Application of Statistical Model Checking for Robustness Comparison of Power Electronics Controllers

被引:0
|
作者
Novak, Matej A. [1 ]
Grobelna, Iwona [2 ]
Nyman, Ulrik [3 ]
Blaabjerg, Frede [1 ]
机构
[1] Aalborg Univ, AAU Energy, Aalborg, Denmark
[2] Univ Zielona Gora, Autom Control Elect & Electr Engn, Zielona Gora, Poland
[3] Aalborg Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Aalborg, Denmark
来源
IEEE 15TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON POWER ELECTRONICS FOR DISTRIBUTED GENERATION SYSTEMS, PEDG 2024 | 2024年
关键词
Controller; hybrid automata; model predictive control; modelling; neural networks; power electronics; robustness; statistical model checking; PREDICTIVE CONTROL; LATEST ADVANCES; CONVERTERS;
D O I
10.1109/PEDG61800.2024.10667463
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Power electronic-based systems exhibit non-linear dynamics requiring simultaneous control of multiple control objectives. It is therefore expected that controllers that can cope with those nonlinearities will have a better performance than controllers requiring system linearization or nesting of the control objectives in a cascaded structure. However, the problem remains how to quantify their robustness and make a fair comparison between different non-linear controllers. The conventional tools used for the robustness validation of linear controllers cannot directly be applied to different non-linear controllers. Therefore, this paper demonstrates an approach based on statistical model checking for performing controller comparisons. The performance and robustness of different controllers (linear, model predictive, and neural networks-based) were compared in the same stochastic environment. Using this approach, a statistical estimate can be obtained for how the controller performance will be affected under different scenarios.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Statistical Model Checking of Dynamic Software Architectures
    Cavalcante, Everton
    Quilbeuf, Jean
    Traonouez, Louis-Marie
    Oquendo, Flavio
    Batista, Thais
    Legay, Axel
    SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURE, ECSA 2016, 2016, 9839 : 185 - 200
  • [32] Comprehensive evaluation of file systems robustness with SPIN model checking
    Yuan, Jingcheng
    Aoki, Toshiaki
    Guo, Xiaoyun
    SOFTWARE TESTING VERIFICATION & RELIABILITY, 2022, 32 (06)
  • [33] Statistical model checking for unbounded until formulas
    Nima Roohi
    Mahesh Viswanathan
    International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer, 2015, 17 : 417 - 427
  • [34] Statistical model checking of Timed Rebeca models
    Jafari, Ali
    Khamespanah, Ehsan
    Kristinsson, Haukur
    Sirjani, Marjan
    Magnusson, Brynjar
    COMPUTER LANGUAGES SYSTEMS & STRUCTURES, 2016, 45 : 53 - 79
  • [35] An approach for the robustness comparison between piecewise linear PID -like fuzzy and classical PID controllers
    C. W. Tao
    J. S. Taur
    Soft Computing, 2005, 9 : 430 - 438
  • [36] Comparative Analysis of Statistical Model Checking Tools
    Bakir, Mehmet Emin
    Gheorghe, Marian
    Konur, Savas
    Stannett, Mike
    MEMBRANE COMPUTING (CMC 2016), 2017, 10105 : 119 - 135
  • [37] Comparison of Impedance Model and Amplitude-Phase Model for Power- Electronics-Based Power System
    Yang, Ziqian
    Mei, Cong
    Cheng, Shijie
    Zhan, Meng
    IEEE JOURNAL OF EMERGING AND SELECTED TOPICS IN POWER ELECTRONICS, 2020, 8 (03) : 2546 - 2558
  • [38] Recent Challenge and Trends of Predictive Control in Power Electronics Application
    Hosseinzadeh, M. Ali
    Sarbanzadeh, M.
    Sarbanzadeh, E.
    Rivera, M.
    Gregor, R.
    2018 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS FOR AIRCRAFT, RAILWAY, SHIP PROPULSION AND ROAD VEHICLES & INTERNATIONAL TRANSPORTATION ELECTRIFICATION CONFERENCE (ESARS-ITEC), 2018,
  • [39] Statistical Model Checking of Cyber-Physical Systems Using Hybrid Theatre
    Nigro, Libero
    Sciammarella, Paolo F.
    INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS, VOL 1, 2020, 1037 : 1232 - 1251
  • [40] Utility of Statistical Model Checking of Stochastic Hybrid Automata for Patient Controlled Analgesia
    Pranevicius, Henrikas
    Naujokaitis, Darius
    Pilkauskas, Vytautas
    Pranevicius, Osvaldas
    Pranevicius, Mindaugas
    ELEKTRONIKA IR ELEKTROTECHNIKA, 2017, 23 (06) : 10 - 18