Introduction and Systematic Review of the Good Nursing Care Scale

被引:0
|
作者
Mattila, Tuula [1 ,2 ]
Stolt, Minna [1 ,3 ]
Katajisto, Jouko [4 ]
Leino-Kilpi, Helena [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Turku, Fac Med, Dept Nursing Sci, Turku, Finland
[2] Turku Univ Hosp, Turku, Finland
[3] Satakunta Wellbeing Serv Cty, Pori, Finland
[4] Univ Turku, Dept Math & Stat, Turku, Finland
关键词
health care quality; instrument development; nursing care; patient-centred care; quality of care; QUALITY-OF-CARE; PATIENTS PERCEPTIONS; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERIOPERATIVE CARE; CANCER-PATIENTS; PERSPECTIVE; NURSES; PARTICIPATION; EXPERIENCES; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1111/jocn.17486
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Aim(s)To provide an introduction to the Good Nursing Care Scale (GNCS) and systematically review the application of the scale in health research.DesignSystematic review.MethodsEmpirical studies published in English or Finnish in peer-reviewed journals or as a summary of a PhD thesis where the scale was used for data collection amongst patients were included. Analysis was made by using descriptive statistics, narrative analysis, and evaluation of psychometric properties.Data SourcesPubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane, and Scopus in October 2023.ResultsA total of 26 full-text studies and summaries of PhD theses were included in the review. The GNCS has been developed systematically, and the theoretical structure has remained stable. The studies indicate a high level of patient-centered quality of nursing care. Validity and reliability evaluation and reporting were systematic in the studies and mainly indicate sufficient level. Variations between countries are not large, supporting the international use of the GNCS.ConclusionsPatient-centered quality of nursing care is predominantly at high levels. However, systematic evaluation is needed to provide longitudinal data. For that purpose, the GNCS is one potential instrument.Implications for the Profession and Patient CareSupport for the use of existing, tested instruments is encouraged to provide critical ideas for the future needs of nurse practitioners, managers, teachers and researchers.ImpactThis paper impacts researchers interested in systematic evaluation of the patient-centered quality of nursing care and for practitioners taking care of patients. For researchers, it introduces a relevant instrument, the GNCS, for analysing the quality or for comparing the quality with other instruments. For practitioners, it produces evidence of the usability of the GNCS.Reporting MethodPRISMA guided the systematic review, and the COSMIN guideline was used for quality appraisal of included studies.Patient or Public contributionNo Patient or Public contribution.
引用
收藏
页码:5 / 23
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Evaluation of empathy measurement tools in nursing: systematic review
    Yu, Juping
    Kirk, Maggie
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2009, 65 (09) : 1790 - 1806
  • [42] Nursing assistants and resident satisfaction in long-term care: A systematic review
    Li, Xiaoli
    Dorstyn, Diana
    Mpofu, Elias
    O'Neill, Liam
    Li, Qiwei
    Zhang, Chi
    Ingman, Stan
    GERIATRIC NURSING, 2021, 42 (06) : 1323 - 1331
  • [43] Inpatient's Perspective on Nursing Care; Affecting Factors
    Laal, Marjan
    3RD WORLD CONFERENCE ON PSYCHOLOGY, COUNSELING AND GUIDANCE, WCPCG-2012, 2013, 84 : 243 - 247
  • [44] Validity and reliability of the 'good perioperative nursing care scale' for Turkish patients and nurses
    Donmez, Yelda Candan
    Ozbayir, Turkan
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2011, 20 (1-2) : 166 - 174
  • [45] Organization of Hospital Nursing, Provision of Nursing Care, and Patient Experiences With Care in Europe
    Bruyneel, Luk
    Li, Baoyue
    Ausserhofer, Dietmar
    Lesaffre, Emmanuel
    Dumitrescu, Irina
    Smith, Herbert L.
    Sloane, Douglas M.
    Aiken, Linda H.
    Sermeus, Walter
    MEDICAL CARE RESEARCH AND REVIEW, 2015, 72 (06) : 643 - 664
  • [46] Adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the Swedish version of the Good Nursing Care Scale for Patients
    Rehnström, L
    Christensson, L
    Leino-Kilpi, H
    Unosson, M
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF CARING SCIENCES, 2003, 17 (03) : 308 - 314
  • [47] Enhancing Nursing Practices in Critical Care for Older Adults: A Systematic Review of Age-Friendly Nursing Interventions
    Shaban, Mostafa
    Ramadan, Osama Mohamed Elsayed
    Zaky, Mohammed Elsayed
    Abdallah, Haitham Mokhtar Mohamed
    Mohammed, Huda hamdy
    Abdelgawad, Mohamed Ezzelregal
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL DIRECTORS ASSOCIATION, 2025, 26 (01)
  • [48] Good end-of-life care in nursing home according to the family carers' perspective: A systematic review of qualitative findings
    Gonella, Silvia
    Basso, Ines
    De Marinis, Maria Grazia
    Campagna, Sara
    Di Giulio, Paola
    PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2019, 33 (06) : 589 - 606
  • [49] The Greenhouse Model of Nursing Home Care: A Scoping Review
    Williams, Cynthia
    Joshi, Aishwarya
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED GERONTOLOGY, 2024, 43 (07) : 803 - 813
  • [50] Unmet nursing care needs on medical and surgical wards: A scoping review of patients' perspectives
    Bagnasco, Annamaria
    Dasso, Nicoletta
    Rossi, Silvia
    Galanti, Carolina
    Varone, Gloria
    Catania, Gianluca
    Zanini, Milko
    Aleo, Giuseppe
    Watson, Roger
    Hayter, Mark
    Sasso, Loredana
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2020, 29 (3-4) : 347 - 369