Evaluation of joint external evaluation to COVID-19 and other infectious diseases mortality outcomes in 96 countries

被引:0
作者
Lee, Yuri [1 ]
Kim, Siwoo [2 ]
Lee, Sieun [1 ]
Kim, Min Kyung [3 ]
Gostin, Lawrence O. [4 ]
Oh, Juhwan [5 ]
机构
[1] Myongji Coll, Dept Hlth & Med Informat, Seoul 03656, South Korea
[2] Korea Dis Control & Prevent Agcy, Div Dis Surveillance Strategy, 187 Osongsaengmyeong2 Ro, Cheongju 28159, Chungcheongbuk, South Korea
[3] Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, Carolina Populat Ctr, Gillings Sch Global Publ Hlth, 135 Dauer Dr, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[4] Georgetown Univ, Law Ctr, ONeill Inst Natl & Global Hlth Law, 600 New Jersey Ave, Washington, DC 20001 USA
[5] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Med, 103 Daehak Ro, Seoul 03087, South Korea
来源
INTERNATIONAL HEALTH | 2024年
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
COVID-19; infectious diseases; Joint External Evaluation;
D O I
10.1093/inthealth/ihae077
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background This study evaluated the effectiveness of Joint External Evaluation (JEE) scores with regard to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and other infectious diseases performance in 96 countries. To propose a revised JEE tool, potential JEE indicators were also examined.Methods JEE data from 2016-2019 were linked with outcomes such as COVID-19 fatality rates and infections, as well as mortality rates for other infectious diseases. We also examined potential indicators such as the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and Universal Health Coverage index to propose enhancements to the JEE tool. Multiple regression analysis was used to assess these associations.Results The average JEE score was 2.70 (SD=0.92) in 96 countries. Detection capabilities received the highest average score (3.23), while the other areas (2.30) section received the lowest scores. However, the analysis revealed that the JEE tool had limited predictive accuracy for COVID-19 outcomes. By contrast, the JEE scores showed a negative association with the performance of other infectious diseases. Notably, SDGs 2 (zero hunger), 4 (quality education) and 8 (decent work and economic growth) were strongly associated with better COVID-19 outcomes.Conclusion The JEE scores showed limited predictive value for COVID-19 mortality outcomes in 96 countries. The tool offers insights into health security, but needs revision to better handle future pandemics.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] The Global Health Security Index is not predictive of coronavirus pandemic responses among Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development countries
    Abbey, Enoch J.
    Khalifa, Banda A. A.
    Oduwole, Modupe O.
    Ayeh, Samuel K.
    Nudotor, Richard D.
    Salia, Emmanuella L.
    Lasisi, Oluwatobi
    Bennett, Seth
    Yusuf, Hasiya E.
    Agwu, Allison L.
    Karakousis, Petros C.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (10):
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2012, Wkly Epidemiol Rec, V87, P461
  • [3] [Anonymous], WORLDOMETER COVID 19
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2022, World Bank Open Data
  • [5] [Anonymous], WORLD FACTBOOK
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2005, Joint external evaluation tool: International Health Regulations
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2012, World Health Statistics
  • [8] THE FAILURE OF 'CORE CAPACITIES' UNDER THE WHO INTERNATIONAL HEALTH REGULATIONS
    Bartolini, Giulio
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL & COMPARATIVE LAW QUARTERLY, 2021, 70 (01) : 233 - 250
  • [9] Explaining covid-19 performance: what factors might predict national responses?
    Baum, Fran
    Freeman, Toby
    Musolino, Connie
    Abramovitz, Mimi
    De Ceukelaire, Wim
    Flavel, Joanne
    Friel, Sharon
    Giugliani, Camila
    Howden-Chapman, Philippa
    Nguyen Thanh Huong
    London, Leslie
    Mckee, Martin
    Popay, Jennie
    Serag, Hani
    Villar, Eugenio
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 372
  • [10] Coronavirus Pandemic (COVID-19), 2020, Our world in data