The influence of causal loop diagrams on systems thinking and information utilization in complex problem-solving

被引:1
作者
Veldhuis, G. A. [1 ,2 ]
Smits-Clijsen, E. M. [1 ]
van Waas, R. P. M. [1 ]
Hof, T. [1 ]
Maccatrozzo, V. [1 ]
Rouwette, E. A. J. A. [2 ]
Kerstholt, J. H.
机构
[1] TNO Netherlands Org Appl Sci Res, POB 96864, NL-2509 JG The Hague, Netherlands
[2] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Inst Management Res, POB 9108, NL-6500 NK Nijmegen, Netherlands
来源
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR REPORTS | 2025年 / 17卷
关键词
Causal loop diagram; Systems thinking; System dynamics; Complex systems; Policy analysis; Youth crime; MENTAL MODEL DEVELOPMENT; DECISION-SUPPORT; TEXT; FEEDBACK; SKILLS; WORTH; REPRESENTATIONS; MISPERCEPTIONS; CONNECTIONS; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.chbr.2025.100613
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Effective communication tools are essential for computer-aided approaches to policy analysis and design. The System Dynamics approach relies on model diagrams, such as Causal Loop Diagrams (CLDs), to communicate findings to clients. Despite their importance, there has been limited examination of the effectiveness of such diagrams in supporting professionals' reasoning about complex problems. In this study, we employed a mixedmethod design with two sequential stimuli (CLD/Text or Text/CLD) to examine the impact of CLDs on professionals' (N = 14) ability to engage in systems thinking and information utilization. Through a case study on youth crime, utilizing a think-aloud method, we prompted police and municipal professionals to articulate their understanding of the problem's causes and the potential impact of an intervention. Additionally, we explored the influence of self-efficacy, response efficacy, and the need for cognition. Findings suggest that presenting a CLD following textual information enhances systems thinking and information utilization. We discuss implications and potential directions for future research.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]   Taking stock of behavioural OR: A review of behavioural studies with an intervention focus [J].
Alberto Franco, L. ;
Hamalainen, Raimo P. ;
Rouwette, Etienne A. J. A. ;
Leppanen, Ilkka .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2021, 293 (02) :401-418
[2]  
Arnold R. D., 2017, Insight, V20, P9, DOI [10.1002/inst.12159, DOI 10.1002/INST.12159]
[3]   A Definition of Systems Thinking: A Systems Approach [J].
Arnold, Ross D. ;
Wade, Jon P. .
2015 CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS ENGINEERING RESEARCH, 2015, 44 :669-678
[4]   Development of system thinking skills in the context of earth system education [J].
Assaraf, OBZ ;
Orion, N .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING, 2005, 42 (05) :518-560
[5]  
Bandura A., 1997, Self-efficacy: The exercise of control, DOI [10.1891/08898391.13.2.158, DOI 10.1891/08898391.13.2.158]
[6]   Four Case Studies, Six Years Later: Developing System Thinking Skills in Junior High School and Sustaining Them over Time [J].
Ben-Zvi-Assaraf, Orit ;
Orion, Nir .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING, 2010, 47 (10) :1253-1280
[7]   Holistic versus analytic thinking orientation and its relationship to the bullwhip effect [J].
Branch, Manuel ;
Groessler, Andreas .
SYSTEM DYNAMICS REVIEW, 2022, 38 (02) :121-134
[8]   Systems Thinking: Common Ground or Untapped Territory? [J].
Buckle Henning, Pamela ;
Chen, Wan-Ching .
SYSTEMS RESEARCH AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE, 2012, 29 (05) :470-483
[9]   Learning from text with diagrams: Promoting mental model development and inference generation [J].
Butcher, KR .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 98 (01) :182-197
[10]  
Cabrera L., 2021, Routledge handbook of systems thinking, DOI [10.13140/RG.2.2.28639.38566, DOI 10.13140/RG.2.2.28639.38566]