Recommendations for Psychosocial Support for Long-Distance Caregivers of Terminally Ill Patients

被引:0
作者
Herbst, Franziska A. [1 ]
Schneider, Nils [1 ]
Stiel, Stephanie [1 ]
机构
[1] Hannover Med Sch, Inst Gen Practice & Palliat Care, Carl Neuberg Str 1, D-30625 Hannover, Germany
关键词
Delphi technique; family caregivers; palliative care; end-of-life care; long-distance caregiving; consensus; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; PALLIATIVE CARE; INFORMAL CAREGIVERS; CANCER-PATIENTS; DELPHI; END; NEEDS; INTERVENTIONS; CONSENSUS; PEOPLE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.10.020
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Context. The provision of appropriate psychosocial support has a significant impact on quality of life for informal caregivers of terminally ill patients. Long-distance caregivers have specific wishes and needs for psychosocial support. Objectives. To date, no formal support measures for long-distance caregivers of terminally ill patients have been developed in Germany. The national Delphi study aimed at systematically and empirically generating recommendations for psychosocial support measures, tailored to this population. Methods. Recommendations were formulated on the basis of qualitative interviews exploring the support experiences and unmet needs of long-distance caregivers of terminally ill patients. Experts from hospice and palliative care rated the relevance and feasibility of 10 recommendations using two 4-point Likert-type scales. Additionally, suggestions for improvement were captured via free text fi elds. Recommendations were deemed to have achieved consensus when >= 80% of participants indicated " strongly agree" or " somewhat agree" for both relevance and feasibility. Results. A total of 26 experts completed two Delphi rounds. Following the fi rst round, eight of the 10 recommendations were revised according to participant feedback. After the second round, consensus was achieved for fi ve of these revised recommendations. Three recommendations were rejected, as participants regarded them unfeasible due to a perceived lack of personnel resources. Conclusion. The consensus-based recommendations represent the fi rst empirically grounded guidelines in Germany aimed at addressing the psychosocial needs of long-distance caregivers of terminally ill patients. The recommendations seek to raise awareness among both professional and voluntary workers regarding the specific support requirements of this understudied population. J Pain Symptom Manage 2025;69:10-22. (c) 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-ncnd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 65 条
[2]  
[Anonymous], Supportive and palliative care services for adults with
[3]  
[Anonymous], On the ethics of big data, see, Wenhong Chen and Anabel Quan-Haase, "Big Data Ethics and Politics: Toward New Understandings," Social Science Computer Review, November 14, 2018
[4]  
James Popham, Jennifer Lavoie, and Nicole Coomber, "Constructing a Public Narrative of Regulations for Big Data and Analytics: Results from a Community-Driven Discussion," Social Science Computer Review, August 28, 2018. Literature that addresses ethical issues in new uses of health data, with particular attention to the re-use of EHR data, alternative approaches to patient data governance, and novel models of negotiating and ensuring patient control over their data includes: Nancy E. Kass and
[5]  
Lisa M. Lee, "Ethics and Subsequent Use of Electronic Health Record Data," Journal of Biomedical Informatics 71 (July 2017): 143-46
[6]  
Adam Tanner, Our Bodies, Our Data: How Companies Make Billions Selling Our Medical Records (Boston: Beacon Press, 2016)
[7]  
Adam Tanner, "Patient Consent and the Commercialization of Lab Data," Clinical Chemistry 63, no. 2 (February 2017): 475-76
[8]  
Corey M. Angst, "Protect My Privacy or Support the Common-Good? Ethical Questions About Electronic Health Information Exchanges," Journal of Business Ethics 90, no. S2 (November 2009): 169-78
[9]  
Mhairi Aitken et al., "Public Responses to the Sharing and Linkage of Health Data for Research Purposes: A Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis of Qualitative Studies," BMC Medical Ethics 17, no. 1 (December 2016)
[10]  
Trisha Greenhalgh et al., "Tensions and Paradoxes in Electronic Patient Record Research: A Systematic Literature Review Using the Meta-Narrative Method: Electronic Patient Record Research," Milbank Quarterly 87, no. 4 (December 2009): 729-88