A Quadruplex RT-qPCR for the Detection of African Swine Fever Virus, Classical Swine Fever Virus, Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus, and Porcine Pseudorabies Virus

被引:0
|
作者
Feng, Zhuo [1 ]
Shi, Kaichuang [1 ,2 ]
Yin, Yanwen [2 ]
Shi, Yuwen [1 ]
Feng, Shuping [2 ]
Long, Feng [2 ]
Wei, Zuzhang [1 ]
Si, Hongbin [1 ]
机构
[1] Guangxi Univ, Coll Anim Sci & Technol, Nanning 530005, Peoples R China
[2] Guangxi Ctr Anim Dis Control & Prevent, Nanning 530001, Peoples R China
来源
ANIMALS | 2024年 / 14卷 / 23期
关键词
African swine fever virus (ASFV); porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV); classical swine fever virus (CSFV); porcine pseudorabies virus (PRV); multiplex RT-qPCR; GENETIC DIVERSITY; CHINA; PIGS;
D O I
10.3390/ani14233551
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
African swine fever virus (ASFV), classical swine fever virus (CSFV), porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV), and porcine pseudorabies virus (PRV) induce similar clinical signs in infected pigs, including hyperthermia, anorexia, hemorrhage, respiratory distress, neurological symptoms, and/or abortions in pregnant sows. The differential diagnosis of these diseases relies on laboratory examinations. In this study, a quadruplex RT-qPCR was established using four pairs of specific primers and probes aimed at the B646L (p72) gene of ASFV, the 5 ' untranslated region (5 ' UTR) of CSFV, the ORF6 gene of PRRSV, and the gB gene of PRV for the detection and differentiation of ASFV, CSFV, PRRSV, and PRV. The assay exhibited great sensitivity with limits of detection (LODs) of 134.585, 139.831, 147.076, and 142.331 copies/reaction for ASFV, CSFV, PRRSV, and PRV, respectively. The assay exclusively identified ASFV, CSFV, PRRSV, and PRV, yielding negative results for the other control swine viruses used in this study. The intra-assay and inter-assay coefficients of variation (CVs) were not higher than 1.12%, indicating good reproducibility of the assay. The quadruplex RT-qPCR assay was used to analyze 3116 clinical tissue samples from pigs in Guangxi province, China, from April 2023 to September 2024. ASFV, CSFV, PRRSV, and PRV had positivity rates of 10.84% (338/3116), 0.80% (25/3116), 14.92% (465/3116), and 1.38% (43/3116), respectively, demonstrating a coincidence rate of >= 99.45% with the previously described RT-qPCR assays, which were also used to test these same samples. The established assay was rapid, sensitive, and accurate in detecting and differentiating ASFV, CSFV, PRRSV, and PRV.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus expressing E2 of classical swine fever virus protects pigs from a lethal challenge of highly-pathogenic PRRSV and CSFV
    Gao, Fei
    Jiang, Yifeng
    Li, Guoxin
    Zhou, Yanjun
    Yu, Lingxue
    Li, Liwei
    Tong, Wu
    Zheng, Hao
    Zhang, Yujiao
    Yu, Hai
    Shan, Tongling
    Yang, Shen
    Liu, Huan
    Zhao, Kuan
    Tong, Guangzhi
    VACCINE, 2018, 36 (23) : 3269 - 3277
  • [32] Dual infections of feeder pigs with porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus followed by porcine respiratory coronavirus or swine influenza virus: A clinical and virological study
    VanReeth, K
    Nauwynck, H
    Pensaert, M
    VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY, 1996, 48 (3-4) : 325 - 335
  • [33] Stability of classical swine fever virus and pseudorabies virus in animal feed ingredients exposed to transpacific shipping conditions
    Stoian, Ana M. M.
    Petrovan, Vlad
    Constance, Laura A.
    Olcha, Matthew
    Dee, Scott
    Diel, Diego G.
    Sheahan, Maureen A.
    Rowland, Raymond R. R.
    Patterson, Gilbert
    Niederwerder, Megan C.
    TRANSBOUNDARY AND EMERGING DISEASES, 2020, 67 (04) : 1623 - 1632
  • [34] Age-dependent resistance to Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus replication in swine
    Klinge, Kelly L.
    Vaughn, Eric M.
    Roof, Michael B.
    Bautista, Elida M.
    Murtaugh, Michael P.
    VIROLOGY JOURNAL, 2009, 6
  • [35] Using a concurrent challenge with porcine circovirus 2 and porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus to compare swine vaccination programs
    Madapong, Adthakorn
    Saeng-Chuto, Kepalee
    Tantituvanont, Angkana
    Nilubol, Dachrit
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [36] Phylogenetic comparison of classical swine fever virus in China
    Tu, CC
    Lu, ZJ
    Li, HW
    Yu, XL
    Liu, XT
    Li, YH
    Zhang, HY
    Yin, Z
    VIRUS RESEARCH, 2001, 81 (1-2) : 29 - 37
  • [37] Genetic variability and distribution of Classical swine fever virus
    Beer, Martin
    Goller, Katja V.
    Staubach, Christoph
    Blome, Sandra
    ANIMAL HEALTH RESEARCH REVIEWS, 2015, 16 (01) : 33 - 39
  • [38] The role of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus as a risk factor in the outbreak of porcine epidemic diarrhea in immunized swine herds
    Huang, Mei-Zhou
    Wang, Hui
    Wang, Sheng-Yi
    Cui, Dong-An
    Tuo, Xin
    Liu, Yong-Ming
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF VETERINARY & ANIMAL SCIENCES, 2016, 40 (04) : 496 - 504
  • [39] Advance of African swine fever virus in recent years
    Wang, Fengxue
    Zhang, He
    Hou, Lina
    Yang, Chao
    Wen, Yongjun
    RESEARCH IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2021, 136 : 535 - 539
  • [40] Emergence of swine influenza A virus, porcine respirovirus 1 and swine orthopneumovirus in porcine respiratory disease in Germany
    Graaf-Rau, Annika
    Hennig, Christin
    Lillie-Jaschniski, Kathrin
    Koechling, Monika
    Stadler, Julia
    Boehmer, Jan
    Ripp, Ulrike
    Pohlmann, Anne
    Schwarz, Bernd-Andreas
    Beer, Martin
    Harder, Timm
    EMERGING MICROBES & INFECTIONS, 2023, 12 (02)