Extension of an ICU-based noninvasive model to predict latent shock in the emergency department: an exploratory study

被引:0
作者
Wu, Mingzheng [1 ]
Li, Shaoping [1 ]
Yu, Haibo [1 ]
Jiang, Cheng [1 ]
Dai, Shuai [1 ]
Jiang, Shan [1 ]
Zhao, Yan [1 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Univ, Emergency Ctr, Hubei Clin Res Ctr Emergency & Resuscita, Zhongnan Hosp, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE | 2024年 / 11卷
关键词
shock; emergency department; intensive care unit; artificial intelligence; model; CARE;
D O I
10.3389/fcvm.2024.1508766
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Artificial intelligence (AI) has been widely adopted for the prediction of latent shock occurrence in critically ill patients in intensive care units (ICUs). However, the usefulness of an ICU-based model to predict latent shock risk in an emergency department (ED) setting remains unclear. This study aimed to develop an AI model to predict latent shock risk in patients admitted to EDs.Methods Multiple regression analysis was used to compare the difference between Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV-ICU and MIMIC-IV-ED datasets. An adult noninvasive model was constructed based on the MIMIC-IV-ICU v3.0 database and was externally validated in populations admitted to an ED. Its efficiency was compared with efficiency of testing with noninvasive systolic blood pressure (nSBP) and shock index.Results A total of 50,636 patients from the MIMIC-IV-ICU database was used to develop the model, and a total of 2,142 patients from the Philips IntelliSpace Critical Care and Anesthesia (ICCA)-ED and 425,087 patients from the MIMIC-IV-ED were used for external validation. The modeling and validation data revealed similar non-invasive feature distributions. Multiple regression analysis of the MIMIC-IV-ICU and MIMIC-IV-ED datasets showed mostly similar characteristics. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of the noninvasive model 10 min before the intervention was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.84-0.96), and the diagnosis accordance rate (DAR) was above 80%. More than 80% of latent shock patients were identified more than 70 min earlier using the noninvasive model; thus, it performed better than evaluating shock index and nSBP.Conclusion The adult noninvasive model can effectively predict latent shock occurrence in EDs, which is better than using shock index and nSBP.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine
    Cecconi, Maurizio
    De Backer, Daniel
    Antonelli, Massimo
    Beale, Richard
    Bakker, Jan
    Hofer, Christoph
    Jaeschke, Roman
    Mebazaa, Alexandre
    Pinsky, Michael R.
    Teboul, Jean Louis
    Vincent, Jean Louis
    Rhodes, Andrew
    [J]. INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2014, 40 (12) : 1795 - 1815
  • [2] EARLY PREDICTION OF UNEXPECTED LATENT SHOCK IN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT USING VITAL SIGNS
    Chang, Hansol
    Jung, Weon
    Ha, Juhyung
    Yu, Jae Yong
    Heo, Sejin
    Lee, Gun Tak
    Park, Jong Eun
    Lee, Se Uk
    Hwang, Sung Yeon
    Yoon, Hee
    Cha, Won Chul
    Shin, Tae Gun
    Kim, Taerim
    [J]. SHOCK, 2023, 60 (03): : 373 - 378
  • [3] Early Prediction of Cardiogenic Shock Using Machine Learning
    Chang, Yale
    Antonescu, Corneliu
    Ravindranath, Shreyas
    Dong, Junzi
    Lu, Mingyu
    Vicario, Francesco
    Wondrely, Lisa
    Thompson, Pam
    Swearingen, Dennis
    Acharya, Deepak
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2022, 9
  • [4] Prognostic performance of peripheral perfusion index and shock index combined with ESI to predict hospital outcome
    Das, Murat
    Bardakci, Okan
    Siddikoglu, Duygu
    Akdur, Gokhan
    Yilmaz, Musa Caner
    Akdur, Okhan
    Beyazit, Yavuz
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2020, 38 (10) : 2055 - 2059
  • [5] Duke G, 2004, Crit Care Resusc, V6, P261
  • [6] External validation of a machine learning model to predict hemodynamic instability in intensive care unit
    Dung-Hung, Chiang
    Cong, Tian
    Zeyu, Jiang
    Yu-Shan, Ou-Yang
    Yung-Yan, Lin
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE, 2022, 26 (01)
  • [7] Critical care physician cognitive task analysis: an exploratory study
    Fackler, James C.
    Watts, Charles
    Grome, Anna
    Miller, Thomas
    Crandall, Beth
    Pronovost, Peter
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE, 2009, 13 (02):
  • [8] MONITOR ALARM FATIGUE: STANDARDIZING USE OF PHYSIOLOGICAL MONITORS AND DECREASING NUISANCE ALARMS
    Graham, Kelly Creighton
    Cvach, Maria
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2010, 19 (01) : 28 - 34
  • [9] Comparison of the accuracy of three early warning scores with SOFA score for predicting mortality in adult sepsis and septic shock patients admitted to intensive care unit
    Khwannimit, Bodin
    Bhurayanontachai, Rungsun
    Vattanavanit, Veerapong
    [J]. HEART & LUNG, 2019, 48 (03): : 240 - 244
  • [10] Developing machine learning models to personalize care levels among emergency room patients for hospital admission
    Nguyen, Minh
    Corbin, Conor K.
    Eulalio, Tiffany
    Ostberg, Nicolai P.
    Machiraju, Gautam
    Marafino, Ben J.
    Baiocchi, Michael
    Rose, Christian
    Chen, Jonathan H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2021, 28 (11) : 2423 - 2432