Multi-granularity onboard decision method for optical space surveillance satellite

被引:0
作者
Sun, Y. J. [1 ,2 ]
Dong, Y. F. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Beihang Univ, Sch Astronaut, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Minist Educ, Key Lab Spacecraft Design Optimizat & Dynam Simula, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
space targets observation; multi-granularity; decision-making; sequential three-way decisions; 3-WAY DECISION; OPTIMIZATION; COMMAND;
D O I
10.1017/aer.2024.107
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Critical space assets require continuous monitoring to prevent potential losses. Auxiliary satellites protect these assets by observing and tracking approaching targets. Although observation satellites can make rapid autonomous onboard decisions, they face challenges due to limited computational capacity. The two mainstream command and control methods currently available do not meet the demands of onboard decision-making. Highly procedural decision-making methods require extended decision times, while rapid-response intuitive or heuristic methods carry significant error risks. To address this, this paper proposes a multi-granularity decision-making method for optical space surveillance satellites. First, multi-granularity relative orbit determination algorithm models and multi-granularity impulsive orbit manoeuver algorithm models were developed. Based on these models, a granularity selection method for sequential three-way decisions is proposed. In non-emergency situations, fine-granularity models are preferred to conserve fuel, while in emergency situations, coarse-granularity models are used to enhance decision-making speed and reduce positional deviations caused by the manoeuvering game. In random multi- scenario tests, the proposed method demonstrates lower average terminal positional deviations and fuel consumption compared to single-granularity (highly procedural or rapid-response) and random-granularity methods.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Rethinking OODA: Toward a modern cognitive framework of command decision making
    Bryant, David J.
    [J]. MILITARY PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 18 (03) : 183 - 206
  • [2] TERMINAL GUIDANCE SYSTEM FOR SATELLITE RENDEZVOUS
    CLOHESSY, WH
    WILTSHIRE, RS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AEROSPACE SCIENCES, 1960, 27 (09): : 653 - &
  • [3] Applying the concept of patterns to systems architecture
    Cloutier, Robert J.
    Verma, Dinesh
    [J]. SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2007, 10 (02) : 138 - 154
  • [4] Feasibility of performing space surveillance tasks with a proposed space-based optical architecture
    Flohrer, T.
    Krag, H.
    Klinkrad, H.
    Schildknecht, T.
    [J]. ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH, 2011, 47 (06) : 1029 - 1042
  • [5] Onboard Processing With Hybrid and Reconfigurable Computing on Small Satellites
    George, Alan D.
    Wilson, Christopher M.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE, 2018, 106 (03) : 458 - 470
  • [6] Kun T., 2023, Contemporary Military Challenges, V25, P73, DOI [10.2478/cmc-2023-0006, DOI 10.2478/CMC-2023-0006]
  • [7] Particle swarm optimization (PSO). A tutorial
    Marini, Federico
    Walczak, Beata
    [J]. CHEMOMETRICS AND INTELLIGENT LABORATORY SYSTEMS, 2015, 149 : 153 - 165
  • [8] Sequential three-way decisions via multi-granularity
    Qian, Jin
    Liu, Caihui
    Miao, Duoqian
    Yue, Xiaodong
    [J]. INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2020, 507 : 606 - 629
  • [9] Raymond J.W., 2020, Space Capstone Publication, Spacepower (SCP) Headquarters United States Space Force June 2020 Dedicated to Past, Present, and Future Spacepower Pioneers
  • [10] STMicroelectronics, 2020, High-Performance Foundation Line, Arm Cortex-M4 Core with DSP and FPU, 1 Mbyte of Flash Memory, 168 MHz CPU, ART Accelerator, FSMC, HW Crypto