Food processing according to the NOVA classification is not associated with glycemic index and glycemic load: results from an analysis of 1995 food items

被引:3
作者
Basile, Anthony J. [1 ,2 ]
Ruiz-Tejada, Anaissa [1 ]
Mohr, Alex E. [3 ]
Morales, Angel C. [1 ]
Hjelm, Ellinor [1 ]
Brand-Miller, Jennie C. [4 ]
Atkinson, Fiona S. [4 ]
Sweazea, Karen L. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Sch Life Sci, Tempe, AZ 85281 USA
[2] State Univ Oneonta New York, Oneonta, NY 13820 USA
[3] Arizona State Univ, Coll Hlth Solut, Tempe, AZ 85004 USA
[4] Univ Sydney, Charles Perkins Ctr, Sch Life & Environm Sci, Sydney, Australia
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
ultraprocessed food; glycemic index; glycemic load; food processing; minimally processed food; CONSUMPTION; SATIETY; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.08.024
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
Background: Ultraprocessed foods (UPFs) comprise most calories in the United States diet. Glycemic index (GI) and glycemic load (GL) are measures of the quality and quantity of carbohydrates in food based on their effect on postprandial blood glucose. Diets high in UPFs and GI/GL are associated with chronic metabolic diseases but the relationship between them is unclear. Objectives: Our objective was to examine the GI and GL of foods assigned to NOVA food processing groups. We hypothesized that GI and GL would be lowest in minimally processed foods (MPFs) compared to processed food (PRF) and UPF (with no difference between PRF and UPF). Methods: GI and GL values produced by healthy individuals for 1995 food items were collated from published sources. Food items were manually coded by processing levels according to NOVA classification. In addition, as the effects of processing on glycemic potential may vary between types of foods, food items were coded into 8 groups (beans, nuts, and seeds; beverages; dairy; fats and sweets; fruit; grains; fi sh, meat, and poultry; and vegetables). Multilevel linear modeling was used to determine significance with an alpha value of 0.05. Results: The effect of food processing on GI and GL was contrary to our hypothesis as means did not differ significantly across processing levels: GI-MPF: 54.1 f 19.5, PRF: 53.2 f 18.9, UPF: 49.3 f 18.1 (P = 0.712); GL-MPF: 17.1 f 10.3, PRF: 15.8 f 12.4, UPF; 11.5 f 7.9 (P = 0.890). Within food groups, there was no significant association between processing level and GI (P = 0.184), but GL was inversely associated with grains and vegetables (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Across analyzed foods, GI and GL do not differ between processing levels, whereas GL was lower in ultraprocessed grains and vegetables than MPF. Any potential adverse outcomes associated with UPF are unlikely to be related to effects on glycemia. This project was preregistered at the Open Science Framework (OSF) Registries through the Center for Open Science as 10.17605/OSF.IO/PJWG9.
引用
收藏
页码:1037 / 1042
页数:6
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Does the concept of "ultra-processed foods" help inform dietary guidelines, beyond conventional classification systems? Debate consensus [J].
Astrup, Arne ;
Monteiro, Carlos A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2022, 116 (06) :1489-1491
[2]   International tables of glycemic index and glycemic load values 2021: a systematic review [J].
Atkinson, Fiona S. ;
Brand-Miller, Jennie C. ;
Foster-Powell, Kaye ;
Buyken, Anette E. ;
Goletzke, Janina .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2021, 114 (05) :1625-1632
[3]   Joint association of food nutritional profile by Nutri-Score front- of-pack label and ultra-processed food intake with mortality: Moli-sani prospective cohort study [J].
Bonaccio, Marialaura ;
Di Castelnuovo, Augusto ;
Ruggiero, Emilia ;
Costanzo, Simona ;
Grosso, Giuseppe ;
De Curtis, Amalia ;
Cerletti, Chiara ;
Donati, Maria Benedetta ;
de Gaetano, Giovanni ;
Iacoviello, Licia .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2022, 378
[4]   FOOD-PROCESSING AND THE GLYCEMIC INDEX [J].
BRAND, JC ;
NICHOLSON, PL ;
THORBURN, AW ;
TRUSWELL, AS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 1985, 42 (06) :1192-1196
[5]   Associations of ultra-processed food consumption with cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality: UK Biobank [J].
Chen, Xuanli ;
Chu, Jiadong ;
Hu, Wei ;
Sun, Na ;
He, Qida ;
Liu, Siyuan ;
Feng, Zhaolong ;
Li, Tongxing ;
Han, Qiang ;
Shen, Yueping .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 32 (05) :779-785
[6]   Ultra-Processed Food Consumption and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes: Three Large Prospective US Cohort Studies [J].
Chen, Zhangling ;
Khandpur, Neha ;
Desjardins, Clemence ;
Wang, Lu ;
Monteiro, Carlos A. ;
Rossato, Sinara L. ;
Fung, Teresa T. ;
Manson, JoAnn E. ;
Willett, Walter C. ;
Rimm, Eric B. ;
Hu, Frank B. ;
Sun, Qi ;
Drouin-Chartier, Jean-Philippe .
DIABETES CARE, 2023, 46 (07) :1335-1344
[7]   Consumption of ultra-processed foods and body fat during childhood and adolescence: a systematic review [J].
Costa, Caroline Santos ;
Del-Ponte, Bianca ;
Formoso Assuncao, Maria Cecilia ;
Santos, Ina Silva .
PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION, 2018, 21 (01) :148-159
[8]  
Louzada MLD, 2015, REV SAUDE PUBL, V49, DOI [10.1590/S0034-8910.2015049006132, 10.1590/S0034-8910.2015049005650]
[9]   Dietary Glycemic Index, Glycemic Load, and Risk of Coronary Heart Disease, Stroke, and Stroke Mortality: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis [J].
Fan, Jingyao ;
Song, Yiqing ;
Wang, Yuyao ;
Hui, Rutai ;
Zhang, Weili .
PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (12)
[10]  
Fardet A, 2017, FOOD FUNCT, V8, P651, DOI [10.1039/c6fo01495j, 10.1039/C6FO01495J]