Scholarly Discourse on GenAI's Impact on Academic Publishing

被引:3
|
作者
Dwivedi, Yogesh K. [1 ,2 ]
Malik, Tegwen [3 ]
Hughes, Laurie [4 ]
Albashrawi, Mousa Ahmed [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] King Fahd Univ Petr & Minerals, KFUPM Business Sch, ISOM Dept, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia
[2] King Fahd Univ Petr & Minerals KFUPM, IRC Finance & Digital Econ, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia
[3] Swansea Univ, Sch Management, Digital Futures Sustainable Business & Soc Res Grp, Bay Campus, Swansea, Wales
[4] Edith Cowan Univ, Sch Business & Law, Joondalup, WA, Australia
关键词
Artificial intelligence; ChatGPT; generative artificial intelligence; gen AI; publishing; LARGE LANGUAGE MODELS; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE; CHATGPT; AI;
D O I
10.1080/08874417.2024.2435386
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
This multidisciplinary and multi-perspective review, based on more than 50 editorials and studies published in the last two years, explores the transformative impact of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) on academic publishing. While GenAI has streamlined tasks such as summarizing literature and drafting manuscripts, it has also introduced significant ethical and practical challenges. Key concerns include authorship, where GenAI falls short of meeting intellectual or accountability criteria, as well as the increasing threat of plagiarism, originality issues, and the spread of misinformation. The review also highlights biases embedded in GenAI generated content and the implications for academic fairness and inclusivity. Additionally, it addresses transparency and accountability challenges in AI use within academic environments. Through a synthesis of these diverse perspectives and presentation of a model that posits an ecosystem that governs AI policy and publications, this review advocates for comprehensive guidelines and emphasizes the critical need for human oversight to ensure responsible AI use, balancing its potential efficiencies with the integrity and rigor of academic publishing.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Discourse analysis and document analysis: SGML, scholarly publishing and structuralist theory
    Campbell, DG
    INFORMATION SCIENCE AT THE DAWN OF THE NEXT MILLENNIUM, 1998, : 193 - 208
  • [22] Two scholarly publishing cultures? Open access drives a divergence in European academic publishing practices
    Kopitar, Leon
    Plohl, Nejc
    Verboten, Mojca Tancer
    Štiglic, Gregor
    Watson, Roger
    Korošak, Dean
    arXiv,
  • [23] SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING
    LOVE, E
    BULLETIN OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION, 1991, 79 (04): : 408 - 409
  • [24] SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING
    DENIS, LG
    CANADIAN LIBRARY JOURNAL, 1971, 28 (01): : 61 - &
  • [25] SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING
    MACHIN, D
    JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, 1980, 36 (03) : 268 - 268
  • [26] SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING
    THOMPSON, BJ
    OPTICAL ENGINEERING, 1994, 33 (05) : 1389 - 1390
  • [27] Scholarly Publishing
    Mabe, Michael A.
    EUROPEAN REVIEW, 2009, 17 (01) : 3 - 22
  • [28] Scholarly publishing
    Mahon, Barry
    Online and CDROM Review, 1993, 17 (03):
  • [29] Scholarly publishing
    Rovner, Sophie
    CHEMICAL & ENGINEERING NEWS, 2008, 86 (07) : 8 - 8
  • [30] Open access publishing models: opportunity or threat to scholarly and academic publishers?
    Lamb, C
    LEARNED PUBLISHING, 2004, 17 (02) : 143 - 150