Integrating Remote Sensing and Soil Features for Enhanced Machine Learning-Based Corn Yield Prediction in the Southern US

被引:1
|
作者
Sarkar, Sayantan [1 ]
Osorio Leyton, Javier M. [1 ]
Noa-Yarasca, Efrain [1 ]
Adhikari, Kabindra [2 ]
Hajda, Chad B. [2 ]
Smith, Douglas R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M AgriLife Blackland Res & Extens Ctr, Temple, TX 76502 USA
[2] United States Dept Agr, Agr Res Serv, Grassland Soil & Water Res Lab, Temple, TX 76502 USA
关键词
corn; maize; yield prediction; machine learning; vegetation indices; ensemble methods; LEAF PIGMENT CONTENT; VEGETATION INDEX; SPECTRAL REFLECTANCE; CHLOROPHYLL CONTENT; AREA INDEX; WHEAT; CANOPY; GRAIN; WATER; TOPOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.3390/s25020543
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Efficient and reliable corn (Zea mays L.) yield prediction is important for varietal selection by plant breeders and management decision-making by growers. Unlike prior studies that focus mainly on county-level or controlled laboratory-scale areas, this study targets a production-scale area, better representing real-world agricultural conditions and offering more practical relevance for farmers. Therefore, the objective of our study was to determine the best combination of vegetation indices and abiotic factors for predicting corn yield in a rain-fed, production-scale area, identify the most suitable corn growth stage for yield estimation using machine learning, and identify the most effective machine learning model for corn yield estimation. Our study used high-resolution (6 cm) aerial multispectral imagery. Sixty-two different predictors, including soil properties (sand, silt, and clay percentages), slope, spectral bands (red, green, blue, red-edge, NIR), vegetation indices (GNDRE, NDRE, TGI), color-space indices, and wavelengths were derived from the multispectral data collected at the seven (V4, V5, V6, V7, V9, V12, and V14/VT) growth stages of corn. Four regression and machine learning algorithms were evaluated for yield prediction: linear regression, random forest, extreme gradient boosting, and gradient boosting regressor. A total of 6865 yield values were used for model training and 1716 for validation. Results show that, using random forest method, the V14/VT stage had the best yield predictions (RMSE of 0.52 Mg/ha for a mean yield of 10.19 Mg/ha), and yield estimation at V6 stage was still feasible. We concluded that integrating abiotic factors, such as slope and soil properties, significantly improved model accuracy. Among vegetation indices, TGI, HUE, and GNDRE performed better. Results from this study can help farmers or crop consultants plan ahead for future logistics through enhanced early-season yield predictions and support farm profitability and sustainability.
引用
收藏
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Assessing the impact of agricultural field traffic on corn grain yield using remote sensing and machine learning
    Khanal, Sami
    Klopfenstein, Andrew
    Kushal, K. C.
    Ramarao, Venkatesh
    Fulton, John
    Douridas, Nathan
    Shearer, Scott A.
    SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 2021, 208
  • [32] A Novel Urban Heat Vulnerability Analysis: Integrating Machine Learning and Remote Sensing for Enhanced Insights
    Li, Fei
    Yigitcanlar, Tan
    Nepal, Madhav
    Thanh, Kien Nguyen
    Dur, Fatih
    REMOTE SENSING, 2024, 16 (16)
  • [33] Machine learning-based corrosion rate prediction of steel embedded in soil
    Dong, Zheng
    Ding, Ling
    Meng, Zhou
    Xu, Ke
    Mao, Yongqi
    Chen, Xiangxiang
    Ye, Hailong
    Poursaee, Amir
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [34] UAV remote sensing phenotyping of wheat collection for response to water stress and yield prediction using machine learning
    Sharma, Vikas
    Honkavaara, Eija
    Hayden, Matthew
    Kant, Surya
    PLANT STRESS, 2024, 12
  • [35] Machine learning-based prediction and performance study of transparent soil properties
    Wang, Bo
    Hou, Hengjun
    Zhu, Zhengwei
    Xiao, Wang
    SMART STRUCTURES AND SYSTEMS, 2021, 28 (02) : 289 - 304
  • [36] Machine learning-based prediction of soil organic matter via smartphone
    Gao, Qingying
    Chen, Yi
    Zhang, Hui
    Chen, Jingjing
    Wang, Liang
    ALL LIFE, 2024, 17 (01)
  • [37] A comprehensive review of soil organic carbon estimates: Integrating remote sensing and machine learning technologies
    Li, Tong
    Cui, Lizhen
    Kuhnert, Matthias
    Mclaren, Timothy I.
    Pandey, Rajiv
    Liu, Hongdou
    Wang, Weijin
    Xu, Zhihong
    Xia, Anquan
    Dalal, Ram C.
    Dang, Yash P.
    JOURNAL OF SOILS AND SEDIMENTS, 2024, : 3556 - 3571
  • [38] A novel finer soil strength mapping framework based on machine learning and remote sensing images
    Wang, Ruizhen
    Wan, Siyang
    Chen, Weitao
    Qin, Xuwen
    Zhang, Guo
    Wang, Lizhe
    COMPUTERS & GEOSCIENCES, 2024, 182
  • [39] Soil and satellite remote sensing variables importance using machine learning to predict cotton yield
    Carneiro, Franciele Morlin
    de Brito Filho, Armando Lopes
    Ferreira, Francielle Morelli
    Seben Junior, Getulio de Freitas
    Brandao, Ziany Neiva
    da Silva, Rouverson Pereira
    Shiratsuchi, Luciano Shozo
    SMART AGRICULTURAL TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 5
  • [40] Yield prediction in a peanut breeding program using remote sensing data and machine learning algorithms
    Pugh, N. Ace
    Young, Andrew
    Ojha, Manisha
    Emendack, Yves
    Sanchez, Jacobo
    Xin, Zhanguo
    Puppala, Naveen
    FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2024, 15