Research on the Carbon Footprint Accounting Method of Transformer's Whole Life Cycle Under the Background of Double Carbon

被引:0
|
作者
Li, Wei [1 ]
Bian, Yifan [2 ]
Zhang, Yunyun [1 ]
Zhou, Erbiao [1 ]
Xie, Lirong [2 ]
机构
[1] State Grid Xinjiang Elect Power Co, Econ & Tech Res Inst, Urumqi 830018, Peoples R China
[2] Xinjiang Univ, Sch Elect Engn, Urumqi 830017, Peoples R China
关键词
transformer; carbon footprint; life cycle assessment; oil-immersed transformer; dry-type transformer;
D O I
10.3390/en18030499
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
In response to the existing gaps in the carbon footprint assessment framework for core electrical equipment transformers, which impedes power companies from effectively supporting low-carbon procurement of materials and products, this study proposes a novel evaluation method for transformer carbon footprints. This method comprehensively considers all stages of the transformer lifecycle, including manufacturing, transportation, installation, operation, and decommissioning. A review of mainstream carbon footprint accounting schemes, both domestic and international, is first presented, summarizing established accounting methods and calculation processes. The paper then introduces a novel, integrated carbon footprint accounting approach for transformers, covering the entire 'cradle-to-grave' lifecycle, along with an associated calculation model. This framework analyzes the carbon footprint composition across production, assembly, transportation, usage, and recycling stages for four commonly used, high-efficiency transformers at State Grid Xinjiang Electric Power Company, the carbon footprint of an oil-immersed 100 kVA/10 kV transformer is 2.353 x 106 kg CO2e, approximately half that of a conventional 100 kVA/10 kV transformer. Finally, the study provides recommendations for carbon reduction pathways for transformers, considering both functional substitution and technological carbon reduction strategies.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A life-cycle carbon footprint of Yosemite National Park
    Villalba, Gara
    Tarnay, Leland
    Campbell, Elliott
    Gabarrell, Xavier
    ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 62 : 1336 - 1343
  • [32] Is magnesia cement low carbon? Life cycle carbon footprint comparing with Portland cement
    Shen, Weiguo
    Cao, Liu
    Li, Qiu
    Wen, Zhaijun
    Wang, Jing
    Liu, Yun
    Dong, Rui
    Tan, Yu
    Chen, Rufa
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 131 : 20 - 27
  • [33] Ecodesign - Carbon Footprint - Life Cycle Assessment - Life Cycle Sustainability Analysis. A Flexible Framework for a Continuum of Tools
    Heijungs, Reinout
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND CLIMATE TECHNOLOGIES, 2010, 4 (01) : 42 - 46
  • [34] Research on the Calculation Method for Cement Manufacture Carbon Footprint
    Gan Yufeng
    Qin Xianming
    Guo Hong
    FRONTIERS OF GREEN BUILDING, MATERIALS AND CIVIL ENGINEERING III, PTS 1-3, 2013, 368-370 : 968 - +
  • [35] Carbon Footprint Analysis of Cocoa Product Indonesia Using Life Cycle Assessment Methods
    Dianawati
    Indrasti, Nastiti S.
    Ismayana, Andes
    Yuliasi, Indah
    Djatna, Taufik
    JOURNAL OF ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2023, 24 (07): : 187 - 197
  • [36] Life cycle carbon footprint assessment of coal-to-SNG/methanol polygeneration process
    Liu, Jing
    Zhuang, Yu
    Wang, Chao
    Du, Jian
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 908
  • [37] Carbon footprint and life cycle assessment of centralised and decentralised handling of wastewater during rain
    Clauson-Kaas, Jes
    Sorensen, Birgitte Lilholt
    Dalgaard, Ole G.
    Sharma, Anitha K.
    Johansen, Niels Bent
    Rindel, Kim
    Andersen, Helle K.
    JOURNAL OF WATER AND CLIMATE CHANGE, 2012, 3 (04) : 266 - 275
  • [38] Carbon footprint of different fuels used in public transportation in Taiwan: a life cycle assessment
    Chang, Ching-Chih
    Huang, Po-Chien
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 24 (04) : 5811 - 5825
  • [39] Cost benefit analysis and carbon footprint of biogas energy through life cycle assessment
    Kuo, Tsai-Chi
    Chen, Hsiang-Yue
    Chong, Billy
    Lin, Meichun
    CLEANER ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, 2024, 15
  • [40] Carbon footprint of different fuels used in public transportation in Taiwan: a life cycle assessment
    Ching-Chih Chang
    Po-Chien Huang
    Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2022, 24 : 5811 - 5825