Nasal Deformity Correction in Cleft Lip and Palate Patients by Secondary Rhinoplasty: Patients Satisfactions

被引:0
作者
Ghanim, Khalid [1 ]
Alsabee, Waleed M. B. [2 ]
Al-Rawee, Rawaa Y. [3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ,8 ]
Tawfeeq, Bashar Abdul-Ghani [9 ]
机构
[1] Al Salam Teaching Hosp, ENT Iraqi Board, Mosul, Iraq
[2] Iraqi Board, Mosul, Iraq
[3] Al Salam Teaching Hosp, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Mosul 41003, Iraq
[4] Minist Hlth, Baghdad, Iraq
[5] RCPS Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland
[6] Al Noor Univ Coll, BAMOS, Mosul, Iraq
[7] Al Noor Univ Coll, ACPA, Mosul, Iraq
[8] Al Noor Univ Coll, IUU, AADI, Mosul, Iraq
[9] Al Noor Univ Coll, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Mosul, Iraq
关键词
Nasal deformities; secondary rhinoplasty; cleft lip and palate surgeries; quality of life; patient satisfaction; rhinoplasty outcomes evaluation;
D O I
10.1097/SCS.0000000000010476
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Aim of the Study:To evaluate the degree of patient satisfaction postsecondary rhinoplasty, specifically in cleft patients in Mosul city.Methodology:A retrospective comparison questionnaire study was conducted between March and April 2024 among cleft patients who underwent surgical secondary rhinoplasty in Mosul City of Nineveh Province. All cleft patients aged 18 to 40 who underwent secondary rhinoplasty are included in the study. Forty participants respond to a specific questionnaire in 3 time periods (before surgery 3 and 6 months after). Basic demographic information (age, gender, cause of visit, diagnosis, and treatment) is recorded. Questionnaire which conflict the patient's perception presurgery and postsurgery also. The improvement rate and reduction rate of improvement are calculated according to a special equation.Thanks for such comment. The sentences changed as requested with (Six standard questions applied to evaluate the patients' satisfaction postsurgery. Responses are assessed statistically by special equation to detect the improvement rate).Methodology:A retrospective comparison questionnaire study was conducted between March and April 2024 among cleft patients who underwent surgical secondary rhinoplasty in Mosul City of Nineveh Province. All cleft patients aged 18 to 40 who underwent secondary rhinoplasty are included in the study. Forty participants respond to a specific questionnaire in 3 time periods (before surgery 3 and 6 months after). Basic demographic information (age, gender, cause of visit, diagnosis, and treatment) is recorded. Questionnaire which conflict the patient's perception presurgery and postsurgery also. The improvement rate and reduction rate of improvement are calculated according to a special equation.Thanks for such comment. The sentences changed as requested with (Six standard questions applied to evaluate the patients' satisfaction postsurgery. Responses are assessed statistically by special equation to detect the improvement rate).Results:According to age groups, the age between 26 and 30 years have the highest incidence between the cases with 37.5%. Females are highest with (55%). Esthetics are the most common cause. Effective or improvement rate shows positive except for question 6 ( median: 4%). The reduction rate shows positive results.Conclusions:Despite being a complicated surgical operation, cleft rhinoplasty can yield symmetry, improved esthetics, and enhanced functioning, including improved breathing, which can be life-changing for patients and fulfilling for the surgeon. Its difficulty stems from the fact that it has required several surgical phases throughout the years, each of which calls for a comprehensive surgical team with a variety of specializations to be addressed for optimal outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:2300 / 2304
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Secondary rhinoplasty for patients with cleft lip and palate
    Pausch, N. C.
    Halama, Dirk
    MKG-CHIRURG, 2018, 11 (04): : 250 - 258
  • [2] Evaluation of the outcome of secondary rhinoplasty in cleft lip and palate patients
    Chaithanyaa, N.
    Rai, K. K.
    Shivakumar, H. R.
    Upasi, Amarnath
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2011, 64 (01) : 27 - 33
  • [3] Satisfaction survey of secondary rhinoplasty among unilateral cleft lip and palate patients
    Assouline-Vitale, S. L.
    Ruffenach, L.
    Bodin, F.
    Zink, S.
    Romary, Benjamin
    Bruant-Rodier, C.
    Dissaux, C.
    ANNALES DE CHIRURGIE PLASTIQUE ESTHETIQUE, 2023, 68 (02): : 139 - 144
  • [4] Secondary correction of nasal deformities in cleft lip and palate patients: surgical technique and outcome evaluation
    Vass, Gabor
    Mohos, Gabor
    Bere, Zsofia
    Ivan, Laszlo
    Varga, Janos
    Piffko, Jozsef
    Rovo, Laszlo
    HEAD & FACE MEDICINE, 2016, 12
  • [5] Secondary correction of nasal deformities in cleft lip and palate patients: surgical technique and outcome evaluation
    Gabor Vass
    Gabor Mohos
    Zsofia Bere
    Laszlo Ivan
    Janos Varga
    Jozsef Piffko
    Laszlo Rovo
    Head & Face Medicine, 12
  • [6] Patient-Reported Esthetic Outcomes Following Secondary Rhinoplasty in Adult Patients with a Cleft lip and Palate
    Homsy, Pauliina
    Grann, Annemari
    Lassus, Patrik
    CLEFT PALATE CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL, 2024,
  • [7] Use of Septal Cartilage in Rhinoplasty to Correct Nasal Deformity After Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Surgery
    Hong Loi Nguyen
    Minh Phuong Hoang
    Van Minh Nguyen
    Tan Tai Tran
    Van Son Le
    CLINICAL COSMETIC AND INVESTIGATIONAL DENTISTRY, 2022, 14 : 131 - 140
  • [8] Results of a Prospective Anthropometric and Functional Study About Aesthetics and Nasal Respiration After Secondary Rhinoplasty in Cleft Lip and Palate Patients
    Huempfner-Hierl, Heike
    Hemprich, Alexander
    Hierl, Thomas
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2009, 20 : 1863 - 1875
  • [9] Rhinoplasty for Patients with Cleft Lip-Palate Functional and Aesthetic Concerns
    Hsieh, Tsung-yen
    Gengler, Isabelle
    Tollefson, Travis T.
    OTOLARYNGOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2025, 58 (02) : 361 - 377
  • [10] Rhinoplasty for the Cleft Lip and Palate Patient
    Cuzalina, Angelo
    Jung, Calvin
    ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2016, 28 (02) : 189 - +