Introduction and Systematic Review of the Good Nursing Care Scale

被引:0
|
作者
Mattila, Tuula [1 ,2 ]
Stolt, Minna [1 ,3 ]
Katajisto, Jouko [4 ]
Leino-Kilpi, Helena [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Turku, Fac Med, Dept Nursing Sci, Turku, Finland
[2] Turku Univ Hosp, Turku, Finland
[3] Satakunta Wellbeing Serv Cty, Pori, Finland
[4] Univ Turku, Dept Math & Stat, Turku, Finland
关键词
health care quality; instrument development; nursing care; patient-centred care; quality of care; QUALITY-OF-CARE; PATIENTS PERCEPTIONS; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERIOPERATIVE CARE; CANCER-PATIENTS; PERSPECTIVE; NURSES; PARTICIPATION; EXPERIENCES; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1111/jocn.17486
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Aim(s)To provide an introduction to the Good Nursing Care Scale (GNCS) and systematically review the application of the scale in health research.DesignSystematic review.MethodsEmpirical studies published in English or Finnish in peer-reviewed journals or as a summary of a PhD thesis where the scale was used for data collection amongst patients were included. Analysis was made by using descriptive statistics, narrative analysis, and evaluation of psychometric properties.Data SourcesPubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane, and Scopus in October 2023.ResultsA total of 26 full-text studies and summaries of PhD theses were included in the review. The GNCS has been developed systematically, and the theoretical structure has remained stable. The studies indicate a high level of patient-centered quality of nursing care. Validity and reliability evaluation and reporting were systematic in the studies and mainly indicate sufficient level. Variations between countries are not large, supporting the international use of the GNCS.ConclusionsPatient-centered quality of nursing care is predominantly at high levels. However, systematic evaluation is needed to provide longitudinal data. For that purpose, the GNCS is one potential instrument.Implications for the Profession and Patient CareSupport for the use of existing, tested instruments is encouraged to provide critical ideas for the future needs of nurse practitioners, managers, teachers and researchers.ImpactThis paper impacts researchers interested in systematic evaluation of the patient-centered quality of nursing care and for practitioners taking care of patients. For researchers, it introduces a relevant instrument, the GNCS, for analysing the quality or for comparing the quality with other instruments. For practitioners, it produces evidence of the usability of the GNCS.Reporting MethodPRISMA guided the systematic review, and the COSMIN guideline was used for quality appraisal of included studies.Patient or Public contributionNo Patient or Public contribution.
引用
收藏
页码:5 / 23
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Impact of nursing students on the quality of care perceived by patients: a systematic review of the literature
    Poggi, A. Delli
    Pintus, G.
    Dionisi, S.
    Di Simone, E.
    Giannetta, N.
    Di Muzio, M.
    Mardente, S.
    Tibaldi, L.
    Tartaglini, D.
    Consorti, F.
    D'Andrea, V
    EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2021, 25 (06) : 2711 - 2725
  • [2] Measuring Quality of Care A Rasch Validity Analysis of the Good Nursing Care Scale
    Stolt, Minna
    Katajisto, Jouko
    Kottorp, Anders
    Leino-Kilpi, Helena
    JOURNAL OF NURSING CARE QUALITY, 2019, 34 (04) : E1 - E6
  • [3] Smartphone distraction during nursing care: Systematic literature review
    Fiorinelli, Massimo
    Di Mario, Sofia
    Surace, Antonella
    Mattei, Micol
    Russo, Carla
    Villa, Giulia
    Dionisi, Sara
    Di Simone, Emanuele
    Giannetta, Noemi
    Di Muzio, Marco
    APPLIED NURSING RESEARCH, 2021, 58
  • [4] Measurement tools used to assess unfinished nursing care: A systematic review of psychometric properties
    Palese, Alvisa
    Navone, Elena
    Danielis, Matteo
    Vryonides, Stavros
    Sermeus, Walter
    Papastavrou, Evridiki
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2021, 77 (02) : 565 - 582
  • [5] "Comprehensive Care" Concept in Nursing: Systematic Review
    Renghea, Alina
    Angel Cuevas-Budhart, Miguel
    Yebenes-Revuelto, Hugo
    Gomez del Pulgar, Mercedes
    Teresa Iglesias-Lopez, Maria
    INVESTIGACION Y EDUCACION EN ENFERMERIA, 2022, 40 (03):
  • [6] Workload, Job Satisfaction and Quality of Nursing Care in Italy: A Systematic Review of Native Language Articles
    Serra, Nicola
    Botti, Stefano
    Guillari, Assunta
    Simeone, Silvio
    Latina, Roberto
    Iacorossi, Laura
    Torreggiani, Martina
    Guberti, Monica
    Cicolini, Giancarlo
    Lupo, Roberto
    Capuano, Angela
    Pucciarelli, Gianluca
    Gargiulo, Gianpaolo
    Tomietto, Marco
    Rea, Teresa
    HEALTHCARE, 2023, 11 (18)
  • [7] Translation, adaptation and psychometric validation of the Good Perioperative Nursing Care Scale (GPNCS) with surgical patients in perioperative care
    Hertel-Joergensen, Michala
    Abrahamsen, Charlotte
    Jensen, Carsten
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA NURSING, 2018, 29 : 41 - 48
  • [8] The quantitative measurement of nursing care quality: a systematic review of available instruments
    Koy, V.
    Yunibhand, J.
    Angsuroch, Y.
    INTERNATIONAL NURSING REVIEW, 2016, 63 (03) : 490 - 498
  • [9] A descriptive quantitative study on multi-ethnic patient satisfaction with nursing care measured by the Revised Humane Caring Scale
    Goh, Mien Li
    Ang, Emily N. K.
    Chan, Yiong-Huak
    He, Hong-Gu
    Vehvilainen-Julkunen, Katri
    APPLIED NURSING RESEARCH, 2016, 31 : 126 - 131
  • [10] Nursing Staff Time and Care Quality in Long-Term Care Facilities: A Systematic Review
    Armijo-Olivo, Susan
    Craig, Rodger
    Corabian, Paula
    Guo, Bing
    Souri, Sepideh
    Tjosvold, Lisa
    GERONTOLOGIST, 2020, 60 (03) : E200 - E217