Human-centred AI for emergency cardiac care: Evaluating RAPIDx AI with PROLIFERATE_AI

被引:0
作者
Plaza, Maria Alejandra Pinero de [1 ]
Lambrakis, Kristina [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Marmolejo-Ramos, Fernando [1 ]
Beleigoli, Alline [1 ]
Archibald, Mandy [1 ]
Yadav, Lalit [1 ]
Mcmillan, Penelope [5 ]
Clark, Robyn [1 ]
Lawless, Michael [1 ]
Morton, Erin [8 ]
Hendriks, Jeroen [7 ]
Kitson, Alison [1 ]
Visvanathan, Renuka [6 ]
Chew, Derek P. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Causil, Carlos Javier Barrera [9 ]
机构
[1] Flinders Univ S Australia, Caring Futures Inst, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Victorian Heart Inst, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Monash Hlth, MonashHeart, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Flinders Univ S Australia, Coll Med & Publ Hlth, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[5] South Australian Hlth & Med Res Inst SAHMRI, Myalg Encephalomyelitis Chron Fatigue Syndrome ME, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[6] Univ Adelaide, Fac Hlth & Med Sci, Adelaide Med Sch, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[7] Maastricht Univ, Dept Nursing, Med Ctr, Maastricht, Netherlands
[8] Bespoke Clin Res, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[9] Inst Tecnol Metropolitano, Medellin, Colombia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Emergency medicine; Decision support; Cardiac biomarkers; Usability; Adoption; Human-centred evaluation; STRUCTURED EXPERT ELICITATION; KNOWLEDGE ELICITATION; DECISION-MAKING;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2025.105810
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Background: Chest pain diagnosis in emergency care is hindered by overlapping cardiac and non-cardiac symptoms, causing diagnostic uncertainty. Artificial Intelligence, such as RAPIDx AI, aims to enhance accuracy through clinical and biochemical data integration, but its adoption relies on addressing usability, explainability, and seamless workflow integration without disrupting care. Objective: Evaluate RAPIDx AI's integration into clinical workflows, address usability barriers, and optimise its adoption in emergencies. Methods: The PROLIFERATE_AI framework was implemented across 12 EDs (July 2022-January 2024) with 39 participants: 15 experts co-designed a survey via Expert Knowledge Elicitation (EKE), applied to 24 ED clinicians to assess RAPIDx AI usability and adoption. Bayesian inference, using priors, estimated comprehension, emotional engagement, usage, and preference, while Monte Carlo simulations quantified uncertainty and variability, generating posterior means and 95% bootstrapped confidence intervals. Qualitative thematic analysis identified barriers and optimisation needs, with data triangulated through the PROLIFERATE_AI scoring system to rate RAPIDx AI's performance by user roles and demographics. Results: Registrars exhibited the highest comprehension (median: 0.466, 95 % CI: 0.41-0.51) and preference (median: 0.458, 95 % CI: 0.41-0.48), while residents/interns scored the lowest in comprehension (median: 0.198, 95 % CI: 0.17-0.26) and emotional engagement (median: 0.112, 95 % CI: 0.09-0.14). Registered nurses showed strong emotional engagement (median: 0.379, 95 % CI: 0.35-0.45). Novice users faced usability and workflow integration barriers, while experienced clinicians suggested automation and streamlined workflows. RAPIDx AI scored "Good Impact," excelling with trained users but requiring targeted refinements for novices. Conclusion: RAPIDx AI enhances diagnostic accuracy and efficiency for experienced users, but usability challenges for novices highlight the need for targeted training and interface refinements. The PROLIFERATE_AI framework offers a robust methodology for evaluating and scaling AI solutions, addressing the evolving needs of sociotechnical systems.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] Human-centred AI vs machine-centred AI: navigating AI ethical crises in luxury retail
    Li, Jiarui
    Kang, Jiyun
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RETAIL & DISTRIBUTION MANAGEMENT, 2025,
  • [2] Towards human-centred standards for legal help AI
    Hagan, Margaret
    PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 2024, 382 (2270):
  • [3] Towards a Comprehensive Human-Centred Evaluation Framework for Explainable AI
    Donoso-Guzman, Ivania
    Ooge, Jeroen
    Parra, Denis
    Verbert, Katrien
    EXPLAINABLE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, XAI 2023, PT III, 2023, 1903 : 183 - 204
  • [4] Practical Aspects of Designing a Human-centred AI System in Manufacturing
    Yamamoto, Yuji
    Munoz, Alvaro Aranda
    Sandstrom, Kristian
    5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRY 4.0 AND SMART MANUFACTURING, ISM 2023, 2024, 232 : 2626 - 2638
  • [5] Promoting human-centred AI in the workplace. Trade unions and their strategies for regulating the use of AI in Germany
    Krzywdzinski, Martin
    Gerst, Detlef
    Butollo, Florian
    TRANSFER-EUROPEAN REVIEW OF LABOUR AND RESEARCH, 2023, 29 (01) : 53 - 70
  • [6] We're only human after all: a critique of human-centred AI
    Ryan, Mark
    AI & SOCIETY, 2024, : 1303 - 1319
  • [7] THE CRISIS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: A NEW DIGITAL HUMANITIES CURRICULUM FOR HUMAN-CENTRED AI
    Chun, Jon
    Elkins, Katherine
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES AND ARTS COMPUTING-A JOURNAL OF DIGITAL HUMANITIES, 2023, 17 (02): : 147 - 167
  • [8] Introduction to the Special Issue on Human-Centred AI in Healthcare: Challenges Appearing in the Wild
    Andersen, Tariq Osman
    Nunes, Francisco
    Wilcox, Lauren
    Coiera, Enrico
    Rogers, Yvonne
    ACM TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTER-HUMAN INTERACTION, 2023, 30 (02)
  • [9] Understanding Human-Centred AI: a review of its defining elements and a research agenda
    Schmager, Stefan
    Pappas, Ilias O.
    Vassilakopoulou, Polyxeni
    BEHAVIOUR & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2025,
  • [10] Hack Beyond the Code: Building a Toolbox of Human-Centred Strategies for AI Literacy
    Schulten, Cleo
    Yuan, Li
    Gama, Kiev
    Holmes, Wayne
    Nolte, Alexander
    Hoel, Tore
    Chounta, Irene-Angelica
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN EDUCATION: POSTERS AND LATE BREAKING RESULTS, WORKSHOPS AND TUTORIALS, INDUSTRY AND INNOVATION TRACKS, PRACTITIONERS, DOCTORAL CONSORTIUM AND BLUE SKY, AIED 2024, 2024, 2151 : 467 - 472