Scholarly Discourse on GenAI's Impact on Academic Publishing

被引:3
|
作者
Dwivedi, Yogesh K. [1 ,2 ]
Malik, Tegwen [3 ]
Hughes, Laurie [4 ]
Albashrawi, Mousa Ahmed [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] King Fahd Univ Petr & Minerals, KFUPM Business Sch, ISOM Dept, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia
[2] King Fahd Univ Petr & Minerals KFUPM, IRC Finance & Digital Econ, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia
[3] Swansea Univ, Sch Management, Digital Futures Sustainable Business & Soc Res Grp, Bay Campus, Swansea, Wales
[4] Edith Cowan Univ, Sch Business & Law, Joondalup, WA, Australia
关键词
Artificial intelligence; ChatGPT; generative artificial intelligence; gen AI; publishing; LARGE LANGUAGE MODELS; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE; CHATGPT; AI;
D O I
10.1080/08874417.2024.2435386
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
This multidisciplinary and multi-perspective review, based on more than 50 editorials and studies published in the last two years, explores the transformative impact of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) on academic publishing. While GenAI has streamlined tasks such as summarizing literature and drafting manuscripts, it has also introduced significant ethical and practical challenges. Key concerns include authorship, where GenAI falls short of meeting intellectual or accountability criteria, as well as the increasing threat of plagiarism, originality issues, and the spread of misinformation. The review also highlights biases embedded in GenAI generated content and the implications for academic fairness and inclusivity. Additionally, it addresses transparency and accountability challenges in AI use within academic environments. Through a synthesis of these diverse perspectives and presentation of a model that posits an ecosystem that governs AI policy and publications, this review advocates for comprehensive guidelines and emphasizes the critical need for human oversight to ensure responsible AI use, balancing its potential efficiencies with the integrity and rigor of academic publishing.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Avoiding scholarly offences in academic publishing
    Kelly, Diana
    ECONOMIC AND LABOUR RELATIONS REVIEW, 2024, 35 (01): : 1 - 6
  • [2] THE IMPACT OF TECHNOLOGY ON SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING
    HOROWITZ, IL
    CURTIS, ME
    SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING, 1982, 13 (03): : 211 - 228
  • [3] THE IMPACT OF PHOTOCOPYING ON SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING
    CLARKE, RF
    LIBRARY JOURNAL, 1963, 88 (13) : 2625 - 2629
  • [4] A model of scholarly publishing with hybrid academic journals
    Besancenot, Damien
    Vranceanu, Radu
    THEORY AND DECISION, 2017, 82 (01) : 131 - 150
  • [5] THE ACADEMIC ISOLATION OF SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING - A BOOKSELLERS VIEW
    DEWAR, K
    CANADIAN HISTORICAL REVIEW, 1981, 62 (04): : 563 - 567
  • [6] SPARC: Scholarly Publishing & Academic Resources Coalition
    Heckman, J
    IAMSLIC 2000: TIDES OF TECHNOLOGY, 2001, : 143 - 143
  • [7] A model of scholarly publishing with hybrid academic journals
    Damien Besancenot
    Radu Vranceanu
    Theory and Decision, 2017, 82 : 131 - 150
  • [8] Changes in the information dissemination process within the scholarly world: The impact of electronic publishing on scholarly communities of academic social scientists
    Costa, S
    ELECTRONIC PUBLISHING 2000, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS: ELECTRONIC PUBLISHING IN THE THIRD MILLENNIUM, 2000, : 16 - 29
  • [9] Factors predictive of an academic otolaryngologist's scholarly impact
    Shires, Courtney B.
    Klug, Theodore D.
    Meacham, Ryan K.
    Sebelik, Merry E.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2021, 7 (04): : 275 - 279
  • [10] IMPACT OF COPYRIGHT ON FUTURE OF SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING
    COLEMAN, E
    ASLIB PROCEEDINGS, 1977, 29 (07): : 259 - 265