Archaeology as Cultural Heritage in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq

被引:0
作者
Glatz, Claudia [1 ]
Sorotou, Aphrodite [2 ]
Raheem, Kamal Rasheed [3 ]
Abdullah, Hashim Hama [4 ]
Mohammed-Amin, Rozhen K. [5 ]
Marf, DLshad A. [6 ]
Abdullatif, Nawzad [7 ]
Amin, Amanj [3 ]
Calderbank, Daniel [8 ]
Laugier, Elise Jakoby [9 ]
Hamdan, Sarwat [10 ]
Ali, Mohammed [11 ]
Ahmad, Ameera [12 ]
Sameen, Salah Mohammed [7 ]
Haydar, Shwkr Muhammed [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Glasgow, Archaeol, Sch Humanities, Molema Bldg, Glasgow G12 8QQ, Scotland
[2] INHERIT, Olympou 67, Vrilissia 15235, Greece
[3] Directorate Sulaymaniyah, Antiqu, Sulaymaniyah, Kurdistan Regio, Iraq
[4] Slemani Museum, Sulaymaniyah, Kurdistan Regio, Iraq
[5] Kurdistan Inst Strateg Studies & Sci Res, Sulaymaniyah, Kurdistan Regio, Iraq
[6] Univ Sulaimani, Dept Archaeol, Coll Humanities, Sulaymaniyah, Kurdistan Regio, Iraq
[7] Garmian Dept Antiqu, Kalar, Kurdistan Regio, Iraq
[8] Univ Glasgow, Archaeol, Molema Bldg,Lilybank Gardens, Glasgow G12 8RZ, Scotland
[9] Utah State Univ, Geospatial Sci, 5200 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT 84322 USA
[10] Garmian Civilizat Museum, Kalar, Kurdistan Regio, Iraq
[11] Garmian Heritage Museum, Kalar, Kurdistan Regio, Iraq
[12] Directorate Sulaymaniyah, Antiqu, Sulaymaniyah, Kurdistan Regio, Iraq
关键词
MIDDLE-EAST; RENAISSANCE; ANTIQUITIES; DESTRUCTION; VIOLENCE; MUSEUMS; POWER;
D O I
10.1086/731723
中图分类号
Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
030303 ;
摘要
Cultural heritage in the Middle East has over the past decades been treated and discussed in terms of an unfolding catastrophe. International archaeologists have responded with a set of emergency measures that include the remote monitoring of site conditions, the exposing of the trade in illicit antiquities, and the provision of technical assistance and training for the conservation, reconstruction, and monitoring of monuments and sites. These international initiatives, by and large, have steered clear of a discourse with local practitioners and communities about archaeology as a way of creating knowledge about the past, its historical and intellectual roots, and its complex intersections with old and new political ideologies and identities. In this article, we argue that an open discourse about archaeology as more than a set of technical skills to be mastered provides a fruitful and largely unexplored avenue toward building a more place-based and community-centered approach to cultural heritage and its stewardship in the region. We illustrate this with the work and results of our collaborative cultural heritage project in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq.
引用
收藏
页数:36
相关论文
共 166 条
[1]  
Abu-Khafajah S., 2019, Contemporary Levant, V4, P92
[2]  
Ahmed K. M., 2018, Europa Ethnica, V1, P55
[3]  
Aitchison K., 2024, Internet Archaeology, V65, DOI [10.11141/ia.65.3, DOI 10.11141/IA.65.3]
[4]  
Al-Hussainy Abbas., 2008, Public Archaeology, V7, P91, DOI DOI 10.1179/175355308X329973
[5]  
An-Na'im AbdullahiA., 1995, Human Rights in Cross-Cultural Perspective: A Quest for Consensus
[6]  
Anagnostopoulos A., 2022, Making heritage together: archaeological ethnography and community engagement with a rural community
[7]  
Andre L., 2017, LEARNING ENVIRON RES, V20, P47, DOI [10.1007/s10984-016-9222-9, DOI 10.1007/S10984-016-9222-9]
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1994, Museums and their visitors
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2021, Twejer Journal, V4, P547
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2018, A future in ruins: UNESCO, World Heritage, and the dream of peace