Effects of the lesion size on clinically significant prostate cancer detection rates in PI-RADS category 3--5 lesions

被引:0
|
作者
Ayranci, A. [1 ]
Caglar, U. [1 ]
Meric, A. [1 ]
Gelmis, M. [1 ]
Sarilar, O. [1 ]
Ozgor, F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Formac & Invest Haseki, Serv Urol, Estambul, Turkiye
来源
ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS | 2024年 / 48卷 / 07期
关键词
Prostate cancer; Lesion volume; PI-RADS; Screening; Fusion biopsy; PREDICT; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.acuro.2024.01.003
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Prostate cancer (PCa) ranks second among prevalent cancers in men, necessitating effective screening tools such as multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) with the prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) classification. This study explores the impact of lesion volume on clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) detection rates in PI-RADS 3--5 lesions, aiming to contribute insights into the underexplored relationship between lesion size and csPCa detection. Materials and methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on data from 754 patients undergoing mpMRI-guided transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) prostate biopsy between January 2016 and 2023. Patients with PI-RADS 3, 4, and 5 lesions were included. Lesion size and PI-RADS categories were assessed through mpMRI, followed by MR fusion biopsy. Results: Of the patients, 33.7%, 52.3%, and 14.1% had PI-RADS 3, 4, and 5 lesions, respectively. Lesion sizes correlated significantly with csPCa detection in PI-RADS 4 and 5 categories. For PI-RADS 3 lesions, no significant differences in csPCa rates were observed based on lesion size. However, in PI-RADS 4 and 5 groups, larger lesions showed higher csPCa rates. Conclusions: This study suggests that subgroup categorizations based on lesion volume could predict clinically significant PCa with high accuracy, potentially reducing unnecessary biopsies and associated overtreatment. Future research should further explore the relationship between lesion size and csPCa, clarifying discussions regarding the inclusion of systematic biopsies in diagnostic protocols. (c) 2024 AEU. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:526 / 531
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Diagnostic value of combining PI-RADS v2.1 with PSAD in clinically significant prostate cancer
    Wei, Xiaoting
    Xu, Jianmin
    Zhong, Shuyuan
    Zou, Jinsen
    Cheng, Zhiqiang
    Ding, Zhiguang
    Zhou, Xuhui
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2022, 47 (10) : 3574 - 3582
  • [42] Diagnostic value of combining PI-RADS v2.1 with PSAD in clinically significant prostate cancer
    Xiaoting Wei
    Jianmin Xu
    Shuyuan Zhong
    Jinsen Zou
    Zhiqiang Cheng
    Zhiguang Ding
    Xuhui Zhou
    Abdominal Radiology, 2022, 47 : 3574 - 3582
  • [43] Validation of PI-RADS Version 2 in Transition Zone Lesions for the Detection of Prostate Cancer
    Thai, Janice N.
    Narayanan, Harish A.
    George, Arvin K.
    Siddiqui, M. Minhaj
    Shah, Parita
    Mertan, Francesca V.
    Merino, Maria J.
    Pinto, Peter A.
    Choyke, Peter L.
    Wood, Bradford J.
    Turkbey, Baris
    RADIOLOGY, 2018, 288 (02) : 485 - 491
  • [44] Prospective Evaluation of PI-RADS Version 2.1 for Prostate Cancer Detection
    Walker, Stephanie M.
    Mehralivand, Sherif
    Harmon, Stephanie A.
    Sanford, Thomas
    Merino, Maria J.
    Wood, Bradford J.
    Shih, Joanna H.
    Pinto, Peter A.
    Choyke, Peter L.
    Turkbey, Baris
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2020, 215 (05) : 1098 - 1103
  • [45] Index lesion detection in multifocal prostate cancer: Simplified PI-RADS biparametric MRI vs PI-RADS v2.1 multiparametric MRI
    Scialpi, Michele
    Martorana, Eugenio
    Torre, Riccardo
    Scalera, Giovanni Battista
    Belatti, Eugenio
    Improta, Antonio
    Aisa, Maria Cristina
    Burani, Aldo
    Santini, Nicola
    D'Andrea, Alfredo
    Mancioli, Francesco Maria
    Scialpi, Pietro
    Di Blasi, Aldo
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2023, 94 : 108 - 115
  • [46] The effect of multiplicity of PI-RADS 3 lesions on cancer detection rate of confirmatory targeted biopsy in patients diagnosed with prostate cancer and managed with active surveillance
    Yaguchi, Grace
    Tang, Hoang J.
    Deebajah, Mustafa
    Keeley, Jacob
    Pantelic, Milan
    Williamson, Sean
    Gupta, Nilesh
    Peabody, James O.
    Menon, Mani
    Dabaja, Ali
    Alanee, Shaheen
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2020, 38 (06) : 599.e9 - 599.e13
  • [47] PI-RADS-Based Segmented Threshold of PSMA-PET SUVmax Is Better than Traditional Fixed Threshold for Diagnosing Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Especially for PI-RADS 3 Lesions
    Xiaoli Meng
    Wenhui Ma
    Jingliang Zhang
    Zhiyong Quan
    Mingru Zhang
    Jiajun Ye
    Jun Shu
    Jing Ren
    Weijun Qin
    Fei Kang
    Jing Wang
    Molecular Imaging and Biology, 2023, 25 : 887 - 896
  • [48] Comparison of PI-RADS version 2 and PI-RADS version 2.1 for the detection of transition zone prostate cancer
    Tamada, Tsutomu
    Kido, Ayumu
    Takeuchi, Mitsuru
    Yamamoto, Akira
    Miyaji, Yoshiyuki
    Kanomata, Naoki
    Sone, Teruki
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2019, 121
  • [49] PI-RADS-Based Segmented Threshold of PSMA-PET SUVmax Is Better than Traditional Fixed Threshold for Diagnosing Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Especially for PI-RADS 3 Lesions
    Meng, Xiaoli
    Ma, Wenhui
    Zhang, Jingliang
    Quan, Zhiyong
    Zhang, Mingru
    Ye, Jiajun
    Shu, Jun
    Ren, Jing
    Qin, Weijun
    Kang, Fei
    Wang, Jing
    MOLECULAR IMAGING AND BIOLOGY, 2023, 25 (05) : 887 - 896
  • [50] Development and Validation of Interpretable Machine Learning Models for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Diagnosis in Patients With Lesions of PI-RADS v2.1 Score ≥3
    Ruan, Mingjian
    Liu, Yi
    Yao, Kaifeng
    Wang, Kexin
    Fan, Yu
    Wu, Shiliang
    Wang, Xiaoying
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2024, 60 (05) : 2130 - 2141