, and optimise its adoption in emergencies. Methods: The PROLIFERATE_AI framework was implemented across 12 EDs (July 2022-January 2024) with 39 participants: 15 experts co-designed a survey via Expert Knowledge Elicitation (EKE), applied to 24 ED clinicians to assess RAPIDx AI usability and adoption. Bayesian inference, using priors, estimated comprehension, emotional engagement, usage, and preference, while Monte Carlo simulations quantified uncertainty and variability, generating posterior means and 95% bootstrapped confidence intervals. Qualitative thematic analysis identified barriers and optimisation needs, with data triangulated through the PROLIFERATE_AI scoring system to rate RAPIDx AI's performance by user roles and demographics. Results: Registrars exhibited the highest comprehension (median: 0.466, 95 % CI: 0.41-0.51) and preference (median: 0.458, 95 % CI: 0.41-0.48), while residents/interns scored the lowest in comprehension (median: 0.198, 95 % CI: 0.17-0.26) and emotional engagement (median: 0.112, 95 % CI: 0.09-0.14). Registered nurses showed strong emotional engagement (median: 0.379, 95 % CI: 0.35-0.45). Novice users faced usability and workflow integration barriers, while experienced clinicians suggested automation and streamlined workflows. RAPIDx AI scored "Good Impact," excelling with trained users but requiring targeted refinements for novices. Conclusion: RAPIDx AI enhances diagnostic accuracy and efficiency for experienced users, but usability challenges for novices highlight the need for targeted training and interface refinements. The PROLIFERATE_AI framework offers a robust methodology for evaluating and scaling AI solutions, addressing the evolving needs of sociotechnical systems.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [21] Artificial Creativity? Evaluating AI Against Human Performance in Creative Interpretation of Visual Stimuli
    Grassini, Simone
    Koivisto, Mika
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION, 2025, 41 (07) : 4037 - 4048
  • [22] Artificial Intelligence Chatbots and Emergency Medical Services: Perspectives on the Implications of Generative AI in Prehospital Care
    Ventura, Christian Angelo, I
    Denton, Edward E.
    OPEN ACCESS EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2023, 15 : 289 - 292
  • [23] Evaluating a Novel AI Tool for Automated Measurement of the Aortic Root and Valve in Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Parker, Jack
    Coey, James
    Alambrouk, Tarek
    Lakey, Samuel M.
    Green, Thomas
    Brown, Alexander
    Maxwell, Ian
    Ripley, David P.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (05)
  • [24] Real-time AI prediction for major adverse cardiac events in emergency department patients with chest pain
    Zhang, Pei-, I
    Hsu, Chien-Chin
    Kao, Yuan
    Chen, Chia-Jung
    Kuo, Ya-Wei
    Hsu, Shu-Lien
    Liu, Tzu-Lan
    Lin, Hung-Jung
    Wang, Jhi-Joung
    Liu, Chung-Feng
    Huang, Chien-Cheng
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF TRAUMA RESUSCITATION & EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2020, 28 (01)
  • [25] Real-time AI prediction for major adverse cardiac events in emergency department patients with chest pain
    Pei-I Zhang
    Chien-Chin Hsu
    Yuan Kao
    Chia-Jung Chen
    Ya-Wei Kuo
    Shu-Lien Hsu
    Tzu-Lan Liu
    Hung-Jung Lin
    Jhi-Joung Wang
    Chung-Feng Liu
    Chien-Cheng Huang
    Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, 28
  • [26] On Assessing Trustworthy AI in Healthcare. Machine Learning as a Supportive Tool to Recognize Cardiac Arrest in Emergency Calls
    Zicari, Roberto V.
    Brusseau, James
    Blomberg, Stig Nikolaj
    Christensen, Helle Collatz
    Coffee, Megan
    Ganapini, Marianna B.
    Gerke, Sara
    Gilbert, Thomas Krendl
    Hickman, Eleanore
    Hildt, Elisabeth
    Holm, Sune
    Kuehne, Ulrich
    Madai, Vince I.
    Osika, Walter
    Spezzatti, Andy
    Schnebel, Eberhard
    Tithi, Jesmin Jahan
    Vetter, Dennis
    Westerlund, Magnus
    Wurth, Renee
    Amann, Julia
    Antun, Vegard
    Beretta, Valentina
    Bruneault, Frederick
    Campano, Erik
    Dudder, Boris
    Gallucci, Alessio
    Goffi, Emmanuel
    Haase, Christoffer Bjerre
    Hagendorff, Thilo
    Kringen, Pedro
    Moeslein, Florian
    Ottenheimer, Davi
    Ozols, Matiss
    Palazzani, Laura
    Petrin, Martin
    Tafur, Karin
    Torresen, Jim
    Volland, Holger
    Kararigas, Georgios
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN DYNAMICS, 2021, 3
  • [27] Chatbots Vs. Human Experts: Evaluating Diagnostic Performance of Chatbots in Uveitis and the Perspectives on AI Adoption in Ophthalmology
    Rojas-Carabali, William
    Sen, Alok
    Agarwal, Aniruddha
    Tan, Gavin
    Cheung, Carol Y.
    Rousselot, Andres
    Agrawal, Rajdeep
    Liu, Renee
    Cifuentes-Gonzalez, Carlos
    Elze, Tobias
    Kempen, John H.
    Sobrin, Lucia
    Nguyen, Quan Dong
    de-la-Torre, Alejandra
    Lee, Bernett
    Gupta, Vishali
    Agrawal, Rupesh
    OCULAR IMMUNOLOGY AND INFLAMMATION, 2024, 32 (08) : 1591 - 1598
  • [28] Evaluating risk in perishable-food manufacturing and logistics services from the view of human-AI synergy
    Zhan, Sha-lei
    Jiang, Xiangdong
    Ng, Chi To
    Lun, Venus Y. H.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2025,
  • [29] Nonradiology Health Care Professionals Significantly Benefit From AI Assistance in Emergency-Related Chest Radiography Interpretation
    Rudolph, Jan
    Huemmer, Christian
    Preuhs, Alexander
    Buizza, Giulia
    Hoppe, Boj F.
    Dinkel, Julien
    Koliogiannis, Vanessa
    Fink, Nicola
    Goller, Sophia S.
    Schwarze, Vincent
    Mansour, Nabeel
    Schmidt, Vanessa F.
    Fischer, Maximilian
    Joergens, Maximilian
    Ben Khaled, Najib
    Liebig, Thomas
    Ricke, Jens
    Rueckel, Johannes
    Sabel, Bastian O.
    CHEST, 2024, 166 (01) : 157 - 170
  • [30] Evaluating LLM-based generative AI tools in emergency triage: A comparative study of ChatGPT Plus, Copilot Pro, and triage nurses
    Arslan, B.
    Nuhoglu, C.
    Satici, M. O.
    Altinbilek, E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2025, 89 : 174 - 181