Introduction and Systematic Review of the Good Nursing Care Scale

被引:0
|
作者
Mattila, Tuula [1 ,2 ]
Stolt, Minna [1 ,3 ]
Katajisto, Jouko [4 ]
Leino-Kilpi, Helena [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Turku, Fac Med, Dept Nursing Sci, Turku, Finland
[2] Turku Univ Hosp, Turku, Finland
[3] Satakunta Wellbeing Serv Cty, Pori, Finland
[4] Univ Turku, Dept Math & Stat, Turku, Finland
关键词
health care quality; instrument development; nursing care; patient-centred care; quality of care; QUALITY-OF-CARE; PATIENTS PERCEPTIONS; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERIOPERATIVE CARE; CANCER-PATIENTS; PERSPECTIVE; NURSES; PARTICIPATION; EXPERIENCES; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1111/jocn.17486
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Aim(s)To provide an introduction to the Good Nursing Care Scale (GNCS) and systematically review the application of the scale in health research.DesignSystematic review.MethodsEmpirical studies published in English or Finnish in peer-reviewed journals or as a summary of a PhD thesis where the scale was used for data collection amongst patients were included. Analysis was made by using descriptive statistics, narrative analysis, and evaluation of psychometric properties.Data SourcesPubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane, and Scopus in October 2023.ResultsA total of 26 full-text studies and summaries of PhD theses were included in the review. The GNCS has been developed systematically, and the theoretical structure has remained stable. The studies indicate a high level of patient-centered quality of nursing care. Validity and reliability evaluation and reporting were systematic in the studies and mainly indicate sufficient level. Variations between countries are not large, supporting the international use of the GNCS.ConclusionsPatient-centered quality of nursing care is predominantly at high levels. However, systematic evaluation is needed to provide longitudinal data. For that purpose, the GNCS is one potential instrument.Implications for the Profession and Patient CareSupport for the use of existing, tested instruments is encouraged to provide critical ideas for the future needs of nurse practitioners, managers, teachers and researchers.ImpactThis paper impacts researchers interested in systematic evaluation of the patient-centered quality of nursing care and for practitioners taking care of patients. For researchers, it introduces a relevant instrument, the GNCS, for analysing the quality or for comparing the quality with other instruments. For practitioners, it produces evidence of the usability of the GNCS.Reporting MethodPRISMA guided the systematic review, and the COSMIN guideline was used for quality appraisal of included studies.Patient or Public contributionNo Patient or Public contribution.
引用
收藏
页码:5 / 23
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Advanced Practice Nursing in emergency care, a proposal for the change: Systematic review
    Galiana-Camacho, Teresa
    Gomez-Salgado, Juan
    Jesus Garcia-Iglesias, Juan
    Fernandez-Garcia, Daniel
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE SALUD PUBLICA, 2018, 92
  • [32] Rationing of nursing care, a deviation from holistic nursing: A systematic review
    Mandal, Lata
    Seethalakshmi, Avudaiappan
    Rajendrababu, Anitha
    NURSING PHILOSOPHY, 2020, 21 (01)
  • [33] Interventions to prevent or reduce rationing or missed nursing care: A scoping review
    Schubert, Maria
    Ausserhofer, Dietmar
    Bragadottir, Helga
    Rochefort, Christian. M.
    Bruyneel, Luk
    Stemmer, Renate
    Andreou, Panayiota
    Leppee, Marcel
    Palese, Alvisa
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2021, 77 (02) : 550 - 564
  • [34] Missed nursing care in acute care hospital settings in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review
    Imam, Abdulazeez
    Obiesie, Sopuruchukwu
    Gathara, David
    Aluvaala, Jalemba
    Maina, Michuki
    English, Mike
    HUMAN RESOURCES FOR HEALTH, 2023, 21 (01)
  • [35] Missed nursing care in acute care hospital settings in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review
    Abdulazeez Imam
    Sopuruchukwu Obiesie
    David Gathara
    Jalemba Aluvaala
    Michuki Maina
    Mike English
    Human Resources for Health, 21
  • [36] Psychometric properties of the quality nursing care scale-turkish version: a methodological study
    Karaca, Anita
    Kaya, Leyla
    Kaya, Gizem
    Seren, Arzu Kader Harmanci
    BMC NURSING, 2022, 21 (01)
  • [37] Patient satisfaction with nursing care in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Henok Mulugeta
    Fasil Wagnew
    Getenet Dessie
    Henok Biresaw
    Tesfa Dejenie Habtewold
    BMC Nursing, 18
  • [38] The relationship between nurse staffing and quality of care in nursing homes: A systematic review
    Spilsbury, Karen
    Hewitt, Catherine
    Stirk, Lisa
    Bowman, Clive
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2011, 48 (06) : 732 - 750
  • [39] Associations between work environment and implicit rationing of nursing care: A systematic review
    Zhao, Yingnan
    Ma, Dongfei
    Wan, Zhenzhen
    Sun, Dan
    Li, Huanhuan
    Sun, Jiao
    JOURNAL OF NURSING MANAGEMENT, 2020, 28 (08) : 1841 - 1850
  • [40] Nursing care for patients with endometriosis and/or adenomyosis: A mixed methods systematic review protocol
    O'Donoghue, Erica
    Kapp, Suzanne
    Murphy, Tracy
    Kusljic, Snezana
    COLLEGIAN, 2021, 28 (04) : 464 - 468