Ethical Issues in Memory Modification Technology: A Scoping Review

被引:0
作者
Yang, Junjie [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Dept Philosophy, 5 Yiheyuan Rd, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
关键词
Memory; Modification; Technology; Neuroethics; Scoping review; POSTTRAUMATIC-STRESS-DISORDER; ALTERING DRUGS; PROPRANOLOL; ENHANCEMENT; PREVENTION; LEGAL; MANIPULATION; NEUROSCIENCE; NEUROETHICS; JUSTICE;
D O I
10.1007/s11673-024-10371-x
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Memory modification technology (MMT) refers to the use of neurotechnologies to intervene in memories. Many scholars have reflected on the ethical issues in MMT, but a comprehensive review of this topic has not been seen. This article presents the first scoping review study of ethical issues in MMT using a bibliometric and systematic approach. After thorough examination, 133 records of key literature are included in this scoping review. Six core ethical themes are extracted: (1) self, identity, and authenticity; (2) autonomy and informed consent; (3) welfare and happiness; (4) safety and risks; (5) responsibility and obligation; (6) social and legal justice. More detailed analyses are conducted on the moral stances and reasons held by different scholars concerning these ethical themes. As can be seen, current debates exhibit certain shortcomings, including ambiguous ethical concepts and a restricted scope of analysis. Therefore, we call for deeper reflections on the philosophical foundations, more precise definitions of ethical terms, and more comprehensive examinations of neurotechnological applications, in order to better address the ethical challenges in the future.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 156 条
  • [1] The Memory-Modifying Potential of Optogenetics and the Need for Neuroethics
    Adamczyk, Agnieszka K.
    Zawadzki, Przemyslaw
    [J]. NANOETHICS, 2020, 14 (03) : 207 - 225
  • [2] Adamczyk AK., 2021, AJOB Neuroscience, V15, pW4
  • [3] Ahuja A., 2016, Financial Times
  • [4] Aksoy Sahin, 2002, Med Law, V21, P211
  • [5] Fernández MA, 2020, CAN J BIOETHICS, V3, P1
  • [6] Alonso Fernndez M., 2019, Palabra, V22, P119, DOI [10.15366/bp2019.22.005, DOI 10.15366/BP2019.22.005]
  • [7] Placebo Effects and the Ethics of Therapeutic Communication: A Pragmatic Perspective
    Annoni, Marco
    Miller, Franklin G.
    [J]. KENNEDY INSTITUTE OF ETHICS JOURNAL, 2016, 26 (01) : 79 - 103
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2003, THER BIOT PURS HAPP
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2018, Journal of Cognition and Neuroethics, V5, P31
  • [10] [Anonymous], New Bioethics, V24, P199