Integrating Remote Sensing and Soil Features for Enhanced Machine Learning-Based Corn Yield Prediction in the Southern US

被引:1
|
作者
Sarkar, Sayantan [1 ]
Osorio Leyton, Javier M. [1 ]
Noa-Yarasca, Efrain [1 ]
Adhikari, Kabindra [2 ]
Hajda, Chad B. [2 ]
Smith, Douglas R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M AgriLife Blackland Res & Extens Ctr, Temple, TX 76502 USA
[2] United States Dept Agr, Agr Res Serv, Grassland Soil & Water Res Lab, Temple, TX 76502 USA
关键词
corn; maize; yield prediction; machine learning; vegetation indices; ensemble methods; LEAF PIGMENT CONTENT; VEGETATION INDEX; SPECTRAL REFLECTANCE; CHLOROPHYLL CONTENT; AREA INDEX; WHEAT; CANOPY; GRAIN; WATER; TOPOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.3390/s25020543
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Efficient and reliable corn (Zea mays L.) yield prediction is important for varietal selection by plant breeders and management decision-making by growers. Unlike prior studies that focus mainly on county-level or controlled laboratory-scale areas, this study targets a production-scale area, better representing real-world agricultural conditions and offering more practical relevance for farmers. Therefore, the objective of our study was to determine the best combination of vegetation indices and abiotic factors for predicting corn yield in a rain-fed, production-scale area, identify the most suitable corn growth stage for yield estimation using machine learning, and identify the most effective machine learning model for corn yield estimation. Our study used high-resolution (6 cm) aerial multispectral imagery. Sixty-two different predictors, including soil properties (sand, silt, and clay percentages), slope, spectral bands (red, green, blue, red-edge, NIR), vegetation indices (GNDRE, NDRE, TGI), color-space indices, and wavelengths were derived from the multispectral data collected at the seven (V4, V5, V6, V7, V9, V12, and V14/VT) growth stages of corn. Four regression and machine learning algorithms were evaluated for yield prediction: linear regression, random forest, extreme gradient boosting, and gradient boosting regressor. A total of 6865 yield values were used for model training and 1716 for validation. Results show that, using random forest method, the V14/VT stage had the best yield predictions (RMSE of 0.52 Mg/ha for a mean yield of 10.19 Mg/ha), and yield estimation at V6 stage was still feasible. We concluded that integrating abiotic factors, such as slope and soil properties, significantly improved model accuracy. Among vegetation indices, TGI, HUE, and GNDRE performed better. Results from this study can help farmers or crop consultants plan ahead for future logistics through enhanced early-season yield predictions and support farm profitability and sustainability.
引用
收藏
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] UAV Remote Sensing Prediction Method of Winter Wheat Yield Based on the Fused Features of Crop and Soil
    Tian, Zezhong
    Zhang, Yao
    Liu, Kaidi
    Li, Zhenhai
    Li, Minzan
    Zhang, Haiyang
    Wu, Jiangmei
    REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 14 (19)
  • [22] Integrating solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence with traditional remote sensing and environmental variables for enhanced rice yield prediction in Nepal using machine learning
    Lamichhane, Manoj
    Chapagain, Abin Raj
    Mehan, Sushant
    Ames, Daniel P.
    Kafle, Sagar
    REMOTE SENSING APPLICATIONS-SOCIETY AND ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 36
  • [23] Alfalfa yield prediction using machine learning and UAV multispectral remote sensing
    Yan H.
    Zhuo Y.
    Li M.
    Wang Y.
    Guo H.
    Wang J.
    Li C.
    Ding F.
    Nongye Gongcheng Xuebao/Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2022, 38 (11): : 64 - 71
  • [24] Remote sensing and machine learning algorithms to predict soil salinity in southern Kazakhstan
    Amirgaliyev, Yedilkhan
    Mukhamediev, Ravil
    Merembayev, Timur
    Kuchin, Yan
    Ataniyazova, Aisulyu
    Omarova, Perizat
    DISCOVER SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 5 (01):
  • [25] Wheat yield estimation using remote sensing data based on machine learning approaches
    Cheng, Enhui
    Zhang, Bing
    Peng, Dailiang
    Zhong, Liheng
    Yu, Le
    Liu, Yao
    Xiao, Chenchao
    Li, Cunjun
    Li, Xiaoyi
    Chen, Yue
    Ye, Huichun
    Wang, Hongye
    Yu, Ruyi
    Hu, Jinkang
    Yang, Songlin
    FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2022, 13
  • [26] UAV Remote Sensing for High-Throughput Phenotyping and for Yield Prediction of Miscanthus by Machine Learning Techniques
    Impollonia, Giorgio
    Croci, Michele
    Ferrarini, Andrea
    Brook, Jason
    Martani, Enrico
    Blandinieres, Henri
    Marcone, Andrea
    Awty-Carroll, Danny
    Ashman, Chris
    Kam, Jason
    Kiesel, Andreas
    Trindade, Luisa M.
    Boschetti, Mirco
    Clifton-Brown, John
    Amaducci, Stefano
    REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 14 (12)
  • [27] Crop type classification in Southern Brazil: Integrating remote sensing, crop modeling and machine learning
    Pott, Luan Pierre
    Amado, Telmo Jorge Carneiro
    Schwalbert, Rai Augusto
    Corassa, Geomar Mateus
    Ciampitti, Ignacio Antonio
    COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 2022, 201
  • [28] Machine Learning-Based Radiomic Features for Glioblastoma Overall Survival Prediction
    Das, Ankit
    Cheng, Kee Yen
    Liu, Yong
    Goh, Rick Siow Mong
    Yang, Feng
    2024 IEEE CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, CAI 2024, 2024, : 894 - 898
  • [29] Machine learning-based crop recognition from aerial remote sensing imagery
    Yanqin Tian
    Chenghai Yang
    Wenjiang Huang
    Jia Tang
    Xingrong Li
    Qing Zhang
    Frontiers of Earth Science, 2021, 15 : 54 - 69
  • [30] Machine learning-based crop recognition from aerial remote sensing imagery
    Tian, Yanqin
    Yang, Chenghai
    Huang, Wenjiang
    Tang, Jia
    Li, Xingrong
    Zhang, Qing
    FRONTIERS OF EARTH SCIENCE, 2021, 15 (01) : 54 - 69